Capital Tryouts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is BLC rebuilding the ‘28 team or has that train left the station?

My guess is that rebuilding is definitely in the works now with the Capital connection.

It’s a shame the Stars program which is in need of help can’t get the same benefit. Especially given the past strong relationship between the programs which has since deteriorated.

Doesn’t Capital already have a relationship with Stars? Makes sense for Capital to work with BLC to feed from MOCO and Stars to feed from NOVA.

Capital used to have a relationship with Stars. That basically ended when TSJ bought Stars and launched a HS team. BLC and Pride are now the primary feeders to Capital. Cap 25s took 60 percent+ Pride girls. Capital can’t formalize a relationship with Pride because Pride has a HS team and Pride wants its players to continue with its program thru HS. But Pride develops players better than Stars, and Pride girls know to get recruited to a good school Capital is by far the better option.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After an exceptional 2023 recruiting year for Capital, this announcement from BLC is even more good news for the club. More evidence that the pipeline of top MoCo players will continue to develop at an extraordinarily high level and feed directly into the best girls high school club in the region.

Welcome to the chat, CLC directors. How much is BLC paying you to try and stop the exodus from BLC to other clubs?! This is a whole lotta words about a whole lotta nothing….

This relationship is a big deal. Gets BLC kids great exposure to Capital at a young age. BLC development is excellent. Those MoCo kids who might have been inclined to jump to MD now have a straight pipeline to Capital. Smart move by the club.

Does this put stars and pride girls at a disadvantage behind BLC girls when trying out for Capital?

Stars? Yes. Pride? No

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After an exceptional 2023 recruiting year for Capital, this announcement from BLC is even more good news for the club. More evidence that the pipeline of top MoCo players will continue to develop at an extraordinarily high level and feed directly into the best girls high school club in the region.

Welcome to the chat, CLC directors. How much is BLC paying you to try and stop the exodus from BLC to other clubs?! This is a whole lotta words about a whole lotta nothing….

This relationship is a big deal. Gets BLC kids great exposure to Capital at a young age. BLC development is excellent. Those MoCo kids who might have been inclined to jump to MD now have a straight pipeline to Capital. Smart move by the club.

“BLC development is excellent.” Lol. Is this some sort of sick joke? BLC parent coaching is a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After an exceptional 2023 recruiting year for Capital, this announcement from BLC is even more good news for the club. More evidence that the pipeline of top MoCo players will continue to develop at an extraordinarily high level and feed directly into the best girls high school club in the region.

Welcome to the chat, CLC directors. How much is BLC paying you to try and stop the exodus from BLC to other clubs?! This is a whole lotta words about a whole lotta nothing….

This relationship is a big deal. Gets BLC kids great exposure to Capital at a young age. BLC development is excellent. Those MoCo kids who might have been inclined to jump to MD now have a straight pipeline to Capital. Smart move by the club.

“BLC development is excellent.” Lol. Is this some sort of sick joke? BLC parent coaching is a joke.

I think it depends on the year - be careful of listening to advice about other grad years. I would imagine that 26 capital will be mostly stars and pride, with a few Baltimore girls who return and a few from other clubs such as MCE or other MoCo clubs. Next level and BLC not strong in that grad year (though a player or two could always make it). I think the landscape could be different in other years.

[Anonymous]

Email was a little too over the top praising Capital, a turn off. Read a lot like the fake BLC Stars partnership a few years back. How did that go? I am sure the BLC parent coaches and the few coaches who played in college want to “learn” from young adults and lower tier FCPS coaches. Maybe BLC will make some commission for sending players to HB. Don’t buy into people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Email was a little too over the top praising Capital, a turn off. Read a lot like the fake BLC Stars partnership a few years back. How did that go? I am sure the BLC parent coaches and the few coaches who played in college want to “learn” from young adults and lower tier FCPS coaches. Maybe BLC will make some commission for sending players to HB. Don’t buy into people.

Are you referring to the BLC partnership from a few years back that pipelined three 2023 midfielders to Capital who committed to Northwestern, UVA and Harvard?

You're talking about that partnership, right?

[Anonymous]

BLC is misleading families. This relationship won’t produce results, BLC has been trying for years. How many BLC players actually make Capital ? This is more of the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BLC is misleading families. This relationship won’t produce results, BLC has been trying for years. How many BLC players actually make Capital ? This is more of the same.

You mean the same results sending recruits to schools like Northwestern, Virginia and Harvard?

[Anonymous]

It is amazing how uniformed people on this site say ridiculous things. The BLC program has been great with parent coaches. Yes the 2023 BLC team led to many successful recruits including Northwestern, UVA and Harvard who currently play for Capital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BLC is misleading families. This relationship won’t produce results, BLC has been trying for years. How many BLC players actually make Capital ? This is more of the same.

Read this closely - it says everything about the fear the MD clubs have over this BLC / Capital relationship.

If they were truly confident in the quality of their own pipelines, they wouldn’t care at all about this.

Future proof they’re worried about Capital’s continuing strength to expand their reach.

Lets also not overlook the possibility these are Pride trolls disguised as MD parents looking for ways to stay relevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Email was a little too over the top praising Capital, a turn off. Read a lot like the fake BLC Stars partnership a few years back. How did that go? I am sure the BLC parent coaches and the few coaches who played in college want to “learn” from young adults and lower tier FCPS coaches. Maybe BLC will make some commission for sending players to HB. Don’t buy into people.

As you can see, these facts aren't well taken here. The same DA keeps commenting and posting about the 23s over and over. Here's a hint, we get it and congrats to those players, but who cares. Maryland clubs get that every year, year in and year out. But hey keep repeating yourself like the JB you are.

The BLC 28 team is worse than most low level rec teams. Pride has some talented teams and seems to develop the best right now. Stars is such a disaster, it's amazing players continue to go there and they continue to exist. If your top feeder clubs for MS all are on the decline and aren't developing talent like they should, then how do you expect those Capital teams to be competitive?

3...2...1... on how long it takes for a response about how MD dads are shaking about the Capital pipeline. Guess what, the people commenting here aren't MD dads.

[Anonymous]

Happy Father’s Day to MD dads

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BLC is misleading families. This relationship won’t produce results, BLC has been trying for years. How many BLC players actually make Capital ? This is more of the same.

Read this closely - it says everything about the fear the MD clubs have over this BLC / Capital relationship.

If they were truly confident in the quality of their own pipelines, they wouldn’t care at all about this.

Future proof they’re worried about Capital’s continuing strength to expand their reach.

Lets also not overlook the possibility these are Pride trolls disguised as MD parents looking for ways to stay relevant.

Wow. Just wow. Fringe Capital parent posting “Q-Level” theories and scenarios. But wait…maybe this is just a Metro parent, posing as a Capital parent getting me to think that…ARGH!

It’s club lacrosse - parents are focused on their daughter’s success and future (and hopefully their teammate’s as well). Capital is focused on fielding the two best teams they can each year, and then helping them reach their goals. Regardless of where those players come from.

[Anonymous]

Anyone crossing Stars off the list is a fool. As long as Kathy Jenkins is involved Stars will be a top program in the area. Just look what Kathy did with a weak Saints team this year. She usually manages to pull the Stars teams together by 8th grade too. She is worth the hassle of St James, she’s that good. She’s also still very closely aligned with Gussie Johns and Capital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone crossing Stars off the list is a fool. As long as Kathy Jenkins is involved Stars will be a top program in the area. Just look what Kathy did with a weak Saints team this year. She usually manages to pull the Stars teams together by 8th grade too. She is worth the hassle of St James, she’s that good. She’s also still very closely aligned with Gussie Johns and Capital.

+1000