Unpopular driving opinions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On 295 earlier and there was speed trap after speed trap after speed trap. The “flow of traffic” was about 65. Gee, I wonder why when there are no police around certain complete idiots think they will take it upon themselves to dictate that the speed limit should be 15-20 miles above that? Could it be because they are selfish pieces of garbage who should be forced to take the basic driving test until the whole “you cannot exceed the speed limit even to pass” gets past their thick skulls?

My unpopular driving opinion is that there are no speed traps on 295.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On 295 earlier and there was speed trap after speed trap after speed trap. The “flow of traffic” was about 65. Gee, I wonder why when there are no police around certain complete idiots think they will take it upon themselves to dictate that the speed limit should be 15-20 miles above that? Could it be because they are selfish pieces of garbage who should be forced to take the basic driving test until the whole “you cannot exceed the speed limit even to pass” gets past their thick skulls?

My unpopular driving opinion is that there are no speed traps on 295.

Were you driving it today, smartass? Because there were at least three.

POS.

Oh better yet, why don’t you try doing 90. Let us all know how it works out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On 295 earlier and there was speed trap after speed trap after speed trap. The “flow of traffic” was about 65. Gee, I wonder why when there are no police around certain complete idiots think they will take it upon themselves to dictate that the speed limit should be 15-20 miles above that? Could it be because they are selfish pieces of garbage who should be forced to take the basic driving test until the whole “you cannot exceed the speed limit even to pass” gets past their thick skulls?

My unpopular driving opinion is that there are no speed traps on 295.

+1,000,000

To add: there is no such thing as a speed trap, only an inattentive and careless driver.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On 295 earlier and there was speed trap after speed trap after speed trap. The “flow of traffic” was about 65. Gee, I wonder why when there are no police around certain complete idiots think they will take it upon themselves to dictate that the speed limit should be 15-20 miles above that? Could it be because they are selfish pieces of garbage who should be forced to take the basic driving test until the whole “you cannot exceed the speed limit even to pass” gets past their thick skulls?

My unpopular driving opinion is that there are no speed traps on 295.

+1,000,000

To add: there is no such thing as a speed trap, only an inattentive and careless driver.

Oh good, so you agree that screaming through the left lane at 85 is a careless driver.

And what do you call cops tucked away on little side roads? I guess they’re just there scrolling their phones and eating donuts.

[Anonymous]

If you have a "student driver" bumper sticker on your car, just turn in your license. We all know you can't drive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
My unpopular opinion is that people have no clue about statistical risk and hardly ever assess risk accurately.

OP with his or her perceived safe speeding proves my point.

OP (hello almost a year later, OP!) is probably the Lake Wobegon of driving. He’s the best driver ever and he alone is a special driver who can and should be going 60 in a 45, 45 in a 30 and however fast he wants to go in a school speed zone when kids are present.

OP is my unpopular driving opinion. People who don’t get it. If I, a pedestrian, get hit by OP doing 60, I’m dead. If I get hit by Distracted Dan doing 20, I’m still injured, but I might not be because I might have been able to get to the curb.

[Anonymous]

Many, if not most, drivers vastly overestimate their ability, particularly as to emergency maneuvers or the behavior of a vehicle at high speeds. Only a minuscule percentage of drivers who have completed any sort of post-licensure driver training, even fewer in actual vehicles under actual driving conditions.

[Anonymous]

“Following” or “keeping up with” the “flow of traffic” is a hallmark of abysmal driving; it abrogates to others the driver’s duty to make reasoned decisions based on their own assessment of conditions as those intersect with the driver’s particular abilities and limitations.

“Leave yourself an out” is a fundamental driver safety practice, rendered impossible by joining a “rat pack” moving down the road as a unit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That anyone convicted drunk driving should be only issued a motorcycle license

You i like

Not a bad idea.

1st DUI offense, 50k fine and home confinement for 1 year.

2nd DUI offense, ankle bracelet for life. 1 million dollar fine, at least.

Have you ever operated a vehicle after consuming even the slightest amount of alcohol? Drugs/medication?

Do you realize that not all police officers are competent or honest?

Hyperbole like yours is silly.

[Anonymous]

If you aren’t backing into parking spaces at this point, you are an imbecile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the Va drivers without front plates should be fined.

All of the MD drivers should be fined.

[Anonymous]

People should be using their horns more. At people slow to move at a green light, people edging out of their lane, etc.

[Anonymous]

Causing a backup of traffic in the left lane or not checking your mirrors to move over when others behind you want to pass should be subject to fines.

[Anonymous]

Zipper lane merge on a highway? Fine. But if we're on Mass ave and traffic is crawling and cars are parked blocking the right lane, and you think you're leap frogging around me in the two-car-lengths space between parked cars, think again. Wait your goddamned turn behind me because all you're doing by trying to get around me is further clogging up the mess.

[Anonymous]

Backing into spaces? Why, you morons who argue against this? Let's say you're going to an event. The time distribution of people arriving is spread out a lot more than the time distribution of people leaving. Backing out of a space (or backing in) takes a lot more time than pulling in. It's way more efficient for people to back in during the time when there are fewer people per minute trying to park. So back in when you arrive, pull out (much quicker and less impact on others) when you leave. This is the way.