Upper Beach Drive to Remain Closed to Cars Year Round

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Courtland Milloy coined the most apt description of the whiny, entitled, ageist twits who Tweet and agitate for bike lanes and “vibrancy” above all else:

“Myopic little twits.”

Imagine idolizing a douchebag like Courtland Milloy.

Milloy has had his finger on the pulse of many Washingtonians — both Black and White. But you wouldn’t know that.

[Anonymous]

Crap. This is where I live and really increases our drive time. Also puts a ton of cars on residential streets. My house backs up on this area and while reduced traffic is great, it is an extreme inconvenience for thousands of motorists.

[Anonymous]

Curious, how’s Oregon Ave NW? Packed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Courtland Milloy coined the most apt description of the whiny, entitled, ageist twits who Tweet and agitate for bike lanes and “vibrancy” above all else:

“Myopic little twits.”

I can’t believe I’m in agreement with Milloy. There must be snowflakes in Hell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curious, how’s Oregon Ave NW? Packed?

It's not, and never is. This is just more NIMBY hysteria.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

Increasing congestion increases pollution. Thanks for the talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

Increasing congestion increases pollution. Thanks for the talk.

There is already congestion and the park is already closed. At least the park is cleaner now than it was. And going forward it will continue to heal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

Increasing congestion increases pollution. Thanks for the talk.

There is already congestion and the park is already closed. At least the park is cleaner now than it was. And going forward it will continue to heal.

NPS found that continued closure led to increased degradation of habitat in the park due to pedestrian users making their own trails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Crap. This is where I live and really increases our drive time. Also puts a ton of cars on residential streets. My house backs up on this area and while reduced traffic is great, it is an extreme inconvenience for thousands of motorists.

Why doesn’t anyone ever think about the convenience of motorists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Courtland Milloy coined the most apt description of the whiny, entitled, ageist twits who Tweet and agitate for bike lanes and “vibrancy” above all else:

“Myopic little twits.”

I’m shocked a self-important Maryland resident like Milloy doesn’t like paying speed camera fines, parking tickets or obeying traffic laws in general.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Crap. This is where I live and really increases our drive time. Also puts a ton of cars on residential streets. My house backs up on this area and while reduced traffic is great, it is an extreme inconvenience for thousands of motorists.

Why doesn’t anyone ever think about the convenience of motorists?

Our whole society and culture is about the convenience of motorists. That is the problem that needs to be undone in the 21st century.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

Increasing congestion increases pollution. Thanks for the talk.

Increasing the number of cars on the road by making it easier to drive increases pollution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Can you point me to where NPS said “cars were bad for the park”?

When it closed Beach Drive permanently.

Did they? Have a link or evidence?

I’d hate to believe that you’re just making this up.

So you think cars spewing carbon based exhaust into the park is ok?

Thank you for confirming that NPS never said “cars were bad for the park” as the rationale for the decision and that you made that up. I’m glad that you are big enough to admit your error.

Adding pollution is never good for the environment.

Increasing congestion increases pollution. Thanks for the talk.

Increasing the number of cars on the road by making it easier to drive increases pollution.

The number if cars on the road is not being reduced.