Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I doubt Judge believes her own narrative. But she knows she’s getting the most attention she’ll ever get in her life.

Over 10k people have viewed her most inflammatory tweets, in some cases 20k. And her likes for these tweets are still in the double digits. She's had to block from commenting anybody who she doesn't herself follow. Her tweet claiming "it's not about the bike or who rented it, it's about her actions" got 24k views and 170 likes. That should tell her something.

I only post these stats because they restore my faith in the vast majority of humanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How terrible. A bunch of men ganging up on a pregnant woman? I guess all of these men grew up in a home without a father and weren’t taught how to respect women. They simply don’t know any better.

No wonder workers don’t want to come back FT to offices in Manhattan. Living and working from home from CT or Westchester is a much better option and way safer. Way fewer dudes who will even argue with a pregnant woman about a bike.

There’s that dog whistle again. You just can’t help yourself.

But sadly it’s true. Any man raised in a good home with decent values doesn’t try to take a bike from a pregnant woman. You’re likely defensive and angry because you know it’s true.

DP. You're making broad generalizations about another race, and that's just wrong. I agree the guys are scum, but no need to seize on that to make a racist point.

But instead of the men's terrible behavior, let's focus on the behavior of the victim and how she didn't react appropriately enough. Let's talk about "fake tears" and calling for help because she wanted something to happen to them. Did you call out the men's bad behavior at any point? If not, why should anyone care about any feeble point you're trying to make?

Yes. I posted above that the men are scum and I said this was about white women, not just about white people.

What I’m saying now is, let’s not get in the gutter with the anti-white, misogynistic racists. We can do better.

Oh, now it's a bad idea. It was ok until the truth came out though I guess. That's how this thread started, if you recall.

And I didn’t participate until late in the thread, until after the receipts came out, and then I was very supportive of her.

What’s wrong with you? For the record, I think people like Monique Judge and the earlier posters attacking her need to apologize (and some but not all have), if that’s what you’re looking for.

It's wrong to point out that the first 40 pages of this thread never should have existed? If she had been another race it wouldn't have made it past 2 pages.

This.

I think I’m in a little shock that the proof and local news interview of her attorney has not quashed the vitriol of the terminally online. It’s actually really shocking to me.

Which is why her attorney has said he has a "list" of people to sue that includes not just media but personalities, presumably including Crump and Monique Judge. The attorney even gave Judge a chance to back down and she just dug in deeper. I think that's entirely appropriate--go after the people who used their huge platforms to make this go viral.

-- pp who has been in a terminal back-and-forth with dog whistle pp

Are you the PP who is connected via LinkedIn to her counsel, or who first pointed out the video and audio shows the young man hadn’t rented the bike? If either, thank you. You helped end some of the crazy directed at this woman.

No, that's not me. But I thank her, too.

DP. I would like to take credit for being first in the thread to point out that he was covering up the QR code, and that the bike isn’t undocked (rented) until the confrontation is already underway.

That said, I reread the first few pages of the thread, and there were multiple posters not accepting the “narrative” that she was “stealing a bike and fake crying.”

One really disturbing thing in this whole sordid mess is how a few news outlets (NBC and possibly others) posted stories about this incident at first that literally just repeated what the crazy tweets said about the stealing and fake crying. They made zero attempt to even try to look at it objectively. DCUM had a credible alternative explanation within 1 hour. We’re not some geniuses!

I really do hope she sues NBC for that first article. I get that they do shoddy “journalism” for clicks, but that doesn’t give them the right to destroy someone’s life through false accusations.

I’m the person connected to your lawyer. Your posts are what pushed me to follow things more closely and push back on other platforms/within my own professional circle.

She has very strong cases against many people and outlets but especially The Root and Yahoo, both of which claimed she was committing attempted theft, rather than that she is being accused of attempted theft. Which as I recall NBC hedged on more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How terrible. A bunch of men ganging up on a pregnant woman? I guess all of these men grew up in a home without a father and weren’t taught how to respect women. They simply don’t know any better.

No wonder workers don’t want to come back FT to offices in Manhattan. Living and working from home from CT or Westchester is a much better option and way safer. Way fewer dudes who will even argue with a pregnant woman about a bike.

There’s that dog whistle again. You just can’t help yourself.

But sadly it’s true. Any man raised in a good home with decent values doesn’t try to take a bike from a pregnant woman. You’re likely defensive and angry because you know it’s true.

DP. You're making broad generalizations about another race, and that's just wrong. I agree the guys are scum, but no need to seize on that to make a racist point.

But instead of the men's terrible behavior, let's focus on the behavior of the victim and how she didn't react appropriately enough. Let's talk about "fake tears" and calling for help because she wanted something to happen to them. Did you call out the men's bad behavior at any point? If not, why should anyone care about any feeble point you're trying to make?

Yes. I posted above that the men are scum and I said this was about white women, not just about white people.

What I’m saying now is, let’s not get in the gutter with the anti-white, misogynistic racists. We can do better.

Oh, now it's a bad idea. It was ok until the truth came out though I guess. That's how this thread started, if you recall.

And I didn’t participate until late in the thread, until after the receipts came out, and then I was very supportive of her.

What’s wrong with you? For the record, I think people like Monique Judge and the earlier posters attacking her need to apologize (and some but not all have), if that’s what you’re looking for.

It's wrong to point out that the first 40 pages of this thread never should have existed? If she had been another race it wouldn't have made it past 2 pages.

This.

I think I’m in a little shock that the proof and local news interview of her attorney has not quashed the vitriol of the terminally online. It’s actually really shocking to me.

Which is why her attorney has said he has a "list" of people to sue that includes not just media but personalities, presumably including Crump and Monique Judge. The attorney even gave Judge a chance to back down and she just dug in deeper. I think that's entirely appropriate--go after the people who used their huge platforms to make this go viral.

-- pp who has been in a terminal back-and-forth with dog whistle pp

Are you the PP who is connected via LinkedIn to her counsel, or who first pointed out the video and audio shows the young man hadn’t rented the bike? If either, thank you. You helped end some of the crazy directed at this woman.

No, that's not me. But I thank her, too.

DP. I would like to take credit for being first in the thread to point out that he was covering up the QR code, and that the bike isn’t undocked (rented) until the confrontation is already underway.

That said, I reread the first few pages of the thread, and there were multiple posters not accepting the “narrative” that she was “stealing a bike and fake crying.”

One really disturbing thing in this whole sordid mess is how a few news outlets (NBC and possibly others) posted stories about this incident at first that literally just repeated what the crazy tweets said about the stealing and fake crying. They made zero attempt to even try to look at it objectively. DCUM had a credible alternative explanation within 1 hour. We’re not some geniuses!

I really do hope she sues NBC for that first article. I get that they do shoddy “journalism” for clicks, but that doesn’t give them the right to destroy someone’s life through false accusations.

I’m the person connected to your lawyer. Your posts are what pushed me to follow things more closely and push back on other platforms/within my own professional circle.

She has very strong cases against many people and outlets but especially The Root and Yahoo, both of which claimed she was committing attempted theft, rather than that she is being accused of attempted theft. Which as I recall NBC hedged on more.

*her lawyer not yours! Ha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How terrible. A bunch of men ganging up on a pregnant woman? I guess all of these men grew up in a home without a father and weren’t taught how to respect women. They simply don’t know any better.

No wonder workers don’t want to come back FT to offices in Manhattan. Living and working from home from CT or Westchester is a much better option and way safer. Way fewer dudes who will even argue with a pregnant woman about a bike.

There’s that dog whistle again. You just can’t help yourself.

But sadly it’s true. Any man raised in a good home with decent values doesn’t try to take a bike from a pregnant woman. You’re likely defensive and angry because you know it’s true.

DP. You're making broad generalizations about another race, and that's just wrong. I agree the guys are scum, but no need to seize on that to make a racist point.

But instead of the men's terrible behavior, let's focus on the behavior of the victim and how she didn't react appropriately enough. Let's talk about "fake tears" and calling for help because she wanted something to happen to them. Did you call out the men's bad behavior at any point? If not, why should anyone care about any feeble point you're trying to make?

Yes. I posted above that the men are scum and I said this was about white women, not just about white people.

What I’m saying now is, let’s not get in the gutter with the anti-white, misogynistic racists. We can do better.

Oh, now it's a bad idea. It was ok until the truth came out though I guess. That's how this thread started, if you recall.

And I didn’t participate until late in the thread, until after the receipts came out, and then I was very supportive of her.

What’s wrong with you? For the record, I think people like Monique Judge and the earlier posters attacking her need to apologize (and some but not all have), if that’s what you’re looking for.

It's wrong to point out that the first 40 pages of this thread never should have existed? If she had been another race it wouldn't have made it past 2 pages.

This.

I think I’m in a little shock that the proof and local news interview of her attorney has not quashed the vitriol of the terminally online. It’s actually really shocking to me.

Which is why her attorney has said he has a "list" of people to sue that includes not just media but personalities, presumably including Crump and Monique Judge. The attorney even gave Judge a chance to back down and she just dug in deeper. I think that's entirely appropriate--go after the people who used their huge platforms to make this go viral.

-- pp who has been in a terminal back-and-forth with dog whistle pp

Are you the PP who is connected via LinkedIn to her counsel, or who first pointed out the video and audio shows the young man hadn’t rented the bike? If either, thank you. You helped end some of the crazy directed at this woman.

No, that's not me. But I thank her, too.

DP. I would like to take credit for being first in the thread to point out that he was covering up the QR code, and that the bike isn’t undocked (rented) until the confrontation is already underway.

That said, I reread the first few pages of the thread, and there were multiple posters not accepting the “narrative” that she was “stealing a bike and fake crying.”

One really disturbing thing in this whole sordid mess is how a few news outlets (NBC and possibly others) posted stories about this incident at first that literally just repeated what the crazy tweets said about the stealing and fake crying. They made zero attempt to even try to look at it objectively. DCUM had a credible alternative explanation within 1 hour. We’re not some geniuses!

I really do hope she sues NBC for that first article. I get that they do shoddy “journalism” for clicks, but that doesn’t give them the right to destroy someone’s life through false accusations.

It wasn’t even just that they repeated all the allegations but they also visited her home and talked to her neighbors etc. And showed her apartment complex and even her apartment location in the segment. Locals will recognize it easily.

Total harassment, and so completely unacceptable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How terrible. A bunch of men ganging up on a pregnant woman? I guess all of these men grew up in a home without a father and weren’t taught how to respect women. They simply don’t know any better.

No wonder workers don’t want to come back FT to offices in Manhattan. Living and working from home from CT or Westchester is a much better option and way safer. Way fewer dudes who will even argue with a pregnant woman about a bike.

There’s that dog whistle again. You just can’t help yourself.

But sadly it’s true. Any man raised in a good home with decent values doesn’t try to take a bike from a pregnant woman. You’re likely defensive and angry because you know it’s true.

DP. You're making broad generalizations about another race, and that's just wrong. I agree the guys are scum, but no need to seize on that to make a racist point.

But instead of the men's terrible behavior, let's focus on the behavior of the victim and how she didn't react appropriately enough. Let's talk about "fake tears" and calling for help because she wanted something to happen to them. Did you call out the men's bad behavior at any point? If not, why should anyone care about any feeble point you're trying to make?

Yes. I posted above that the men are scum and I said this was about white women, not just about white people.

What I’m saying now is, let’s not get in the gutter with the anti-white, misogynistic racists. We can do better.

Oh, now it's a bad idea. It was ok until the truth came out though I guess. That's how this thread started, if you recall.

And I didn’t participate until late in the thread, until after the receipts came out, and then I was very supportive of her.

What’s wrong with you? For the record, I think people like Monique Judge and the earlier posters attacking her need to apologize (and some but not all have), if that’s what you’re looking for.

It's wrong to point out that the first 40 pages of this thread never should have existed? If she had been another race it wouldn't have made it past 2 pages.

This.

I think I’m in a little shock that the proof and local news interview of her attorney has not quashed the vitriol of the terminally online. It’s actually really shocking to me.

Which is why her attorney has said he has a "list" of people to sue that includes not just media but personalities, presumably including Crump and Monique Judge. The attorney even gave Judge a chance to back down and she just dug in deeper. I think that's entirely appropriate--go after the people who used their huge platforms to make this go viral.

-- pp who has been in a terminal back-and-forth with dog whistle pp

Are you the PP who is connected via LinkedIn to her counsel, or who first pointed out the video and audio shows the young man hadn’t rented the bike? If either, thank you. You helped end some of the crazy directed at this woman.

No, that's not me. But I thank her, too.

DP. I would like to take credit for being first in the thread to point out that he was covering up the QR code, and that the bike isn’t undocked (rented) until the confrontation is already underway.

That said, I reread the first few pages of the thread, and there were multiple posters not accepting the “narrative” that she was “stealing a bike and fake crying.”

One really disturbing thing in this whole sordid mess is how a few news outlets (NBC and possibly others) posted stories about this incident at first that literally just repeated what the crazy tweets said about the stealing and fake crying. They made zero attempt to even try to look at it objectively. DCUM had a credible alternative explanation within 1 hour. We’re not some geniuses!

I really do hope she sues NBC for that first article. I get that they do shoddy “journalism” for clicks, but that doesn’t give them the right to destroy someone’s life through false accusations.

I’m the person connected to your lawyer. Your posts are what pushed me to follow things more closely and push back on other platforms/within my own professional circle.

She has very strong cases against many people and outlets but especially The Root and Yahoo, both of which claimed she was committing attempted theft, rather than that she is being accused of attempted theft. Which as I recall NBC hedged on more.

Good for you.

[Anonymous]

^ It was NBC who visited her apartment and talked to the neighbors and told them about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^ It was NBC who visited her apartment and talked to the neighbors and told them about her.

Crazy toxic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

You are making things up now in desperation. Remarkable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

You are making things up now in desperation. Remarkable.

Ben Crump, not the PA's attorney Marino, is the one who sued Sheeran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

You are making things up now in desperation. Remarkable.

Ben Crump, not the PA's attorney Marino, is the one who sued Sheeran.

My mistake, I thought that post referred to the PA’s attorney.

Ben Crump is starting to risk his license and appropriately so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

You are making things up now in desperation. Remarkable.

Ben Crump, not the PA's attorney Marino, is the one who sued Sheeran.

My mistake, I thought that post referred to the PA’s attorney.

Ben Crump is starting to risk his license and appropriately so.

Yes I was talking about Crump! Marino appears totally solid. The only thing Monica Judge et al can accuse him of is being an “employment lawyer” lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I doubt Judge believes her own narrative. But she knows she’s getting the most attention she’ll ever get in her life.

Over 10k people have viewed her most inflammatory tweets, in some cases 20k. And her likes for these tweets are still in the double digits. She's had to block from commenting anybody who she doesn't herself follow. Her tweet claiming "it's not about the bike or who rented it, it's about her actions" got 24k views and 170 likes. That should tell her something.

I only post these stats because they restore my faith in the vast majority of humanity.

Right- 10k views. I think she likes the attention, even if everyone- including herself- knows she’s spouting nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So because I don’t believe her that makes me a racist and and a misogynist?? Oh…ok, whatever!

Refusing to believe her in the face of the evidence supporting her makes you racist and misogynist, yes. Glad you figured that out.

What evidence?? A receipt with a blurred out time stamp??? That video is evidence of her poor behavior, nothing more. Try harder.

I only see boys harassing a woman in that video. You should put your glasses on and watch again.

Don’t bother. I think there’s a very good chance that PP is Monique Judge. She’s so invested in her false narrative she will never ever give up. She’ll get sued, lose, and still say she was right. You’re wasting your breath.

I don’t know why she’s not kicked of Twitter already. Her and that racist lawyer.

the same lawyer who also tried to get a payday out of Ed Sheerhan and got his b*tt handed to him. Maybe he will also be on the hook for Sheerhan’s attorney fees.

You are making things up now in desperation. Remarkable.

Ben Crump, not the PA's attorney Marino, is the one who sued Sheeran.

My mistake, I thought that post referred to the PA’s attorney.

Ben Crump is starting to risk his license and appropriately so.

Yes I was talking about Crump! Marino appears totally solid. The only thing Monica Judge et al can accuse him of is being an “employment lawyer” lol.

DP. It is pretty funny to me that she’s said that in a very dun-dun-DUNNNNNN tone. He has no credibility BECAUSW he’s an employment lawyer people! Hee.