Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.

Losing the opportunity to be one of the highest judicial officials in this country is not the same as criminal charges being brought against you. Even if he were completely impeached as a judge, it wouldn’t be the same.
Anonymous
The third person and witness has a conflict — she alleges he (Judge) was not stopping the behavior.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.

Losing the opportunity to be one of the highest judicial officials in this country is not the same as criminal charges being brought against you. Even if he were completely impeached as a judge, it wouldn’t be the same.


DP. They don't care if it's the same, they just want to see their white supremacist agenda carried out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The third person and witness has a conflict — she alleges he (Judge) was not stopping the behavior.

In fact he jumped on top of Ford and Kavanaugh. Both men were giggling maniacally throughout.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If he really was sort of a rich jerk drunken teen, how the heck did he get into Yale in the 80s? Correct me if I'm wrong but he's not Bush family rich & connected, is he?


Are you being serious? Who do you think got in easily back then? Omg.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.


This is easy. If people come forward with accusations that are substantiated with evidence, then I say they should be heard. I wouldn't want a thief or an assailant on the supreme court either. Republicans are so lame. You really don't have a problem with what he did, huh?


I don’t believe that what he is alleged, not proven, to have done as a minor over 35 years ago should be dredged up now as a basis to oppose his confirmation.

But, again, if you want black and Hispanic boys routinely treated as adults for all the crimes they commit as juveniles, let’s have a go at it. Personally, I always thought there was good reason to treat juveniles differently than adults, but if you want to nail Kavanaugh because of some alleged indiscretion when he was in high school I guess I can accept the electric chair for the next 16-year-old black kid who actually murders someone.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If he really was sort of a rich jerk drunken teen, how the heck did he get into Yale in the 80s? Correct me if I'm wrong but he's not Bush family rich & connected, is he?


Are you being serious? Who do you think got in easily back then? Omg.



Pretty smart accomplished people. Clearly you weren’t there.
Anonymous
LOL to the PP who thinks white men are treated unfairly in ANY system that suddenly there needs to be a crackdown on black teenage shoplifters.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The third person and witness has a conflict — she alleges he (Judge) was not stopping the behavior.

In fact he jumped on top of Ford and Kavanaugh. Both men were giggling maniacally throughout.


To do what? Rape them both? Seriously, is that your contention that it was an attempted gang rape?


Two catholic boys? I don’t think so.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.


This is easy. If people come forward with accusations that are substantiated with evidence, then I say they should be heard. I wouldn't want a thief or an assailant on the supreme court either. Republicans are so lame. You really don't have a problem with what he did, huh?


I don’t believe that what he is alleged, not proven, to have done as a minor over 35 years ago should be dredged up now as a basis to oppose his confirmation.

But, again, if you want black and Hispanic boys routinely treated as adults for all the crimes they commit as juveniles, let’s have a go at it. Personally, I always thought there was good reason to treat juveniles differently than adults, but if you want to nail Kavanaugh because of some alleged indiscretion when he was in high school I guess I can accept the electric chair for the next 16-year-old black kid who actually murders someone.

What’s frightening is that you sincerely believe there’s ANY equivalence to not getting your dream job and getting executed by the state.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.

Losing the opportunity to be one of the highest judicial officials in this country is not the same as criminal charges being brought against you. Even if he were completely impeached as a judge, it wouldn’t be the same.


DP. They don't care if it's the same, they just want to see their white supremacist agenda carried out.


Or maybe you want to see your radical feminist or socialist agenda advanced, by whatever means at your disposal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The third person and witness has a conflict — she alleges he (Judge) was not stopping the behavior.

In fact he jumped on top of Ford and Kavanaugh. Both men were giggling maniacally throughout.


To do what? Rape them both? Seriously, is that your contention that it was an attempted gang rape?


Two catholic boys? I don’t think so.

This is sarcasm right?

Given
1) group rapes do happen like this and
2) the Catholic Church is THE LAST institution to have the moral high ground on sexual abuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I believe her.

No way he should be confirmed.

She has nothing to gain by coming forward. Nothing. Kudos to her for being brave.


Oh please. She's lying or grossly exaggerating. Dig through her life and I'm sure you'll find that she's not to be trusted.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.


+1M

I do not care about what he did as a minor.

Is there a magical age at which him attempting rape or successfully raping a woman would bother you?

52. That’s the magical age. Does Diane have another letter up her sleeve? Whaddya got?


So free pass on the rape up to age 52? Just for Republicans? Just for attempted rape? Just for rape of women? I’m wondering just how sick you are.

If you think your undying support says anything good about Kavanaugh, Trump, the GOP, and how the GOP treats women, it doesn’t. You really are the Christian taliban.

I gave Merrick Garland a pass up to age 52 also but he never had to use it. And I’d tread carefully on the how the GOP treats women BS. Most people on this thread are old enough to remember how Hillary and the Clinton Admin Tonton Macoute treated Bills accusers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.


This is easy. If people come forward with accusations that are substantiated with evidence, then I say they should be heard. I wouldn't want a thief or an assailant on the supreme court either. Republicans are so lame. You really don't have a problem with what he did, huh?


I don’t believe that what he is alleged, not proven, to have done as a minor over 35 years ago should be dredged up now as a basis to oppose his confirmation.

But, again, if you want black and Hispanic boys routinely treated as adults for all the crimes they commit as juveniles, let’s have a go at it. Personally, I always thought there was good reason to treat juveniles differently than adults, but if you want to nail Kavanaugh because of some alleged indiscretion when he was in high school I guess I can accept the electric chair for the next 16-year-old black kid who actually murders someone.

What’s frightening is that you sincerely believe there’s ANY equivalence to not getting your dream job and getting executed by the state.


Or maybe you’re just too effing stupid to realize where your hardball politics of character assassination are going to take this country.


Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: