
Yes and the proof he is a racist is he tried to protect property during a totally legit, planned riot. You guys deserve the crime you get. Nobody pulling this crap in the south lands and the rural west. |
Pp here. I’m not sure what you mean by this post. |
Didn't the Feds step in after a few southern acquitals during the civil rights era? They charged supremecist murderers with violating civil rights. But RFK was an Attorney General with courage. Also, on Thursday Kyle's mom went on Hannity and said if Kyle is released he will do it again. https://www.rawstory.com/kyle-rittenhouse-2655547192/ ![]() |
Yep. It is astounding how the actual facts in this case are in direct opposition to the narrative that has been painted by much of the media for the past year. |
Not surprising at all. Americans live in two worlds with two different realities shaped by their political beliefs and the media they get their news from. How we’ve gotten to the point where we’re dealing with two sets of facts. |
Wow. What kind of bubble is the PP in to claim that "there is no idolizing of KR?" There are literally dozens upon dozens of stores on the web selling "Free Kyle" shirts, flags and merchandise. PP, if you are truly that clueless you should just stop posting and embarrassing yourself like that. ![]() |
Free Kyle (not wanting him to be convicted of a crime he didn’t commit) = idolizing him? We must have different definitions of idolize. |
DP. Yes, yours is the ostrich version. |
I suggest you go look up the definition and report back. |
Please show me what states make it legal to kill to protect property. It’s been established the law in WI says you may only use reasonable force to protect yourself. You can’t escalate the force. I bet he gets off but that’s not justice. |
DP. Merely feeling that he is not guilty and should not be convicted is one thing; spending money on a t-shirt to wear so that you communicate to everyone who lays eyes on you that you stand behind Kyle’s actions is a strong political statement. Donating money for his defense = helping him. Buying a t-shirt from random vendors = political statement that you firmly support heavily armed citizens acting as vigilantes, regardless of their abilities or the legalities of their carrying weapons or being on the streets in the first place — IOW, “gun nut.” Regardless of what message the wearers wish to send, that’s the message a sizable portion of the population receives. A sizable subset of that population will see these t-shirts and think the wearer is a Trump supporter. Wearing such a shirt may not indicate “idolizing” Kyle, but it’s definitely a very public embrace of him. |
I’m not buying any shirts, but it’s obvious to me having watched most of the trial that this was classic self defense since he was running away and they attacked him and so the kid should walk. I also think the world is a better place without a child rapist and thugs, vandals, and looters in it, so it’s not like there’s any great loss there.
People aren’t buying the shirt because of Kyle though. They’re buying it to show that they are standing up for law and order and justice in this country. It’s a different thing. It’s just like the let’s go B meme isn’t about Biden, it’s about how screwed up the mainstream media is in this country and how they spin everything the way they want. Which is happening here too, of course. |
Kyle was not legally permitted to be out on the streets. He violated the curfew, just like the rioters did. He most likely violated the law by carrying the gun that he used to shoot 3 people. This is the difference between people who like “law and order,” (i.e., it’s good when people who agree me use guns to keep other people in line) and people who like “the rule of law,” (if you’re out breaking the law and adding to the chaos and violence and creating more work for the police, you’re no better than the original rioters). You may be extremely unhappy with the way Kenosha’s mayor and police force handled the rioters, but Kyle didn’t make those streets any safer or calmer. Had he stayed home, there’s an excellent chance no one would have died. |
Wasn’t he awful, preventing the fires that pedophile set from burning out of control and then shooting the pedophile attacking yet another minor (him) when said pedophile became enraged at the interruption of his plans to burn things down. |
Pretty sure that’s not an effective prosecution strategy. |