Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

[Anonymous]

US Representative Steve Scalise, The Family Research Council, Turning Point USA - all groups or individuals that the SPLC had added to its “racist organizations” list, which were all subsequently attacked within months of being added to the list by violent leftists.

In the case of Charlie Kirk - he was assassinated by a progressive identifying sniper just 12 weeks after being declared “a racist” by the SPLC.


Sounds like the SPLC was providing targeting data for violent liberals to act on.


I suspect this indictment is part of a larger strategy to get various individuals within the organization to flip and turn informants to avoid jail time for crimes associated with the funding of domestic terrorists, in exchange for further testimony revealing the group’s actual goals of identifying political enemies and encouraging violent extremists to target them.

That’s the real reason for the indictments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:US Representative Steve Scalise, The Family Research Council, Turning Point USA - all groups or individuals that the SPLC had added to its “racist organizations” list, which were all subsequently attacked within months of being added to the list by violent leftists.

In the case of Charlie Kirk - he was assassinated by a progressive identifying sniper just 12 weeks after being declared “a racist” by the SPLC.


Sounds like the SPLC was providing targeting data for violent liberals to act on.


I suspect this indictment is part of a larger strategy to get various individuals within the organization to flip and turn informants to avoid jail time for crimes associated with the funding of domestic terrorists, in exchange for further testimony revealing the group’s actual goals of identifying political enemies and encouraging violent extremists to target them.

That’s the real reason for the indictments.

Who attacked the Family Research Council?

[Anonymous]

I am reading through the indictment. SPLC wasn’t “paying informants,” they were paying their people to be presidents and leaders of major hate orgs.

This hinges on whether people who donated would be ok with their donations being used for that purpose, whether SPLC hid it from donors, and how the non-profit used their donor money.

The government has to prove the case, but I personally think don’t think paying a person to be the president of a hate org is fighting hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:






I am reading through the indictment. SPLC wasn’t “paying informants,” they were paying their people to be presidents and leaders of major hate orgs.

This hinges on whether people who donated would be ok with their donations being used for that purpose, whether SPLC hid it from donors, and how the non-profit used their donor money.

The government has to prove the case, but I personally think don’t think paying a person to be the president of a hate org is fighting hate.

That portion of the indictment leaves out a pretty critical word in SPLC’s description of the Klan group. Why?

[Anonymous]

https://www.hatecomestomainstreet.com/p/the-splc-indictment-separating-fact

Lots of People Are Lying About the SPLC Indictment: Here's the Evidence

It's almost as if the people most excited by the indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center have not read the indictment--or they really don't care.

[Anonymous]

Read the SPLC federal indictment (PDF)

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28065541-splc-indictment-april-21-2026/

It’s only 14 pages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:






I am reading through the indictment. SPLC wasn’t “paying informants,” they were paying their people to be presidents and leaders of major hate orgs.

This hinges on whether people who donated would be ok with their donations being used for that purpose, whether SPLC hid it from donors, and how the non-profit used their donor money.

The government has to prove the case, but I personally think don’t think paying a person to be the president of a hate org is fighting hate.

That portion of the indictment leaves out a pretty critical word in SPLC’s description of the Klan group. Why?

If hate was really that bad, why didn’t they pay a guy to be the president?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:






I am reading through the indictment. SPLC wasn’t “paying informants,” they were paying their people to be presidents and leaders of major hate orgs.

This hinges on whether people who donated would be ok with their donations being used for that purpose, whether SPLC hid it from donors, and how the non-profit used their donor money.

The government has to prove the case, but I personally think don’t think paying a person to be the president of a hate org is fighting hate.

That portion of the indictment leaves out a pretty critical word in SPLC’s description of the Klan group. Why?

If hate was really that bad, why didn’t they pay a guy to be the president?

Sorry, mistyped.

Why did they have to pay a guy to be the president?

Did their donors know what they were doing with the money?

Did they abide by non-profit rules for their payment of informants and financial disclosure in banking?

And the gov has to prove all this. They have to have evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

[Anonymous]

SPLC lost credibility when they let Dees retire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

Is this the same poster posting again and again on this thread? Posting lies, lies and more lies.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is an organization that fights hate and racism. It's a respected organization that has, in the past, paid informants to infiltrate right-wing hate groups and report information about the groups' activities.

There is NO EVIDENCE, none, whatsoever, that the SPLC funded hate groups or encouraged hate group activity. It paid people to spy on the hate groups and report back to SPLC. SPLC also helped the FBI inform on these groups. Now, Kash Patel is using the old FBI files on the SPLC to indict the organization for its activities that the FBI encouraged, supported and benefited from.

Stop posting all the lies about SPLC, PP. It's annoying and stupid, and NO ONE ON THIS BOARD BELIEVES YOU.

There is substantial evidence SPLC gave people in these groups. The indictment makes a good case for wire fraud.

You dissemble talking about its so-called support of the FBI and making irrelevant points that the money didn't go directly to the groups. SPLC looks to have committed a string of crimes, and the rule of law crowd here is unsurprisingly quiet because they don't think the law should apply to Democrats.

The SPLC is an anti-white group, and I hope its leadership goes to jail.

You've revealed yourself. This is what it's really about. Not wire fraud, tax fraud, etc. All that stuff is just dressing to cover up the real reason: You just don't like them because you feel threatened by anti-white-supremacy.

I think they are anti-white and that the rule of law should apply to them. You lie about my beliefs, which you don't know, and seem to approve of SPLC evading the rule of law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

[Anonymous]

I’m a (now former) donor and I am very unhappy about the paying of informants. That’s not why I donated money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:US Representative Steve Scalise, The Family Research Council, Turning Point USA - all groups or individuals that the SPLC had added to its “racist organizations” list, which were all subsequently attacked within months of being added to the list by violent leftists.

In the case of Charlie Kirk - he was assassinated by a progressive identifying sniper just 12 weeks after being declared “a racist” by the SPLC.


Sounds like the SPLC was providing targeting data for violent liberals to act on.


I suspect this indictment is part of a larger strategy to get various individuals within the organization to flip and turn informants to avoid jail time for crimes associated with the funding of domestic terrorists, in exchange for further testimony revealing the group’s actual goals of identifying political enemies and encouraging violent extremists to target them.

That’s the real reason for the indictments.

It's something to do with povvitty.
This radical left group, the Southern Povvitty Policy Research Council,
They were doing some terrible things.
They're radical left.

They're the radical left,
And they're a disgrace. A complete disgrace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).