Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And the next person nominated? Me too. And the next? Me too. And the next? Me too.

See the pattern here?

Keep destroying your credibility liberals.

Interesting that you assume every potential nominee has a history of sexual misconduct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

The other witness “can’t remember.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

Are you for real?

Mark Judge has zero credibility. Teenage alcoholic whose adult social media presence and his very own words prompt any rational person to believe he's a sex obsessed pervert. Other girls just might come forward with their own incidents with those two jerks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

You believe KellyAnne and Sarah Huckabee Sanders what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

Are we only allowed to believe women who accuse Democrats or blindly defend Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

You believe KellyAnne and Sarah Huckabee Sanders what?

I believe they are gutless sycophants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

And yet, here you are...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

+1M

I do not care about what he did as a minor.

Is there a magical age at which him attempting rape or successfully raping a woman would bother you?

52. That’s the magical age. Does Diane have another letter up her sleeve? Whaddya got?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

Are we only allowed to believe women who accuse Democrats or blindly defend Trump?

It’s 100% partisan for the GOP. And I actually doubt pp when he says he believes Paula Jones and Juanita Brodderick. I think PP, like many men in the GOP, don’t believe it’s rape if the woman did anything “wrong.” Unless it was a stranger abducting a modestly dressed, church going virgin going home from her respectable job at a decent hour, they literally believe it’s the woman’s fault and it doesn’t count unless it was violent and she did everything she could fight them off to preserve her modesty.

They can pretend otherwise, but their words betray them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

And yet, here you are...

Here I am what? Sorry, the weight of the evidence supports him. I grant her the credit hat I think she is sincere- what more can you give her in these circumstances? There are no other allegations against the guy. A hard core rapist would have a bunch of victims. What else can you do with this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

+1M

I do not care about what he did as a minor.

Is there a magical age at which him attempting rape or successfully raping a woman would bother you?

52. That’s the magical age. Does Diane have another letter up her sleeve? Whaddya got?

So free pass on the rape up to age 52? Just for Republicans? Just for attempted rape? Just for rape of women? I’m wondering just how sick you are.

If you think your undying support says anything good about Kavanaugh, Trump, the GOP, and how the GOP treats women, it doesn’t. You really are the Christian taliban.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

You clearly believe the accuser. I do not.

Of course you don’t. Women are never to be believed by GOPers.

False , I believe kellyanne and Sarah Huckabe Sanders. I believed Paula Jones and still believe Juanita Broadderick. You?

Kellyanne ans Sarah? You funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

And yet, here you are...

Here I am what? Sorry, the weight of the evidence supports him. I grant her the credit hat I think she is sincere- what more can you give her in these circumstances? There are no other allegations against the guy. A hard core rapist would have a bunch of victims. What else can you do with this?

DP. I’ll ask again since maybe I missed your post: how many victims would it take for you to actual believe her? And what “weight of evidence” supports him?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Decades old recollections of this type of issue can vary greatly.

I tend to believe she and Kavanaugh both think they are telling the truth.

The only other witness supports kavanaugh’s version.

Without being disrespectful - at least not intentionally to the alleged victim, it’s hard to do anything with this scenario other than to ignore it.

[/quote]

And yet, here you are...[/quote]

Here I am what? Sorry, the weight of the evidence supports him. I grant her the credit hat I think she is sincere- what more can you give her in these circumstances? There are no other allegations against the guy. A hard core rapist would have a bunch of victims. What else can you do with this?[/quote]
DP. I’ll ask again since maybe I missed your post: how many victims would it take for you to actual believe her? And what “weight of evidence” supports him?[/quote]

The weight of evidence is the denial of the alleged witness- Charles judge.

If there were one or two other women making similar allegations, I would take it very seriously.

It’s not that I don’t take this woman seriously- just the weight of evidence clearly favors him.