Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."

+1
I think he was very candid about his partying ways. He even said he had done stupid things that he regretted (like most teenagers). He never tried to paint himself as a "choirboy." PP really is a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!

The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.

Murkowski seems less convinced than you do.

https://mobile.twitter.com/matthewdalywdc/status/1047179686651088904

NYTimes is reporting they are completing tomorrow.

Unlikely.

[Anonymous]

Trump was mocking Dr. Ford in Mississippi tonight. What a disgusting piece of s*it he is. The Republicans must be replaced and Kavanaugh then impeached and tossed to the gutter where he belongs.

[Anonymous]

Candid? Ha

He evaded, avoided and brought up other things instead of answering questions!!!

Have you been black out drunlk?
Let me tell you about high school! I went to Yale!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!

The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.

Murkowski seems less convinced than you do.

https://mobile.twitter.com/matthewdalywdc/status/1047179686651088904

NYTimes is reporting they are completing tomorrow.

Just read the article. There are a whole lot of people wanting to give statements that haven’t received a response. So I say the FBI is done when Collins, Murkowski, and Flake say they are done, and not before. Flake said he was NOT interested in a fake investigation for political cover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it permitted to say that I think Ford is lying though her teeth? Not confused, not traumatized, not mixed up, just stone-cold lying.

But why on Earth would she do this! Did you see her? I'm dumbfounded at the cruelty people have directed at her.

Not the PP, but are you serious? I haven't seen anything cruel written about her. Quite the opposite, actually. Lots of fawning.

Your President just launched a tirade at her followed by chants of "Lock Her Up".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was mocking Dr. Ford in Mississippi tonight. What a disgusting piece of s*it he is. The Republicans must be replaced and Kavanaugh then impeached and tossed to the gutter where he belongs.

Yep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."

+1
I think he was very candid about his partying ways. He even said he had done stupid things that he regretted (like most teenagers). He never tried to paint himself as a "choirboy." PP really is a liar.

No he wasn’t! He only came out with the beer stuff later. Gheesh, how quickly Kavanaugh apologists forget.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."

+1
I think he was very candid about his partying ways. He even said he had done stupid things that he regretted (like most teenagers). He never tried to paint himself as a "choirboy." PP really is a liar.

No he wasn’t! He only came out with the beer stuff later. Gheesh, how quickly Kavanaugh apologists forget.

Apparently pp has forgotten the fox interview. BTW it was entered in to the record at the hearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was mocking Dr. Ford in Mississippi tonight. What a disgusting piece of s*it he is. The Republicans must be replaced and Kavanaugh then impeached and tossed to the gutter where he belongs.

And his toadies have fanned out across the networks to echo his new talking point: what hard times these are for white boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence of bad behavior by Kavanaugh...

In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.

2

I've got a question about these allegations. Wasn't it Ramirez who spent six days calling, texting, emailing her Yale buddies to try and decide whether it was Kavanaugh who exposed himself? And in doing so, isn't it obvious that she actually had no real memory of Kavanaugh doing this?
I'm sure Kavanaugh was alerted by mutual friends to Ramirez's intent to smear him. How is it fair to say it's perfectly fine for her to drum up friends' support about something that may (or may not) have occurred (she isn't even positive herself, for crying out loud), but that Kavanaugh is not to talk to *his* friends about supporting him?

What an incredible double standard.

Because he's applying for the highest court of the land, so his behavior should be impeccable, unquestionable. Not problematic.

Agreed. Obama should never be allowed on the Supreme Court.

Tee hee, you're really worried about that happening, aren't you? That would be the greatest thing ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted this near the end of thread 3. I’m curious what Kavanaugh supporters think, particularly of the last paragraph.

“I honestly don’t know who is telling the truth. I don’t believe her blindly, but I also don’t think she’s involved in some big conspiracy (even if one is happening around her.) And certainly some people screwed the pooch procedurally here.

All that said, his behavior on Thursday was absolutely horrific and completely unbecoming of a Supreme Court Justice. He is hot tempered and blatantly partisan. Yes, lots of people in the room were being partisan, but he was the only one trying to become a Supreme Court Justice.”

As I’ve said before, if he had been polite and answered the questions cordially and directly, this would all be over. He has humiliated himself and shown he can’t remain calm and impartial in tense situations.”

Up until this morning I felt the same way as you, I didn't necessarily know who was telling the truth. After the Rachel Mitchell memo I am inclined to believe BK. there are too many loopholes in her story some of which make me think she is intentionally being dishonest. That being said I think his explanations of the meanings of his yearbook statements amounts to perjury and he probably did himself in on that alone. However, I do not believe he assaulted Christine Ford.

The Rachel Mitchell memo is insignificant. You are falling for political BS. She is saying she doesn't have the evidence to take it to court. And how would she? She was not even permitted to have an interview with Kavanaugh? do you know how many cases where there IS evidence that the prosecutor refuses to take to court? The only take things where they are pretty sure they will get a conviction.

She never ever ever says that she thinks he is innocent.

You should read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/opinions/arlington-texas/?utm_term=.5ba1f80d92bc

Most sexual assaults are not reported. The ones that are mostly NEVER go to trial. It DOES NOT MEAN THEY DID NOT HAPPEN.

In this case, he could have done it. He should not be on the SC if he could have done it. We don't give positions to people who could have done it. Would you hire a tutor who MAYBE slept with his/her last student? Would you hire a housekeeper who MAYBE stole jewelry from her last employer?

NO YOU WOULD NOT.

And, to the poster who wanted to know why the future is scary for young men.....

Read the bolded paragraph above. It is all about IF. If he could have done it. If he is guilty. If, If, If.....
Despite the fact that the only 3 people who were reportedly there have failed to corroborate her claims, and her dear friend doesn’t even know Kavanaugh.....he should be subject to penalty because.... IF.
This is why young men should be scared. Because, all it takes is an allegation.

Enough with all young men being scared. All men don't have to be scared. The people who are scared are the men who behaved like they were in Animal House when they were younger. Too drunk to control themselves. Mistreated women. Any guy who acted like the stuff they are saying BK did is getting nervous? Fine with me.

Women and POC have been scared for years...decades...centuries, putting up with men who mistreat them for their own amusement and having little to NO recourse.

So pardon me while I don't cry a river for some white dude who acted like an ass in his teens and twenties having a moment of fear about what he might have done.

I have a father, brothers, male cousins, sons that I love. I'm not worried for them. They don't act like assholes.

Nor do they need to. All it takes is one false accusation.

+1 and then all the "might have done it" accusations

[Anonymous]

Letter from Ford’s former boyfriend. It’s pretty damning.

They dated for 6 yrs, never told of sex assault, Ford coached friend on taking polygraph, flew frequently w/o expressing any fear of flying/tight spaces/limited exits. Doesn’t want to b/c “involved”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was mocking Dr. Ford in Mississippi tonight. What a disgusting piece of s*it he is. The Republicans must be replaced and Kavanaugh then impeached and tossed to the gutter where he belongs.

Yep

Trump and all of his supporters are disgusting POSs.

Simply repulsive in every way possible.

[Anonymous]

CNN just reported the FBI investigation is expanding.