New Woodward High School

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

If you want to write Woodward boundary fan fiction, go right ahead. But that's not the plan according to MCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

If you want to write Woodward boundary fan fiction, go right ahead. But that's not the plan according to MCPS.

Right, because MCPS always does what they say, always listens to parentsneighborhoods, and never ever change their mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

And that BCC has about 140 seats available next year, dropping to about even in 2031, and short about 100 in '36. They aren't going to include BCC just to change boundaries again in a few years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

The Troll is strong in this one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

The Troll is strong in this one!

If by posting factual statements that makes sense sure...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

The Troll is strong in this one!

If by posting factual statements that makes sense sure...

"Clearly these schools will be impacted..." is your opinion/guess, not a fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

The Troll is strong in this one!

If by posting factual statements that makes sense sure...

"Clearly these schools will be impacted..." is your opinion/guess, not a fact.

Sure, it's also my opinion that it will snow sometime next winter. Both are equally likely outcomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.

WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.

and BCC which is also adjacent

If the intent was to include BCC along with WJ and the DCC to populate Woodward, why would the plans never mention BCC? It wouldn’t need to be some kind of deep state secret.

The plans DID mention BCC at one point, and BCC parents had a hissy fit (see the Lyttonsville Master Plan or Sector Plan, I forget). BCC was then removed.

This is completely misleading information. Master/Sector plans are land use documents done by the Planning Department - they have no power in school assignment plans.

BCC was also part of the DCC originally but the parents also had a hissy fit then and got them removed.

The BoE already said Woodward is to relieve overcrowding at WJ and in the DCC (with Northwood in the DCC also getting larger). Why would the BoE want to kick the hornet's nest and add BCC to it?

That also has nothing to do with Woodward.

BCC's boundary is adjacent to Woodward and will be part of the boundary shuffling that happens to populate that school and make room for others.

Makes sense that schools who are adjacent to Woodward will be affected but the question is if the BCC parents still have the clout to weasel out of this like everything else.

Woodward doesn't have boundaries yet, so it has no adjacencies. All we have to go on is the CIP, linked earlier, which states that Woodward will be a solution for WJ and DCC schools.

It is located between WJ, Wheaton, BCC, and Einstein. Clearly these schools will be impacted unless maybe some parents with clout are able to once again buy their way out of doing their share.

The Troll is strong in this one!

If by posting factual statements that makes sense sure...

"Clearly these schools will be impacted..." is your opinion/guess, not a fact.

Sure, it's also my opinion that it will snow sometime next winter. Both are equally likely outcomes.