Bower's top education aide sends his kids to 100 percent open private school

[Anonymous]

I can’t believe this is anyone’s concern but that man and his family. You can not control other people’s decisions and homes. There is no moral or ethical issue with this. The DCUM ED mob is the worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe this is anyone’s concern but that man and his family. You can not control other people’s decisions and homes. There is no moral or ethical issue with this. The DCUM ED mob is the worst.

He's a public servant whose decisions affect many of our lives. So yes, we have a right to question how his own actions affect his decision-making. He clearly thinks in-person learning is okay for his family but not okay for thousands of other DC families.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it possible they are distance learning at the private school? Still though lack of faith in public school looks bad for his position. Didn’t her last pick get in trouble for switching their kid to Wilson? Why does she pick these people knowing these things?

Most private schools have been 100 percent open since September.

Not true at all. That’s only true for some parochials. The rest opened in hybrid—my upper elementary kid didn’t get any in-person until mid-Nov. Just check out the parents who’ve been complaining about not getting more in person in the private forum.

The vast majority of privates have been open five days since the beginning of the school year.

Again, incorrect. Most opened in some sort of hybrid, with more in-person time for the youngest students.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/921759.page

Well, the school in question, WIS, has been open since the beginning of the year

Even assuming that is true, that is very different than the "vast majority of privates have been open."

Private schools with virtual learning have been the exception

Again, that's not true unless you are focusing only on parochial schools, and even that is a stretch. You are also, again, shifting the goal posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe this is anyone’s concern but that man and his family. You can not control other people’s decisions and homes. There is no moral or ethical issue with this. The DCUM ED mob is the worst.

I think you're missing the point. The issue is that he argues it's unsafe to open schools and is preventing our kids from getting a decent education. Even as his own kids go to school every single day and have since the beginning of the year.

[Anonymous]

He needs to be fired. Public education officials should be required to send their kids to public schools. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe this is anyone’s concern but that man and his family. You can not control other people’s decisions and homes. There is no moral or ethical issue with this. The DCUM ED mob is the worst.

I think you're missing the point. The issue is that he argues it's unsafe to open schools and is preventing our kids from getting a decent education. Even as his own kids go to school every single day and have since the beginning of the year.

Does anyone have an actual recent quote that he has said it’s unsafe to open public schools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He needs to be fired. Public education officials should be required to send their kids to public schools. Period.

Honestly, this is on the mayor. He is her deputy. You can say what you want but she is not leading here AT ALL.

[Anonymous]

Normally I would agree that home and family decisions should not be discussed or considered relevant to a public officials job performance. But this situation is different. He is publicly supporting keeping kids out of school for safety reasons but is sending his own kids to school. It doesn't make sense and it is hypocritical. If he feels schools are so unsafe, his kids should be choosing the virtual school option that WIS is offering. But he didn't. Or, he could support a return to school. But he isn't. He needs to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Normally I would agree that home and family decisions should not be discussed or considered relevant to a public officials job performance. But this situation is different. He is publicly supporting keeping kids out of school for safety reasons but is sending his own kids to school. It doesn't make sense and it is hypocritical. If he feels schools are so unsafe, his kids should be choosing the virtual school option that WIS is offering. But he didn't. Or, he could support a return to school. But he isn't. He needs to go.

I haven't read every post from this thread. How has he publicly supported keeping kids out of school? It's interesting that this thread has put all reopening blame on his shoulders, when the WTU has blocked any reopening plans since the Fall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Normally I would agree that home and family decisions should not be discussed or considered relevant to a public officials job performance. But this situation is different. He is publicly supporting keeping kids out of school for safety reasons but is sending his own kids to school. It doesn't make sense and it is hypocritical. If he feels schools are so unsafe, his kids should be choosing the virtual school option that WIS is offering. But he didn't. Or, he could support a return to school. But he isn't. He needs to go.

I haven't read every post from this thread. How has he publicly supported keeping kids out of school? It's interesting that this thread has put all reopening blame on his shoulders, when the WTU has blocked any reopening plans since the Fall.

+1, I’d also like to know this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so the guy elects to send his kids to private school. Bowser supports him. She's won the last two elections. What can we do about it, other than try to prevent her from winning again? Nothing. Wealthy people in this city, the types who earn 200K plus, almost always send their kids to private schools. That's the way it's always been, and, presumably, always will be. Move on.

Families who earn $200k do not spend $92k after taxes on private school.

Also, if you want to be in charge of PUBLIC schools, you have no business doing so if your own children are too good for them.

Facts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so the guy elects to send his kids to private school. Bowser supports him. She's won the last two elections. What can we do about it, other than try to prevent her from winning again? Nothing. Wealthy people in this city, the types who earn 200K plus, almost always send their kids to private schools. That's the way it's always been, and, presumably, always will be. Move on.

Families who earn $200k do not spend $92k after taxes on private school.

Also, if you want to be in charge of PUBLIC schools, you have no business doing so if your own children are too good for them.

Facts

Ahh the "It's always been this way" argument, shrug your shoulders and deal with it. As PP alluded to, he is a HYPOCRITE. Bowser should not have appointed him - she got all starry eyed with the BS illusion that somehow his pedigree from Mckinsey and where ever he went to college makes him somehow smarter than everyone else. Such a predictable pattern of privilege putting in the time and moving up in the ranks. Good thing for his kids that his has them on the same track.

[Anonymous]

By this logic should DCPS principals and teachers be barred from having their children in private school? I know a number where that is the case. Or live outside of DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:By this logic should DCPS principals and teachers be barred from having their children in private school? I know a number where that is the case. Or live outside of DC.

If DCPS principals are making $150 or more there is a residency requirement, no reason there shouldn't be a similar requirement for sending your kids to public schools. What this guy is doing, though is just gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe this is anyone’s concern but that man and his family. You can not control other people’s decisions and homes. There is no moral or ethical issue with this. The DCUM ED mob is the worst.

I think you're missing the point. The issue is that he argues it's unsafe to open schools and is preventing our kids from getting a decent education. Even as his own kids go to school every single day and have since the beginning of the year.

Does anyone have an actual recent quote that he has said it’s unsafe to open public schools?

He clearly hasn’t done anything to stand up for having them open, not publicly or effectively. That’s enough.