Well not even the government thought he was a criminal when they sent him away. They came up with this after the fact to cover themselves. |
well, the fact that they are inventing a story about human trafficking out of a day laborer driving day laborers to a construction job... I'd say it's a pretty good bet. But I am not just talking about Abrego Garcia. I am talking about the majority of the people in CECOT who are not criminals either. And the majority of the women, high school students, garment district workers, etc being arrested on a daily basis by masked ICE agents. |
|
The outrage was about due process.
The constitution requires due process for everyone. The point is that we do not know whether anyone is guilty not until AFTER they have due process. All of you claiming those that stood up for due process will regret it because it turns out Garcia was a criminal need to understand that even a rapist and murderer is entitled to due process because we will never know if they are, in fact, a rapist and murdered without it. Without it your innocent grandmother could be accused or rape and murder and sent to the gulag until the end of her days without trial because the government says she is bad. Everyone will say "how can you defend her, she is a rapist and murderer". That is not a world I want to live in. |
They've trumped up a clearly unproveable human trafficking charge in order to buy time to legally deport him. Added bonus, no one is talking about CECOT anymore. |
There is video. The trooper could also testify. Maybe it is not provable, but it looks pretty much like evidence to me. But, I'm not lawyer. |
No, for expedited removal, they don't go infront of a judge. It's a faster process than a deportation hearing. Here's an immigration advocacy group describing the process. Typically in the past it was used at the border, now they're changing how its used. https://www.nilc.org/resources/know-your-rights-expedited-removal-expansion/ Do illegals at the border have due process if you're defining it as going in front of a judge? It would appear that no, not everyone has due process if you're going by that definition. |
A "day laborer" simply driving his buddy "day laborers" from Texas to NY or wherever for their day jobs. LOL Are you truly this gullible?
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/facing-charges-in-tennessee-kilmar-abrego-garcia-described-as-violent-man-with-no-control-of-his-temper |
Sounds to me like they have a good deal of hard evidence - cell phones, license plate readers, and probably a bunch more. Doesn't sound at all unprovable to me. Face it Dems, you have been rooting for a loser and a criminal. |
Individuals placed in expedited removal generally have no right to challenge their deportation in federal court, thanks to jurisdiction-stripping provisions in the 1996 law which created the process. This means that even where an immigration officer acted unlawfully in issuing an order of expedited removal, a noncitizen is severely restricted in their ability to challenge that decision. Individuals may only bring a lawsuit challenging their expedited removal order if they are a lawful permanent resident, or someone already determined to be a refugee or granted asylum, who has been wrongfully subject to expedited removal. In 2020, the Supreme Court upheld this law, finding that it did not violate the right to habeas corpus or due process. |
This was never about due process. He had a valid deportation order and still does. This was an administrative error in that he was sent to his native country despite a hold. Now he is going to stand trial. Either way, he is out of the country at some point. |
That's fine. We're fighting for your due process rights too. |
Yes, this. Also, there is a huge difference between deporting someone, and deporting someone (not even yet convicted of crime) to a gulag. |
Intelligent people know this was never about "due process." Democrats only cared about protesting Trump. If Democrats cared about due process, they'd not have let 20 million illegal aliens walk across the border like it was no big deal. Every illegal crossing is *breaking the law*. It was making a mockery of the concept of due process in the first place. The fascinating thing is that this whole episode is opening up many more questions about the Biden administration and their weird failure to do anything about the border situation because we know the man was stopped in Tennessee by the police, who called in the FBI and then was told to let him go. Why? What did the FBI know? And he went on to commit more trafficking crimes involving smuggling humans throughout the US. Amazing, isn't it? And this man is charged with severe, significantly severe, criminal gang activity involving murder and human trafficking and sexual abuse of women and possibly even minors. And you are worried about him going to a gulag? By which you mean prison in El Salvador, his home country and the only country he is citizen of? |
From Alt NPS:
“In an act of integrity and resistance, a supervisor in the Nashville federal prosecutor’s office resigned over how the Abrego Garcia case was being handled. The charges are bogus, pure political theater meant to justify a wrongful abduction. His resignation deserves respect. Some things aren’t worth selling your soul for.” |