
Isn't One Fairfax solely about race? |
That would be feasible if they just focused on the most glaring disparity in the county, which is between WSHS and Lewis, now. There could be generous grandfathering. If they change enough boundaries at the same time, just so WSHS can’t complain that it’s being singled out, the more generous grandfathering becomes logistically impossible and they’ll be forced to move kids already at their existing schools. And, yes, continue to strengthen Lewis for kids with both higher and lesser academic aspirations. The condescending WSHS posters who act like no one at Lewis has high academic goals haven’t a clue. |
Omg “a few additional kids” isn’t going to do anything for Lewis. They’d have to give them 1-2 additional feeder ES at this point. Which would only happen after the entire boundary study was completed, since the boundary policy only allows for 15% of the school’s population to be rezoned without a public hearing. |
It is about equity, which is basically about race. |
Anyone else notice SJW frequently comes on here and rapid fire posts in an attempt to seem more mainstream and relevant? |
That hearing is going to go great. |
Idk it seems like if they tried a combination of things, like adding more AP options and curtailing pupil placement in addition to rezoning a few obvious neighborhoods, that could give the school a helpful start in the right direction. This does not have to be an all or nothing approach. |
The best thing that has been done for high performing students in that pyramid is to allow transfers out. No one wants to send their kids there. |
What does this even mean lol? I am actively engaged in the discussion just like you are! Trust me, your posts in here and other threads are very obvious as well (that’s how I know you could probably benefit from a break ![]() |
It is not the WSHS parents saying this. It is the Lewis parents. |
Except you directed that to one of the many other upset parents on this thread. Maybe you are off your sjw game? |
No thanks. You know that your one outreach is going to be dwarfed by the outreach across the county from parents who don’t want this. It’s telling that you don’t want people to communicate their feelings to the board. That shows you know how immensely unpopular this thing actually is. |
Are there any examples of, or research supporting, moving higher performing students to an underperforming school having any measurable impact on [b]individual student outcomes beyond an overall increase in the average of the school's test scores? As a parent, I could possibly get behind something that truly impacts students in a measurably positive way, but I can't get behind propping up a lower performing school if it is just a numbers game in terms of test scores and accreditation. |
This is purely a play to turn a 50+% farms school into a 40+% farms school. Just an equity play. Nothing more. |
It wouldn’t even work as well as you’re saying. Lewis is 62% FARMS. Moving a neighborhood with maybe 50 HS students would make it, in all likelihood, 60% FARMS. What a difference!!!!! |