MoCo Council Vote Today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Fani Gonzalez, Friedson, and Glass need to be voted out. They masquerade as being for the little people and then sell out neighborhoods underneath them.

True Story: on July 16 I attended Fani Gonzalez’s “listening session” on the University Boulevard Corridor Plan in Kemp Mill. Many of the attendees - probably 80% - were from the orthodox Jewish Kemp Mill community. Others there were from communities affected by the ZTA bill and/or other neighborhoods impacted by these plans. The neighborhoods represented - people usually started comments with where they live so it was easy to track - are all working class and middle class communities and very diverse. Kemp Mill, while it had a large orthodox community, is also very diverse.

There were hundreds of people in attendance. People lined up for hours - literally - to share concerns. There was not a single person who wanted more density, or rezoning, or BRT centers smacked right in the middle of already congested roads. Not one person. Fani Gonzalez pretended to care. She even started out the session by bringing her “friend” Council Member Katz from Gaithersburg on stage to basically tell the crowd that Fani Gonzalez is a good person - I guess she need to trot out a Jew to tell Jews she’s ok because they can’t think for themselves. /s

Anyway, after listening to hours of concerns, including people who will lose land because of the ZTA, Fani Gonzalez voted FOR the bill less than a week later. In other words, this was all performative BS.

And interestingly, Council Member Katz did not vote for the bill …. So why did she enlist him on July 16? The tokenism is just gross. It’s also misleading. She likely knew he had no intention of voting for the bill and so did he. Shame on both of them.

This bill is a nightmare and will hurt the very communities that Fani Gonzalez and these sell outs like Glass, Friedson, abs Stewart are pushing. It’s time to vote them out. Remember this next year at the polls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Fani Gonzalez, Friedson, and Glass need to be voted out. They masquerade as being for the little people and then sell out neighborhoods underneath them.

True Story: on July 16 I attended Fani Gonzalez’s “listening session” on the University Boulevard Corridor Plan in Kemp Mill. Many of the attendees - probably 80% - were from the orthodox Jewish Kemp Mill community. Others there were from communities affected by the ZTA bill and/or other neighborhoods impacted by these plans. The neighborhoods represented - people usually started comments with where they live so it was easy to track - are all working class and middle class communities and very diverse. Kemp Mill, while it had a large orthodox community, is also very diverse.

There were hundreds of people in attendance. People lined up for hours - literally - to share concerns. There was not a single person who wanted more density, or rezoning, or BRT centers smacked right in the middle of already congested roads. Not one person. Fani Gonzalez pretended to care. She even started out the session by bringing her “friend” Council Member Katz from Gaithersburg on stage to basically tell the crowd that Fani Gonzalez is a good person - I guess she need to trot out a Jew to tell Jews she’s ok because they can’t think for themselves. /s

Anyway, after listening to hours of concerns, including people who will lose land because of the ZTA, Fani Gonzalez voted FOR the bill less than a week later. In other words, this was all performative BS.

And interestingly, Council Member Katz did not vote for the bill …. So why did she enlist him on July 16? The tokenism is just gross. It’s also misleading. She likely knew he had no intention of voting for the bill and so did he. Shame on both of them.

This bill is a nightmare and will hurt the very communities that Fani Gonzalez and these sell outs like Glass, Friedson, abs Stewart are pushing. It’s time to vote them out. Remember this next year at the polls.

It's amazing that some people still think they should have the right to choose who their neighbors can be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Fani Gonzalez, Friedson, and Glass need to be voted out. They masquerade as being for the little people and then sell out neighborhoods underneath them.

True Story: on July 16 I attended Fani Gonzalez’s “listening session” on the University Boulevard Corridor Plan in Kemp Mill. Many of the attendees - probably 80% - were from the orthodox Jewish Kemp Mill community. Others there were from communities affected by the ZTA bill and/or other neighborhoods impacted by these plans. The neighborhoods represented - people usually started comments with where they live so it was easy to track - are all working class and middle class communities and very diverse. Kemp Mill, while it had a large orthodox community, is also very diverse.

There were hundreds of people in attendance. People lined up for hours - literally - to share concerns. There was not a single person who wanted more density, or rezoning, or BRT centers smacked right in the middle of already congested roads. Not one person. Fani Gonzalez pretended to care. She even started out the session by bringing her “friend” Council Member Katz from Gaithersburg on stage to basically tell the crowd that Fani Gonzalez is a good person - I guess she need to trot out a Jew to tell Jews she’s ok because they can’t think for themselves. /s

Anyway, after listening to hours of concerns, including people who will lose land because of the ZTA, Fani Gonzalez voted FOR the bill less than a week later. In other words, this was all performative BS.

And interestingly, Council Member Katz did not vote for the bill …. So why did she enlist him on July 16? The tokenism is just gross. It’s also misleading. She likely knew he had no intention of voting for the bill and so did he. Shame on both of them.

This bill is a nightmare and will hurt the very communities that Fani Gonzalez and these sell outs like Glass, Friedson, abs Stewart are pushing. It’s time to vote them out. Remember this next year at the polls.

It's amazing that some people still think they should have the right to choose who their neighbors can be.

It’s amazing that that is your delusional takeaway. BTW, there are already high-rises in Kemp Mill, hence the concern about additional density. You’d know that if you actually loved around here and weren’t another GGW shill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Price controls don't work. The have modest short-term benefits while creating disasterous long-term problems. We need more housing close to jobs and transit. You won't get that it you discourage investment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Fani Gonzalez, Friedson, and Glass need to be voted out. They masquerade as being for the little people and then sell out neighborhoods underneath them.

True Story: on July 16 I attended Fani Gonzalez’s “listening session” on the University Boulevard Corridor Plan in Kemp Mill. Many of the attendees - probably 80% - were from the orthodox Jewish Kemp Mill community. Others there were from communities affected by the ZTA bill and/or other neighborhoods impacted by these plans. The neighborhoods represented - people usually started comments with where they live so it was easy to track - are all working class and middle class communities and very diverse. Kemp Mill, while it had a large orthodox community, is also very diverse.

There were hundreds of people in attendance. People lined up for hours - literally - to share concerns. There was not a single person who wanted more density, or rezoning, or BRT centers smacked right in the middle of already congested roads. Not one person. Fani Gonzalez pretended to care. She even started out the session by bringing her “friend” Council Member Katz from Gaithersburg on stage to basically tell the crowd that Fani Gonzalez is a good person - I guess she need to trot out a Jew to tell Jews she’s ok because they can’t think for themselves. /s

Anyway, after listening to hours of concerns, including people who will lose land because of the ZTA, Fani Gonzalez voted FOR the bill less than a week later. In other words, this was all performative BS.

And interestingly, Council Member Katz did not vote for the bill …. So why did she enlist him on July 16? The tokenism is just gross. It’s also misleading. She likely knew he had no intention of voting for the bill and so did he. Shame on both of them.

This bill is a nightmare and will hurt the very communities that Fani Gonzalez and these sell outs like Glass, Friedson, abs Stewart are pushing. It’s time to vote them out. Remember this next year at the polls.

It's amazing that some people still think they should have the right to choose who their neighbors can be.

It’s amazing that that is your delusional takeaway. BTW, there are already high-rises in Kemp Mill, hence the concern about additional density. You’d know that if you actually loved around here and weren’t another GGW shill.

Of course that's what's going on. It's not always motivated by racial or socioeconomic segregation, but ultimately comes back to people thinking they should get to control others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can’t we build on green space up i270? I’m sure land would be cheaper.

And then add more people who ahve to drive everywhere on roads that are already overcongested. hence focusing housing in transit corridors, you know, the way the rest of the world does it.

So you oppose SFH up 270. How does that make you different from people who oppose small apartment buildings in Chevy Chase? You both want to ban some housing because you don’t like it.

You don't get out much. Development up 270 continues. But it isn't good for anyone to have sprawl be the only path to additional housing.

It’s not the only path to additional housing and I think you know this. More housing has been built down county than upcounty in recent years. But it’s mostly rentals. The biggest mismatch in supply and demand is actually homes available for purchase. That mismatch has driven prices up in all market segments because it’s forced people to rent longer than they have in the past.

The population will continue to grow. We can create more housing, but we can't create more space. Not at ground level, at least. Higher density development in desirable areas benefits more people-- both to the increased number of people that can live in those areas and to others, through the reducing infrastructure and environmental impacts of sprawl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Price controls don't work. The have modest short-term benefits while creating disasterous long-term problems. We need more housing close to jobs and transit. You won't get that it you discourage investment.

To be clear, this means walking away from inclusionary zoning. Your prescription will worsen economic segregation in this county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Fani Gonzalez, Friedson, and Glass need to be voted out. They masquerade as being for the little people and then sell out neighborhoods underneath them.

True Story: on July 16 I attended Fani Gonzalez’s “listening session” on the University Boulevard Corridor Plan in Kemp Mill. Many of the attendees - probably 80% - were from the orthodox Jewish Kemp Mill community. Others there were from communities affected by the ZTA bill and/or other neighborhoods impacted by these plans. The neighborhoods represented - people usually started comments with where they live so it was easy to track - are all working class and middle class communities and very diverse. Kemp Mill, while it had a large orthodox community, is also very diverse.

There were hundreds of people in attendance. People lined up for hours - literally - to share concerns. There was not a single person who wanted more density, or rezoning, or BRT centers smacked right in the middle of already congested roads. Not one person. Fani Gonzalez pretended to care. She even started out the session by bringing her “friend” Council Member Katz from Gaithersburg on stage to basically tell the crowd that Fani Gonzalez is a good person - I guess she need to trot out a Jew to tell Jews she’s ok because they can’t think for themselves. /s

Anyway, after listening to hours of concerns, including people who will lose land because of the ZTA, Fani Gonzalez voted FOR the bill less than a week later. In other words, this was all performative BS.

And interestingly, Council Member Katz did not vote for the bill …. So why did she enlist him on July 16? The tokenism is just gross. It’s also misleading. She likely knew he had no intention of voting for the bill and so did he. Shame on both of them.

This bill is a nightmare and will hurt the very communities that Fani Gonzalez and these sell outs like Glass, Friedson, abs Stewart are pushing. It’s time to vote them out. Remember this next year at the polls.

It's amazing that some people still think they should have the right to choose who their neighbors can be.

It’s amazing that that is your delusional takeaway. BTW, there are already high-rises in Kemp Mill, hence the concern about additional density. You’d know that if you actually loved around here and weren’t another GGW shill.

The other thread said the quiet part out loud:

* The question shouldn’t be “why aren’t there more homes in this nice place?” The question we should be asking is “why aren’t there more nice people in other places?”

* Stop asking “hOw bUiLd mOrE hOuSe?!?!,” and start asking “how do we achieve cheaper forms of behavioral segregation than pricing?”
The biggest question is, “how do we reduce bad behaviors and increase good ones?”

* The “housing shortage” is a euphemism for the rapid decline of social capital, including divorce, drug use, mental illness, “homelessness” (which is just mental illness), obesity, anti-social hostility, irreligiousness, single-motherhood, low-IQ dysgenics, and low social trust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can’t we build on green space up i270? I’m sure land would be cheaper.

And then add more people who ahve to drive everywhere on roads that are already overcongested. hence focusing housing in transit corridors, you know, the way the rest of the world does it.

So you oppose SFH up 270. How does that make you different from people who oppose small apartment buildings in Chevy Chase? You both want to ban some housing because you don’t like it.

You don't get out much. Development up 270 continues. But it isn't good for anyone to have sprawl be the only path to additional housing.

It’s not the only path to additional housing and I think you know this. More housing has been built down county than upcounty in recent years. But it’s mostly rentals. The biggest mismatch in supply and demand is actually homes available for purchase. That mismatch has driven prices up in all market segments because it’s forced people to rent longer than they have in the past.

The population will continue to grow. We can create more housing, but we can't create more space. Not at ground level, at least. Higher density development in desirable areas benefits more people-- both to the increased number of people that can live in those areas and to others, through the reducing infrastructure and environmental impacts of sprawl.

You’re dodging. What is your solution to increasing home ownership? A large majority of renters would rather own and that’s what they want government to fix. I don’t care if it’s horizontal or vertical. You prefer vertical. How do you incentivize developers to deliver more condos? Right now they would rather be landlords and keep as many people renting as possible.

[Anonymous]

Birth Control and Border Control, not Rent Control

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Price controls don't work. The have modest short-term benefits while creating disasterous long-term problems. We need more housing close to jobs and transit. You won't get that it you discourage investment.

To be clear, this means walking away from inclusionary zoning. Your prescription will worsen economic segregation in this county.

Mandating or encouraging below-market-rate housing development as a bandaid for segregated communities can be reasonable, but that addresses the social impact of entirely segregated communities, rather than addressing the affordable housing problem. And would need to be implemented with other incentives to offset the disincentives it creates to build housing.

But that doesn't require every project to include below-market-rate homes. That isn't practical for smaller-scale projects, nor is it necessary for the goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

This "evil greedy developer" schtick really is getting old. There is 0 evidence to support that claim.

Hint: a greedy evil developer built the house you are living in. An evil greedy corporation built the computer you are using right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next bill in this package is an SRA that Andrew Friedson introduced Tuesday. As proposed, the SRA would allow developers to combine three lots and still build under the ZTA. In effect, the SRA moves the ZTA from duplexes and small apartment buildings to apartment buildings that can stretch half a block or more, with ground floor retail in some locations and effectively no affordable housing requirements.

This is a selling point for some. Many delusional neighbors seem to think we will get artisanal cheese shops and local coffee roasters, rather than Jersey's Mike's and mattress stores. Ah, nothing like a nice Sunday morning walk to test out a new Tempur-Pedic.

Retail is a selling point for me in some locations. For the lots that are on service roads, I don’t think it makes sense. They should have excluded the lots on service roads from the ZTA because they’re not actually on the corridor itself but they decided not to.

You might not get a coffee shop or bakery, it will probably be a night club, bar, or marijuana dispensary. People are too easy to fool with distracting and dishonest campaign tactics. The end goal of the YIMBYs is to eliminate zoning entirely and allow everything anywhere. If we let them win your neighbor will be able to turn their house into a 24 strip club+bar and there will be nothing you can do to protect yourself. These zoning reforms mainly benefit the ultra wealthy who have significant investments in real estate development firms at the expense of middle class and upper middle class homeowners. The middle class people will suffer the consequences when their schools are overcrowded, noise pollution is harming their sleep quality, and secondhand smoke is worsening their kids asthma. The ultra wealthy developers lobbying for these reforms are largely unaffected because they live in exclusive neighborhoods that have rules to protect their family from their own policies and they (usually) send their kids to private school.

So you're saying MoCo is going to circumvent state law and allow 24-hour liquor licenses now?

I never said that. My point is MOCO is very limited in its ability to protect residents and the state is coming up with new ways to limit localities capacity to protect residents every year. I have lived next to a bar that operates late into the night before and it’s not pleasant. When you need to wake up at 5am or 6am to get to your job having a bar or restaurant that closes at 1am to 2am is a significant nuisance. Enforcement of county noise ordinances is atrocious in MOCO and residential building codes (in the US) are woefully insufficient to mitigate to impact of noise pollution.

The whole YIMBY argument that people should “just move” if they don’t agree with proposed zoning changes is ridiculous. There is nowhere for these people that need quiet neighborhoods for (personal or health reasons) to move to if people can put a bar almost anywhere in the county.

The NIMBY argument: Just be homeless!

Not only is that absurd, but literally nothing about any of the recent plans addresses affordable housing. Real, true affordable housing. This is just the County Council giving it all away to developers and it hurts the middle class and working class SFH neighborhoods that are largely the focus of this - they’re not pulling this sh!t in Bethesda and Potomac.

The More Housing NOW tax abatement only applies to rentals. The ZTA has no requirement to make anything available for purchase and landlords may charge more $3,000 a month for an apartment and still call it workforce housing under the law. There’s nothing here that’s going to help anyone buy anything and there’s nothing in here that’s going to help the workforce.

Price controls don't work. The have modest short-term benefits while creating disasterous long-term problems. We need more housing close to jobs and transit. You won't get that it you discourage investment.

To be clear, this means walking away from inclusionary zoning. Your prescription will worsen economic segregation in this county.

Inclusionary zoning is a tax on the middle class. Will you volunteer 10% of your rent to low-income people living in the apartment next to you?

Didn't think so. Don't make us pay for your social engineering experiements.