Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD's lawyer killing it on cross.

Can you summarize for those of us who can't watch?

Depp's lawyer basically tries to prove Heard is a liar and she does a pretty good job at it.
She goes over dates in which Heard claims she was abused and then shows images or video of Heard from a red carpet event or late night show usually the same day or day later in which no physical abuse is evident in the photos.
She asks Heard is there are any medical records to corroborate her abuse claims of rape or a broken nose in which she either has none, retracts her statement about her nose being broken to she really thought it was broken. She is also asked why there are no pictures submitted into evidence to prove her abuse claims in which she says it's not her job but the job of her lawyers to produce but she continues to claim they exist.
She asks Heard to clarify her donation of 7 million to 2 charities in which Heard basically says she considers donating and pledging to be the same thing and plays a clip from a Danish talk show in which Heard says she has donated all the money from her divorce but she in fact did not and says she can't because she is being sued.

This was most interesting. She claims she has pics of bruised nose and face and turned the pics over to her lawyers. When Depp's lawyer comments that she hasn't shown these pics to the jury, though, Heard states that she would love to show the pics to the jury, but that's "not her job." So, either: (1) she is lying about giving the pics to her lawyers, or (2) she gave the pics to the lawyers, but her lawyers didn't turn them over to Depp's lawyers, or, I guess, (3) the pics were turned over, but there's some reason why they're inadmissible. But Heard seems to be trying to throw her lawyers here under the bus.

This was very interesting to me as well. Either they don’t exist or they don’t really show anything.

The way she described the abuse was so violent and graphic that he broke her nose. No amount of ice would reduce the swelling in a beat down like she describes. So that’s why I do not believe her. The picture show her looking perfect and beautiful with literally not a scratch on her face.

I’ll never forget the time when I walked into my toddler‘s hand as he lifted it. It wasn’t a hard collision at all but the next day my face was swollen and it took a few days for it to come down and I had a nice purple bruise.

True. I wonder if Depp's lawyers have a MD medical witness for rebuttal, like an ER doc or ENT or maybe a plastic surgeon or orthopedic MD to talk about what one would expect to see the day after without these alleged injuries. Also a makeup artist to talk about covering wounds/bruises/ minimizing swelling and what is possible or not possible.

Also would like to know what the questions on voir dire were and if the potential jurors were asked about their experiences were with broken noses, bruises, swelling, cuts, etc .

*with* these alleged injuries. But I guess "without" works, too, depending on your assessment of the evidence...

[Anonymous]

Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

Depends on the tampon brand. Tampa pix applicators are really wide and couldn’t be used, but the lower part of a playtex applicator is much narrower than the part you insert and would easily fit into an adult nostril.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

Depends on the tampon brand. Tampa pix applicators are really wide and couldn’t be used, but the lower part of a playtex applicator is much narrower than the part you insert and would easily fit into an adult nostril.

I assume they're referring to the straw-like plunger piece.

[Anonymous]

Plenty of evidence he was violent when drunk/high but he didn't hurt her enough to require medical treatment. Is that really the standard?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD's lawyer killing it on cross.

Can you summarize for those of us who can't watch?

Depp's lawyer basically tries to prove Heard is a liar and she does a pretty good job at it.
She goes over dates in which Heard claims she was abused and then shows images or video of Heard from a red carpet event or late night show usually the same day or day later in which no physical abuse is evident in the photos.
She asks Heard is there are any medical records to corroborate her abuse claims of rape or a broken nose in which she either has none, retracts her statement about her nose being broken to she really thought it was broken. She is also asked why there are no pictures submitted into evidence to prove her abuse claims in which she says it's not her job but the job of her lawyers to produce but she continues to claim they exist.
She asks Heard to clarify her donation of 7 million to 2 charities in which Heard basically says she considers donating and pledging to be the same thing and plays a clip from a Danish talk show in which Heard says she has donated all the money from her divorce but she in fact did not and says she can't because she is being sued.

This was most interesting. She claims she has pics of bruised nose and face and turned the pics over to her lawyers. When Depp's lawyer comments that she hasn't shown these pics to the jury, though, Heard states that she would love to show the pics to the jury, but that's "not her job." So, either: (1) she is lying about giving the pics to her lawyers, or (2) she gave the pics to the lawyers, but her lawyers didn't turn them over to Depp's lawyers, or, I guess, (3) the pics were turned over, but there's some reason why they're inadmissible. But Heard seems to be trying to throw her lawyers here under the bus.

This was very interesting to me as well. Either they don’t exist or they don’t really show anything.

The way she described the abuse was so violent and graphic that he broke her nose. No amount of ice would reduce the swelling in a beat down like she describes. So that’s why I do not believe her. The picture show her looking perfect and beautiful with literally not a scratch on her face.

I’ll never forget the time when I walked into my toddler‘s hand as he lifted it. It wasn’t a hard collision at all but the next day my face was swollen and it took a few days for it to come down and I had a nice purple bruise.

Or they were deemed admissible because they could not authenticate when they were taken (e.g., if the photos were copied to an external drive before the originals were deleted by a non-lawyer, non-IT person trying to save photographic evidence but not understanding how to do it properly). Without knowing why they were not presented, the fact that they weren’t tells us nothing.

[Anonymous]

lol she stepped in it. Look at JD’s lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of evidence he was violent when drunk/high but he didn't hurt her enough to require medical treatment. Is that really the standard?

Is there evidence other than her testimony?

[Anonymous]

This cross is amazing. I feel so so sorry for Johnny Depp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This cross is amazing. I feel so so sorry for Johnny Depp.

Truly amazing. Watching her squirm is so satisfying.

[Anonymous]

Not sure we're watching the same cross. Just because you did or have done some drugs does not mean you are deep in addiction like he was, or suffered from the same problems. I understand the atty has to try to make AH look as awful as possible but it's not working for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

As someone who has never done drugs, I would assume that coke leaves a residue on the table. Am I right?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

As someone who has never done drugs, I would assume that coke leaves a residue on the table. Am I right?

DP who admittedly has not watched the trial. Do you guys not know how to clean tables? I don't know what you're talking about generally, but coke is a powder, I imagine some windex would clean it right up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you guys see the testimony regarding the photo of a glass table with lines of coke on it? I thought CV's cross examination of AH was really good. IME, that table looks too clean to have been used for what AH says it was - and, as CV noted, there were the cigarette in the ashtray was unsmoked and there were no ashes in it. But, what really got me was that she said the tampon applicator was used to snort the coke! Now, I'm post-menopausal but aren't those applicators larger than a McDonald's straw? Would a tampon applicator even fit in your nostril? I don't think it would fit in mine and you'd need a power snort to use it. What are your thoughts?

As someone who has never done drugs, I would assume that coke leaves a residue on the table. Am I right?

DP who admittedly has not watched the trial. Do you guys not know how to clean tables? I don't know what you're talking about generally, but coke is a powder, I imagine some windex would clean it right up

Like you said, you haven't watched the trial; therefore, you do not understand the context.