Joe is out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on Kamala! I love Joe Biden and I’m sad to see him go. I think Kamala will energize the ticket. She will give voters what they want, something new and someone young!

YES! And now TRUMP is the senile cranky grampa. Let's make something of HIS age.

And what is this rumor of J Manchin trying to switch back to a Dem to run against Harris?? He is also up there in age - 76.

He backs abortion bans, no chance.

OMG -- if you Dems can't see that you need someone like Manchin to run in order to win against Trump you are wearing blinders. So many Trump supporters would abandon him outright to support Manchin. It's called compromise. It's called unification.

+1
In addition, he absolutely supports abortion rights, even if he's personally pro-life.

https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-supports-bipartisan-effort-to-codify-roe-v-wade

He is 76 years old. Did you not learn your lesson with Biden?

PP here. I'm actually a Republican who would vote for Manchin in a heartbeat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

Yeah, no Dem is going to be able to run from Biden’s miserable record unless he or she is a total outsider centrist. Harris? She has his mess weighing on her shoulders.

Miserable record"

LOL

What was the Dow, unemployment rate or jobless claims when Trump left office?

You conveniently left out a world wide pandemic. But whatever.

That Trump completely mismanaged in every conceivable way.

Shine some UV light down your mouth or inject bleach. That will get you all fixed up.

Who told people to inject bleach? Citations please.

he did not say bleach he said disinfectant. it was the same press conference where he suggest light would kill covid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on Kamala! I love Joe Biden and I’m sad to see him go. I think Kamala will energize the ticket. She will give voters what they want, something new and someone young!

YES! And now TRUMP is the senile cranky grampa. Let's make something of HIS age.

And what is this rumor of J Manchin trying to switch back to a Dem to run against Harris?? He is also up there in age - 76.

He backs abortion bans, no chance.

OMG -- if you Dems can't see that you need someone like Manchin to run in order to win against Trump you are wearing blinders. So many Trump supporters would abandon him outright to support Manchin. It's called compromise. It's called unification.

+1
In addition, he absolutely supports abortion rights, even if he's personally pro-life.

https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-supports-bipartisan-effort-to-codify-roe-v-wade

Nope.

He supports putting out a statement trying to distance himself from the blood on his hands. He had the opportunity to vote to protect abortion rights and he chose to side with the Republicans. I hope he sleeps really well knowing how many women are in danger because of him.

He voted with the Republicans because the Democrats tried to take it TOO FAR. They wanted to go above and beyond what Roe guaranteed.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/596223-manchin-joins-with-senate-gop-to-block-bill-guaranteeing-abortion-access/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These spineless Democrats just cost themselves the presidency. Joe Biden was their best chance even after the disastrous debate. Democrats need to learn a few things from Republicans.

+1. Huge trainwreck for the Dems

And so much fun to watch.

What is it that you think Trump will accomplish as a lame duck President who will still be dealing with trials, lawsuits, and jail time? Just about everyone in his last administration quit and said horrible things about him. What super wonderful things did he accomplish in his first term? He’s going to preoccupied with handing out pardons to all of his followers from J6 and other loyalists, maneuvering to get all of his federal charges dismissed, handing out awards to Rudy and The My Pillow Guy, cozying up to despots and Putin, building monuments to himself and figuring out ways to go after Democrats. The last thing on his mind is actually doing anything that benefits the country and not him in particular.

You’re aware that Kamala’s staff did exactly the same thing, right?
DP

Cabinet members are different than regular staff. But, you know, not only did Cabinet members not want to come back, but so many people also left during Trump's stint in the WH.

Same thing.

It is not at all, but you are clueless.

So persuasive! Sorry, turnover of staff is turnover of staff and both candidates have this issue.

+1
PP seems not to want to acknowledge the toxic workplace environment Kamala’s staffers had to endure.

Critics scattered over two decades point to an inconsistent and at times degrading principal who burns through seasoned staff members who have succeeded in other demanding, high-profile positions. People used to putting aside missteps, sacrificing sleep and enduring the occasional tirade from an irate boss say doing so under Harris can be particularly difficult, as she has struggled to make progress on her vice-presidential portfolio or measure up to the potential that has many pegging her as the future of the Democratic Party.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/04/kamala-harris-staff-departures/

You guys are desperate and pooping your pants. It’s a joy to behold.

There's another Democrat with the poop fixation. So bizarre. And how is pointing out Kamala's toxic work environment "desperate"? Kind of seems like you'd prefer that to be kept under wraps.

I don't really seem why we care. Politicians are often mean to staff. Big deal.

So you apply that philosophy to Republicans too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These spineless Democrats just cost themselves the presidency. Joe Biden was their best chance even after the disastrous debate. Democrats need to learn a few things from Republicans.

+1. Huge trainwreck for the Dems

And so much fun to watch.

What is it that you think Trump will accomplish as a lame duck President who will still be dealing with trials, lawsuits, and jail time? Just about everyone in his last administration quit and said horrible things about him. What super wonderful things did he accomplish in his first term? He’s going to preoccupied with handing out pardons to all of his followers from J6 and other loyalists, maneuvering to get all of his federal charges dismissed, handing out awards to Rudy and The My Pillow Guy, cozying up to despots and Putin, building monuments to himself and figuring out ways to go after Democrats. The last thing on his mind is actually doing anything that benefits the country and not him in particular.

You’re aware that Kamala’s staff did exactly the same thing, right?
DP

Cabinet members are different than regular staff. But, you know, not only did Cabinet members not want to come back, but so many people also left during Trump's stint in the WH.

Same thing.

It is not at all, but you are clueless.

So persuasive! Sorry, turnover of staff is turnover of staff and both candidates have this issue.

+1
PP seems not to want to acknowledge the toxic workplace environment Kamala’s staffers had to endure.

Critics scattered over two decades point to an inconsistent and at times degrading principal who burns through seasoned staff members who have succeeded in other demanding, high-profile positions. People used to putting aside missteps, sacrificing sleep and enduring the occasional tirade from an irate boss say doing so under Harris can be particularly difficult, as she has struggled to make progress on her vice-presidential portfolio or measure up to the potential that has many pegging her as the future of the Democratic Party.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/04/kamala-harris-staff-departures/

You guys are desperate and pooping your pants. It’s a joy to behold.

There's another Democrat with the poop fixation. So bizarre. And how is pointing out Kamala's toxic work environment "desperate"? Kind of seems like you'd prefer that to be kept under wraps.

I don't really seem why we care. Politicians are often mean to staff. Big deal.

So you apply that philosophy to Republicans too?

Yeah. I'm not sure I've ever paid attention to how a single Republican treats their staff. I work in banking. If someone came to my office complaining that there were egos everywhere, I'd just open the door for them to exit. These types of industries attract narcissists and massive egos. If you want niceties, go into nonprofits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

Yeah, no Dem is going to be able to run from Biden’s miserable record unless he or she is a total outsider centrist. Harris? She has his mess weighing on her shoulders.

Miserable record"

LOL

What was the Dow, unemployment rate or jobless claims when Trump left office?

You conveniently left out a world wide pandemic. But whatever.

That Trump completely mismanaged in every conceivable way.

Shine some UV light down your mouth or inject bleach. That will get you all fixed up.

Who told people to inject bleach? Citations please.

he did not say bleach he said disinfectant. it was the same press conference where he suggest light would kill covid.

He was right . Ever read the back of a Lysol bottle? It says it kills corona virus . It’s not Trump’s fault some idiots decided drinking disinfectant would preemptively kill any possible COVID .

He said he hears disinfectants and sunlight kills COVID and he was right about both

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry, no. When they receive free emergency room care (using it like a typical doctor’s office) , the taxpayers are footing the bill. When their children crowd the schools, the kids who are actually citizens get far less attention. We all know this. The “paying taxes” trope is absurd. Most are paid in cash, under the table, any amount of taxes taken out are minuscule. Just stop with your ridiculous excuses for importing more and more poverty.
DP

Then the GOP should have passed their own immigration reform bill that Biden said he would sign.

Trump told them not to, so they didn't.

GOP owns the issue now, and not in a good way.

If it were a serious problem, it would have been dealt with in a serious manner.

News Flash:
Trump HAD an effective border policy — until YOUR regime tore it down ON DAY ONE.

It was effective because he was breaking the law and then COVID happened and it dropped to virtually zero.

If it were a serious issue, the GOP would have passed legislation to deal with it. On several occasions since Reagan was in office, there was such an opportunity and each time, the GOP trashed it. So it is hard to take the whining seriously.

It is a serious issue, the GOP is demanding greater enforcement, and Biden’s own words on day one when he signed multiple relaxations on immigration proved where he stood on this issue. Kamala’s border failures as VP add to her political weakness on this.

Why didn’t the GOP solve this when they had a majority and could’ve? I’m sick of the dishonesty. Both republicans and democrats do not want to solve the issues they bicker about, because then they wouldn’t have anything to bicker about to appeal to voters that this will be the “last election”

Name a time the Dems scuttled an immigration bill.

(you can't because it hasn't happened)

DP. Um, you do realize that Democrats *never* come up with bills to tighten the border, right? To limit the amount of illegal immigrants entering the U.S.? But look, here's a bill that Joe and Kamala came up with that would have given 11 million illegal immigrants an eight-yr. path to citizenship. Can't imagine why this never passed!

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats proposed a major immigration overhaul Thursday that would offer an eight-year pathway to citizenship to the estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally.

The major immigration overhaul legislation would offer one of the fastest pathways to citizenship of any proposed measure in recent years, but it would do so without offering any enhanced border security, which past immigration negotiations have used as a way to win Republican votes. Without enhanced security, it faces tough odds in a closely divided Congress.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-and-congressional-democrats-to-unveil-immigration-bill

It’s interesting that the press always reports that there are 11 million illegal immigrants in the country. Doesn’t matter how many more stream in, it’s always 11 million. There’s a lot of research that says the number is quite a bit higher:

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/yale-study-finds-twice-as-many-undocumented-immigrants-as-previous-estimates

https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/study-undocumented-immigrant-population-roughly-double-current-estimate

And that was 6 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will vote for Kamala (but find her voice to be a little grating). I wonder if she ever worked with a voice coach?

Gosh, it’s so hard to choose between an annoying voice and the end of democracy in the USA! This one’s a real head-scratcher

That’s her voice. She’s a woman. What do you want her to sound like? For the record Trump sounds like a whiny bi*ch.

I’m a woman and don’t sound like her. In fact, I don’t know any women who do. Hers is a particularly grating voice that has nothing to do with her gender. And you seem really mature. DP

Really? This is your complaint about Kamala, that you don’t like her voice? And people say the term mysoginist is used too much.

What about if I say I don't like a man's voice? How about Adam Sandler? I find his voice very annoying. What does that make me? Do you understand why your "misogynist" claims are so incredibly laughable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They raised over 50 million in the few hours after Kamala was announced.

People love to waste money

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump will wipe the floor with her in a debate.

He has all but pulled out, so no, he won't.

Source? Not sure how he would have commented since she doesn’t even have the nomination yet. Obama, AOC still haven’t signaled support for her.

Are you kidding?

Look at Trump already making excuses about the September debate.

AOC has signed support.

Obama won't because he did the same thing in 2016 and 202.

DP. What "excuses"? Suggesting the venue be moved to Fox is hardly deciding to bow out.

Fox is a criminal organization. Look at the court record.

Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on Kamala! I love Joe Biden and I’m sad to see him go. I think Kamala will energize the ticket. She will give voters what they want, something new and someone young!

YES! And now TRUMP is the senile cranky grampa. Let's make something of HIS age.

And what is this rumor of J Manchin trying to switch back to a Dem to run against Harris?? He is also up there in age - 76.

He backs abortion bans, no chance.

OMG -- if you Dems can't see that you need someone like Manchin to run in order to win against Trump you are wearing blinders. So many Trump supporters would abandon him outright to support Manchin. It's called compromise. It's called unification.

+1
In addition, he absolutely supports abortion rights, even if he's personally pro-life.

https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-supports-bipartisan-effort-to-codify-roe-v-wade

Nope.

He supports putting out a statement trying to distance himself from the blood on his hands. He had the opportunity to vote to protect abortion rights and he chose to side with the Republicans. I hope he sleeps really well knowing how many women are in danger because of him.

He voted with the Republicans because the Democrats tried to take it TOO FAR. They wanted to go above and beyond what Roe guaranteed.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/596223-manchin-joins-with-senate-gop-to-block-bill-guaranteeing-abortion-access/

+1 This - Dems taking things too far is why we are where we are right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They raised over 50 million in the few hours after Kamala was announced.

This is partly what is so concerning.
Kamala never win a single presidential primary and dropped out after placing 4th in a primary in 2020, her polling numbers are abysmal, and yet she is just going to be “selected” by the elite Dems who are convinced she’ll play ball and carry on with whatever they tell her to do.
Not that they are wrong about that.
But this is not how our elections are supposed to work.
It’s almost as though the DNC is the *actual* threat to democracy.

And here this whole time we’ve been told it was Donald Trump who was trying to set up a dictatorship. Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on Kamala! I love Joe Biden and I’m sad to see him go. I think Kamala will energize the ticket. She will give voters what they want, something new and someone young!

YES! And now TRUMP is the senile cranky grampa. Let's make something of HIS age.

And what is this rumor of J Manchin trying to switch back to a Dem to run against Harris?? He is also up there in age - 76.

He backs abortion bans, no chance.

OMG -- if you Dems can't see that you need someone like Manchin to run in order to win against Trump you are wearing blinders. So many Trump supporters would abandon him outright to support Manchin. It's called compromise. It's called unification.

+1
In addition, he absolutely supports abortion rights, even if he's personally pro-life.

https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-supports-bipartisan-effort-to-codify-roe-v-wade

He is 76 years old. Did you not learn your lesson with Biden?

PP here. I'm actually a Republican who would vote for Manchin in a heartbeat.

Work on your party to replace Trump with him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahahaha

I love that all the Dems can push at this point is that you better vote for Harris because she is black and female, and that if you don't you must be a racist.

Give me a goddamn break. Does Harris have anything to offer other than being black and a female?

Good grief, she grew up her entire life in a supremely privileged household well above the mean for income. She has nothing in common with so many average Americans. Just a truly lousy candidate. You're gonna have to offer something of substance other than her race and what is between her legs, Dems.

+1
This is the threat they used with HRC - and the excuse when she lost. "Sexism"!!! They are a one-note party.

No one is saying that but you.

Ummm... there were pages and pages of people saying that when she lost - and in fact, HRC herself said it. How soon you forget.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They raised over 50 million in the few hours after Kamala was announced.

People love to waste money

That's true, but this indicates that she has real establishment backing, so who cares how they waste money?