When I was in first grade I wanted to be a strawberry picker. Actually I might have liked doing that... |
An earlier post made very clear that I am fully aware of the history of police abuse and have no delusions that what occurred is anything unique. But, what is unique is that people seem to finally really be paying attention and there is actually a groundswell of support for making change, hopefully of a meaningful variety. MSP voted to disband their police department. Many other municipalities are voting to defund their police and make other meaningful reforms. However, it is critical that people remain vigilant and make sure that the current momentum the movement enjoys doesn't whither as people move on to different things. After Ferguson or other police abuses, there were protests and those on the fringe left pushed for reforms. But those protests never captured centrists and those on the center left and therefore never really had the opportunity to make a tangible difference. So, to take an arguably hostile step at this time, when real change may be possible, is particular concerning. |
Wait, OP... are you saying that parents sharing videos of their preschool children saying they want to be police officers as part of a class project on what children want to be when they grow up,is a “hostile step”?
|
PP here. It’s obviously hostile. It’s the equivalent of “all lives matter.” |
I will say that if this were me, I would have redirected my child if this was post-Floyd's death, because I wouldn't have wanted people to think I was sending some kind of message. If I had sent in the video and it had not yet been shared, I would have gone back and forth on whether to ask the teacher to share a substitute video instead; I probably would have, but realize that would have been way more awkward.
I'm lucky my kid wants to be a lawyer, specifically so she can come to the office and eat the same lunch as me every day. |
Dear OP, I hope you will read my comment. I think you mean well and are trying to save kid some embarrassment in present day climate. However, what you are actually proposing is censoring a preschooler's assignment. Telling the kid that there is a right assignment and the unacceptable assignment. What kind of societies control kids' homework and thought process? Isn't that exactly what you are against when protest against police violence? Isn't that exactly what much of the fight between democrats and Trump supporters is about? I think leader is trying to institute a dictatorships, and his supporters think that democrats are trying to institute dictatorships.
If we start telling our kids that you can only think this way when they are in preschool, what are we doing exactly? |
+1 |
OP, I am going to come at this at a slightly different approach. I disagree with you on whether it was inappropriate for these parents to include their children's statements to this effect in a preschool video. However, the rights and wrongs of these matter less than your entitled approach that these people owe you a dialogue justifying their decision. They don't. These are parents of kids who happen to go to the same preschool who you know casually. They don't have to justify themselves to you. You are certainly allowed to privately disapprove of their decision, which, at best, the rights of which are debatable among reasonable minds. Let these people alone and put your energy toward something more constructive. Volunteer, give money to support BLM, donate to bail funds. Let this go. |
This IS a troll! Don't feed it! |
I've never said that they owe me a conversation. I've said that I think it was of questionable judgement to use those particular videos at this specific moment in time. I think it could send a message, likely unintended but who knows, that they do not support BLM and current police efforts. I've said I have considered reaching out to try to talk to them to see if that was their intent and to generally have a dialogue on these issues. But, even if I were to reach out, I've never suggested that they had any obligation to talk to me or agree with me. As some on this thread have suggested, they would be free to hang up, disagree with me to my face, disagree with me privately, or any other reaction that they wanted. I have offered my opinion and reaction to what they have done. You can obviously disagree with me as others have, but let's not make stuff up and say that they have an obligation to speak to me. |
You are a horrible person. Being a police officer is a helping profession and there are many good police officers so do good every day. You cannot blame a few bad seeds for all. |
It seems like current efforts to disband and defund the police are doing just that, no? |
Cool. Except, I certainly think reasonable people could read your posts that way for the following reasons: Should this change the degree to which I let me kid play with those kids, or should it change my interactions with the parents? It seems most people think I would be out of line reaching out to them to discuss it, although more recently there have been some people who seem to share my concern. Whether that would mean they think I should start a dialogue about this or not is unclear. In any event, you seem genuinely concerned about police brutality, which is great. I am sure that there is a much more productive outlet for you then DCUM and this video. Good luck. |
Sorry, but I honestly think that just asking the question about their intent and to have a "dialogue" is presumptuous. By way of analogy, I have a son who is gender non-conforming. If someone reached out to me and asked me about my "intent" in allowing him to dress and wear his hair in a gender non-conforming manner, and to have a "dialogue" with them, I would feel like they were putting me in position where I was forced to try to justify myself and coming from a place of entitlement to that explanation. In any event, you are clearly firm in the rightness of your position that the parents' action was improper, and you have explained your view. People here have told you that, for the most part, they disagree that the video was wrong. Some have agreed with you. I don't know what you are seeking here. |
The kids specified that they wanted to be police officers so they could help people? How on earth is this objectionable, PRECISELY because of the current climate? They probably just got it from Peppa Pig anyway. Good Lord.
My 4 year old's top two career goals at the moment are to be a fairy or a unicorn. I'm leaning all the way in. |