
What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder. |
Are you the PP who is connected via LinkedIn to her counsel, or who first pointed out the video and audio shows the young man hadn’t rented the bike? If either, thank you. You helped end some of the crazy directed at this woman. |
I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again. |
We don’t know that they are boys. We don’t know that they are minors. |
Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath. |
Are you the person who thinks that Meghan Markle posts on DCUM defending herself |
I don’t particularly want to participate in any of this but I find myself defending her on other platforms. It really is astonishing. |
It’s been explained to you time and time again that SOME of the pieces of evidence provided to the public have been partially redacted, presumably for her and her family’s safety and perhaps to ensure that bad actors don’t edit these pieces of info to make her look guilty. Of course her attorney has the un redacted/original versions and probably some other time stamps and information from the bike rental company itself, that has not been released to the media and the public yet. I am sure that the judges will see all the unredacted/unblurred originals, however the media and the general public will probably not as it will be kept silent as part of a settlement agreement. The media and online outlets who took this short, edited video and ran with it to defame the PA are going to have to pay up and hopefully that is a deterrent for the future the next time this happens. I noticed WaPo didn’t cover it after the Covington Catholic fiasco. |
I just want to re-clarify for the trolls screaming about the redacted time stamp: the internet mob has published her full address in multiple places, not just twitter. She has been threatened. She’s had her reputation destroyed and her character maligned. This has cost her so much already as she enters her third tri. It’s really really wrong. |
No, that's not me. But I thank her, too. |
Same! I'm the pp fighting with the dog-whistle pp. I usually don't engage in this sort of thing. But the treatment of this woman is so outrageous. |
Oh, that’s me. I’m still here and still closely following the case. |
I doubt Judge believes her own narrative. But she knows she’s getting the most attention she’ll ever get in her life. |
I'm just glad to see the PA has made more in the past 2 days in her fundraiser than Monique will make all year. I wish her luck in her future lawsuits too. |
DP. I would like to take credit for being first in the thread to point out that he was covering up the QR code, and that the bike isn’t undocked (rented) until the confrontation is already underway. That said, I reread the first few pages of the thread, and there were multiple posters not accepting the “narrative” that she was “stealing a bike and fake crying.” One really disturbing thing in this whole sordid mess is how a few news outlets (NBC and possibly others) posted stories about this incident at first that literally just repeated what the crazy tweets said about the stealing and fake crying. They made zero attempt to even try to look at it objectively. DCUM had a credible alternative explanation within 1 hour. We’re not some geniuses! I really do hope she sues NBC for that first article. I get that they do shoddy “journalism” for clicks, but that doesn’t give them the right to destroy someone’s life through false accusations. |