Forum Index
»
Elementary School-Aged Kids
Exactly my point. I posted my schedule to show how my day looked. I'm actually busy doing stuff during the day when I'm home. But I enjoy the most crucial part of being home full time -- taking care of everyone's needs and making sure things run smoothly. I find pleasure in this. Other people don't (and I don't knock it because putting everyone first can feel horrible to someone who doesn't feel fulfilled or appreciated, etc.). But I don't think my choice to make sure my children and marriage and home are my full time endeavor matters to anyone but my husband and children. I don't even volunteer. So, I'm not going to pretend that is keeping me busy. I don't think there's any shame in being a homemaker if you love it. And there's no shame in working full time if you need to or want to do it. |
| I am curious, and I know this is a DC based site, but do all the SAHM's that are commenting live within 30 miles of the Beltway and if so, how long have you lived here? The cost of living makes a huge difference, and if you bought at the right time in this area, your mortgage is probably under $1,500. |
I am the first poster quoted. I think this is why the SAHMs I know are pretty freaking rich. Their husbands seem to enjoy their work and make so much excess that it doesn't make sense for their wives to work if they don't want to. I wouldn't work if my husband made 600k plus either. We make 200k combined so that is unimaginable for us anyway. |
Sounds nice to me! |
Lived here 20 years. Bethesda. |
2 miles from DC $4k mortgage 20 years |
I live in Calif, cost of living is similar. |
I agree with most of what you say until your last two sentences. Of course, taking care of own's children is worthy in and of itself. However, counting on one spouse's income is a risky proposition in the long run, and that's something rarely acknowledged by SAHMs in these threads. What we hear from the SAHMs is how it's a joint decision, husband supports it, and how valuable it is for them to have a relaxed life of volunteering and cleaning the house (especially once the kids are in school), but no acceptance that this may be the situation now, but won't necessarily be the situation in the future. Spouses die, become disabled, and leave. Given the divorce rate in this country, spouse leaving is a very real possibility sometime in the marriage. What then? Threads about SAHMs who have to reenter the workforce and surprised that they either can't find a high paying job without current skills. So basically, this is why I respect daycare providers, nannies, and housecleaners more than I respect SAHMs who stay at home once their kids are in school all day and they describe their days as hours of the day at the gym, perfecting hobbies, or keeping a spotless home. What does that have to do with me personally? Not much, which is why I don't say anything to the SAHMs I know. But to come here and suggest that WOHMs don't think taking care of their own children as being worthy is insulting to those of us who work hard because we plan carefully and believe that it is the responsibility of every adult to be able to provide for themselves and their families. Of course, if you're independently wealthy or have a rock solid prenup that provides for the rest of your life, this doesn't apply to you. However, that is not the situation for most women, even the SAHMs on DCUM. I don't have an issue with people who choose to SAH while their children are small, or who work P/T, or even those who network or structure their volunteering to dovetail into a future job, should they need one. But most of SAHMs on these threads don't stress that. They stress how relaxed they are, how personally fulfilled they are, and how sad they are for WOHMs because they don't value taking care of their families. That's the sad truth and part of the reason the mommy wars get so heated here. |
We've lived in the area for over 20 yrs. About 7 miles from the Beltway. |
This is much more eloquent than I could put it so I've just bolded what I agree with. Excellent post. |
Wait, so no SAHMs are on here saying WOHMs don't value their children, etc? You shouldn't care that I work, and I don't really care if you don't, but that's not apples to apples. Women who choose to voluntarily leave the workforce make it difficult for other women to be taken seriously as professionals, for adequate maternity leave and parental support in the workplace to become a reality, and for feminism as a whole to progress. |
Seriously? How many SAHMs on this board would take care of other people's children or clean other people's houses for any amount of money? Please. You know damn well they would find that demeaning, because those jobs are mostly done by women who don't have other options. |
We live in downtown DC. Don't have a mortgage. Paid off and we bought in 2010. DC property taxes are relatively cheap especially with the homestead deduction. |
I live in Reston. Our mortgage is $3k. DH makes about $260k. But he made $160k when our first was born and I stopped working. Back then we lived in a townhouse and our mortgage was 1800. |
But that is a choice, PP. I think you're right. It is risky to be a housewife. I know, because I am one (having posted my schedule). I also know that if my husband dropped dead, I would be devastated but would survive because of life insurance and my prior professional background (I worked in a high demand area and can re-up my certs fairly easily). That said, I think everyone values their families. Everyone is doing their best. But for me, my choice is to be home and serve my husband and children and be a homemaker. I don't think that is the best choice for anyone and I didn't even necessarily knew if it would have worked for me (as someone who didn't hate working, but just decided to try being home for a year). I am relaxed, though. And fulfilled. I'm not sad for anyone except someone who is struggling in a spot they don't want to be in. |