Read the statute for yourself. And go F yourself |
Whoa. It's actually a close call where the line is drawn. https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/may/13/it-legal-protest-outside-justices-homes-law-sugges/ |
| this thread needs to be retired. Mostly causing high BP and acid re-flux |
yep. so many trolls. |
1) The correct number is 28%. 2) What proves that they "bought the test answers" is the consistently-confirmed narrative from Curie students who were in TJ's classes of 2023 and 2024 who have repeatedly said that they had seen questions from the secured Quant-Q exam while at Curie. Not the whole exam, but certain individual questions. That point is no longer up for debate among people who are to be taken seriously. 3) If you look at how the process for selecting semifinalists in the old admissions system worked (I'll distill it down to "the exams were graded on a curve" and "you had to be in a certain percentile to make the semifinalist round"), the artificially inflated exam scores that came with the inappropriately-acquired Curie question bank without a doubt removed many otherwise-qualified students from the semifinalist pool, meaning that the Admissions Committee didn't even get a chance to pass judgment on them. I can pretty much guarantee that dozens of Asian students who did not pay thousands of dollars for access to this question bank were eliminated from the process thanks to Curie's score inflation. |
I agree that the way the Quant-Q was handled by Curie and TJ admissions was problematic, and eliminating the test was a good idea. Eliminating the rest of the comprehensive packet, however, was a terrible move. Someone keeps posting the falsehood that any kid could buy their way into TJ via Curie. That is not the case. The kids still needed a strong packet to get through the holistic review. If, in theory, a kid bought the entire Quant-Q from Curie (which they did not. At best, the kids saw a couple questions and got training on similar styles of questions), but was otherwise mediocre, that kid would have made Semifinalist, but then not been awarded a seat at TJ. |
Most people agree (based on previous posts) that a max of 25-50 kids are of the caliber who need or can leverage the facilities provided at TJ. The new process seems to miss more of these type of kids (no references but discussions in this board) than the previous. People can "pretend" to be in the top 25-50 based on the un-verified facts (stories) written in the essay. Most of the top kids will be bad (boring for them) in bragging/essay-writing. |
The data and I are going to have to disagree with you again. TJ Admissions used to publish on their slides for Admissions Information Sessions the average test percentiles for students at various levels of the process. Overall applicants, semifinalists, and those offered admission. There was a significant delta between the semifinalists and those offered admission in all three exams, suggesting that the exam score was a major factor in the holistic review. And who could blame the committee for this? And guess what? By far, the biggest delta between the performance of semifinalists and offers was on the Quant-Q. It was adopted as a secured exam, it was the single biggest separator at both the first and second thresholds of selection - and it was compromised. |
The Quant-Q is a fantastic exam that is extremely valuable as long as those sitting for the exam have not seen the question types before. It is designed specifically to evaluate how individuals handle quantitative reasoning problems that they've never seen before. It becomes less than useless if the people taking the exam have been told previously how to solve the problems it asks. The exam was mishandled by two entities - Curie Learning Centers and their former clients who ran back to them with the test questions memorized after signing a statement agreeing not to discuss it. |
So, you have data showing that kids with mediocre packets were offered admissions based solely on their test scores? Please share it. There are 3 groups of kids with high Quant-Q scores: The naturally gifted, the prep kids who also have strong packets, and the prep kids who have weak packets. Admitting the first and second groups, for the most part deservedly so, would lead to exactly the data that you're citing. There is no evidence that any kids from the third group were admitted to TJ in the old system. They're definitely getting in now, so great job with the reforms! |
Thanks you for clearing this up. |
Seems like people are commenting on their own posts. That's ok. And this whole blaming of a prep center is a distraction. One thing though is still unclear to me. If all this prep center stuff was so bad, why can't a test be set up with non standard but challenging questions? Is it because of lack of capability or intent? |
A prominent and highly esteemed local math teacher offered to write precisely this type of test for TJ. They declined the offer. They don’t want a test, since any test at all would be detrimental to their main goal: reducing Asian students. |
Checkmate time to close the thread For the final time this all started because NAACP wanted more black kids accepted. That expanded to more lower-income folks as well to try and hide the real intentions. |
| As a Taxpayer I wish they would shut TJ down. It's been scammed for years. Let's kids go to their own neighborhood school. |