If you are voting for Trump based on immigration- why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 2016 immigration/borders was the mainstay of his platform. He promised to build a wall and that Mexico was going to pay for it. We all know that didn't happen. Again, in 2024, this is the mainstay of his platform. What do you think he is going to do differently this time?

Democrats shut down the government rather than protect our country with border barriers.

He did a good job last time with safe third country agreements, Migrant Protection Protocol and expulsion orders. All he needs to do is reinstate those policies and cancel Biden’s CBP One app and disastrous CHNV parole program and we will be in a lot better shape as a country.

The last shutdown began in 2018 with Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate. Trump himself took credit for the shutdown: "I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down." That is not Democrats shutting down the government.

Because Democrats refused to fund the wall.

With good reason. The wall can be scaled with a $20 ladder or breached with a $100 saw. Building the wall is a waste of resources.

Democrats don't oppose a wall because it won't work. They oppose a wall because it will work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

The Biden administration has deported more than a million people. That's not open borders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

It’s working for Democrats because all they see is more Democrat voters. They don’t care about anyth7ngbbut political power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

It’s working for Democrats because all they see is more Democrat voters. They don’t care about anyth7ngbbut political power.

Oh, so you're going to tell me Republicans are any different? They had four years of Trump's presidency to solve the border crisis, including the first two with control of both houses of Congress. But they'd much rather make their base live in constant fear of migrant caravans so they can keep having that issue to run on. Political parties care about political power. It's pretty shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 2016 immigration/borders was the mainstay of his platform. He promised to build a wall and that Mexico was going to pay for it. We all know that didn't happen. Again, in 2024, this is the mainstay of his platform. What do you think he is going to do differently this time?

Democrats shut down the government rather than protect our country with border barriers.

He did a good job last time with safe third country agreements, Migrant Protection Protocol and expulsion orders. All he needs to do is reinstate those policies and cancel Biden’s CBP One app and disastrous CHNV parole program and we will be in a lot better shape as a country.

The last shutdown began in 2018 with Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate. Trump himself took credit for the shutdown: "I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down." That is not Democrats shutting down the government.

Because Democrats refused to fund the wall.

With good reason. The wall can be scaled with a $20 ladder or breached with a $100 saw. Building the wall is a waste of resources.

Democrats don't oppose a wall because it won't work. They oppose a wall because it will work.

I always appreciate people who say a wall will work. It makes it really easy to tell who has never read anything serious about illegal immigration in the United States. Or walls.

[Anonymous]

There is a way to stop illegal immigration. Just make a law that says anyone crossing the border illegally is ineligible for citizenship. Why? Because if you don't respect U.S. law, you can't become one of it's citizens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

The Biden administration has deported more than a million people. That's not open borders.

They boast these high numbers of deportations by reclassify and including in this count removals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

It’s working for Democrats because all they see is more Democrat voters. They don’t care about anyth7ngbbut political power.

Oh, so you're going to tell me Republicans are any different? They had four years of Trump's presidency to solve the border crisis, including the first two with control of both houses of Congress. But they'd much rather make their base live in constant fear of migrant caravans so they can keep having that issue to run on. Political parties care about political power. It's pretty shocking.

Trump Said he wanted to close the border.
Republican voter want to close border.
Republican donor want open border because they like cheap labor.

Donor win, votor loose.

Money talkig big.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

It’s working for Democrats because all they see is more Democrat voters. They don’t care about anyth7ngbbut political power.

Oh, so you're going to tell me Republicans are any different? They had four years of Trump's presidency to solve the border crisis, including the first two with control of both houses of Congress. But they'd much rather make their base live in constant fear of migrant caravans so they can keep having that issue to run on. Political parties care about political power. It's pretty shocking.

Democrats are the ones who refuse to vote on bills for a secure border. They are the reason behind the crisis.

The OP is delusional. Biden-Harris have allowed more illegal immigrants to enter than the last several administrations combined. All I have to do is look at Trump’s executive orders on immigration and the numbers while he was in office and compare them to Biden-Harris to see that Trump is the far superior candidate.

[Anonymous]

What are open borders?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As usual, the globalists at DCUM completely ignored HR2

H.R. 2 includes a laundry list of essential immigration reforms long fought for by immigration experts;

* Plugging loopholes in the asylum system that are currently being exploited by economic migrants by raising the bar for “credible fear” claims and denying entry to aliens claiming asylum at the border who have passed through a safe third country on their way to the United States and failed to apply in that safe country;
* Blocking the administration from continuing its catch-and-release policy by making most illegal aliens ineligible for parole or release from custody other than to be returned to their home country or to a contiguous country to await the adjudication of their asylum claim there (Remain in Mexico);.
* Preventing family units who cross the border illegally from being released into the United States by requiring family units apprehended at the border to be detained, protecting them from exploitation and victimization by the cartels and traffickers;
* Reining in the breathtaking and illegal abuse of parole that this administration has been using to create its own immigration system outside of the confines of the Immigration and Nationality Act; and
* Installing teeth into efforts to deter visa overstays.

Perhaps most importantly, the bill would require employers to check the legal status of new hires through the free, easy-to-use E-Verify system. By making it much harder for illegal aliens to find jobs, the reform would deter would-be migrants from ever journeying to the United States.

and yet Democrats have shown they are not serious about controlling immigration, and it seems that increasing immigration is a policy choice by Democrats.

Nobody ignored H.R. 2. We know it's there. We also know it's a messaging bill whose authors understood completely that it was dead on arrival in the Senate.

House Democrats passed the For The People Act in 2019 but McConnell didn't bring it up for a vote. They tried again in 2021 and while Schumer did bring it up, it didn't survive the filibuster. The fact that the bill failed to become law came as a surprise to no one - this was a messaging bill too. Both sides pass them to let the people know where they stand. And if enough voters agree with H.R. 2 they'll elect 60 Republican senators and a Republican president. But we're not there yet.

And the Senate’s weak border bill was also a messaging bill that was not intended to pass. It was all of Biden and Democrats policies. It did not secure the border, but it was intended to fool voters into thinking Democrats were doing something to secure the border. It was to deflect blame for the border crisis onto Trump and Republicans. Its authors knew it would never pass the House.

Its principal author was conservative Republican Sen. James Lankford. Why would he want to do that?

No, the principal author was the Biden admin, Chris Murphy, and Kirsten Sinema, all Democrats. James Lankford got anything for Republicans in the bill. The bill was so bad it had no chance of passing the House. He spoke on the Senate floor about all the good policies Democrats rejected

https://youtu.be/0Lpq_SbvCgo?si=clDENHJWsb2NW5rw

He's describing the process of negotiation between the two sides, something that's necessary for any bill to become a law under divided government. The House bill was crafted without bipartisan negotiation, which is why it never had a chance.

The Democrats side is open borders.

Yeah and this isn't working for anyone anymore. Not schools not housing nothing.

It’s working for Democrats because all they see is more Democrat voters. They don’t care about anyth7ngbbut political power.

Oh, so you're going to tell me Republicans are any different? They had four years of Trump's presidency to solve the border crisis, including the first two with control of both houses of Congress. But they'd much rather make their base live in constant fear of migrant caravans so they can keep having that issue to run on. Political parties care about political power. It's pretty shocking.

Trump Said he wanted to close the border.
Republican voter want to close border.
Republican donor want open border because they like cheap labor.

Donor win, votor loose.

Money talkig big.

We speak English in this country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are open borders?

Democrat policy to release everyone who crosses our border into the interior of our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are open borders?

Democrat policy to release everyone who crosses our border into the interior of our country.

Okay then I guess we don't have open borders