Do you think the left struggles with marketing because the right uses professional firms?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

I did. But I still was forced to pay for their public school education they weren’t attending.

NP here. I didn't know that taxes were an a la carte menu. I opposed both the Afghanistan and the Iraq wars. Do I get my taxes back?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

Just wait til they find out that kids are being taught the esoteric Muslim rites of Al-Gebra in public schools.

As long as they are also being taught about other religions, who cares?

What do you mean, "other religions?" Apart from Christian? If they teach about Christianity, they should also have to teach about all of the other major religions in the world. Otherwise, they should teach about NO religions, Christianity included. I personally prefer the latter - didn't you have Sunday school growing up? Why do you need public schools teaching it, too?

That’s what I’m saying Comparative Religions or nothing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

I did. But I still was forced to pay for their public school education they weren’t attending.

So what? You still benefit by having those kids a: be educated regardless of where and b: having your share of property taxes have a tiny amount more impact than if those private school kids were adding to the public school rolls.

I think a poor family who is not being served by the publics should be able to take their tax dollars to a school that does, be it charter or otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

Can a Mom in a poor community? The very people you say you want to help?

She can apply for financial aid.

There’s only so much of that. She already pays. If the school in her district doesn’t teach her kid? She should have the right to put her child elsewhere and her tax dollars should follow her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

I did. But I still was forced to pay for their public school education they weren’t attending.

NP here. I didn't know that taxes were an a la carte menu. I opposed both the Afghanistan and the Iraq wars. Do I get my taxes back?

Defense spending is in the Constitution. Education is not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

Just wait til they find out that kids are being taught the esoteric Muslim rites of Al-Gebra in public schools.

As long as they are also being taught about other religions, who cares?

What do you mean, "other religions?" Apart from Christian? If they teach about Christianity, they should also have to teach about all of the other major religions in the world. Otherwise, they should teach about NO religions, Christianity included. I personally prefer the latter - didn't you have Sunday school growing up? Why do you need public schools teaching it, too?

That’s what I’m saying Comparative Religions or nothing

None of you has gotten that the reference to esoteric Muslim rites of Al-Gebra is a reference to algebra, which was invented by Arabs in the medieval era?

[Anonymous]

The left has issues with “marketing” because no one buys into their ideals.

Let’s take a look at recent events
Most people support the anti-grooming bill in Fl. Polls show an overwhelming majority do in fact not want their kids groomed but are ok with talking about these issues when their kids are older. Only the left believes little kids should be exposed to this.

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support what BLM did with rioting and looting, the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support allowing men to play women a sports - the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support going to war with Russia over Ukraine - the elite left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support illegal immigration- the left does

The list keeps going. It’s nit a marketing problem it’s an ideals issue. The left is selling a product most people don’t want, then censoring you if you are against it. People see they too and they don’t like it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

Just wait til they find out that kids are being taught the esoteric Muslim rites of Al-Gebra in public schools.

As long as they are also being taught about other religions, who cares?

What do you mean, "other religions?" Apart from Christian? If they teach about Christianity, they should also have to teach about all of the other major religions in the world. Otherwise, they should teach about NO religions, Christianity included. I personally prefer the latter - didn't you have Sunday school growing up? Why do you need public schools teaching it, too?

That’s what I’m saying Comparative Religions or nothing

None of you has gotten that the reference to esoteric Muslim rites of Al-Gebra is a reference to algebra, which was invented by Arabs in the medieval era?

Apparently not. Because I don’t really care. It’s how you used it that was important. But you are the smartest person in the room - is that the acknowledgement you wanted, narcissist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The left has issues with “marketing” because no one buys into their ideals.

Let’s take a look at recent events
Most people support the anti-grooming bill in Fl. Polls show an overwhelming majority do in fact not want their kids groomed but are ok with talking about these issues when their kids are older. Only the left believes little kids should be exposed to this.

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support what BLM did with rioting and looting, the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support allowing men to play women a sports - the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support going to war with Russia over Ukraine - the elite left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support illegal immigration- the left does

The list keeps going. It’s nit a marketing problem it’s an ideals issue. The left is selling a product most people don’t want, then censoring you if you are against it. People see they too and they don’t like it

Correct on all counts. And the only responses they give are to name-call. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The left has issues with “marketing” because no one buys into their ideals.

Let’s take a look at recent events
Most people support the anti-grooming bill in Fl. Polls show an overwhelming majority do in fact not want their kids groomed but are ok with talking about these issues when their kids are older. Only the left believes little kids should be exposed to this.

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support what BLM did with rioting and looting, the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support allowing men to play women a sports - the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support going to war with Russia over Ukraine - the elite left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support illegal immigration- the left does

The list keeps going. It’s nit a marketing problem it’s an ideals issue. The left is selling a product most people don’t want, then censoring you if you are against it. People see they too and they don’t like it

Elite left? Define that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

I did. But I still was forced to pay for their public school education they weren’t attending.

NP here. I didn't know that taxes were an a la carte menu. I opposed both the Afghanistan and the Iraq wars. Do I get my taxes back?

Defense spending is in the Constitution. Education is not

A lot of things aren’t in the constitution. Should women vote, then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left struggles with marketing because the right has the massive advantage of just being able to make everything up wholesale and telling the largely uninformed masses that some imaginary boogeyman is coming to get them unless they vote Republican is exponentially easier than trying to make those masses understand the often complex truth.

See Critical Race Theory for the perfect example of this:

GOP: "Schools are trying to teach your kids to hate themselves for being white, and they're trying to take away parents' ability to have input on curriculum."

Masses: "OMG that's terrifying!"

Dems: "Well actually, CRT is an advanced theory that is not being taught directly in primary education, though there are certain concepts stemming from CRT that may lead to changes in curriculum to more accurately reflect the historical experiences of POC. And while school boards have in fact been making changes to reduce the impact of parents who have literally no idea what they are talking about trying to change curriculum to reflect whatever they saw on FOX news last night, they are not discounting the input of parents wholesale."

Masses: "Huh? Were you still talking? I tuned out after 'well, actually.'"

In other words, CRT is indeed being taught in a sneaky manner.

No.

Similarly, number theory isn't sneakily being taught at schools because kids learn about division, just in case you were worried.

From PP’s description of what a democrat will say, i.e. “certain concepts stemming from CRT leading to changes in curriculum”, that’s a sneaky way of teaching CRT. Reducing the impact of what PP seems to call ‘stupid parents who have no clue’ , tells parents that they will pay for something they have no say in. This is why money must follow the child.

Translation: Damn fixed costs of public schools, I must be allowed to put my child in an evangelical private school on the public dime! Seriously though, isn’t that the “socialism” you hate?

No voucher will ever allow your child to attend the same private schools as the truly wealthy. The voucher could be for $100,000/year and they still would make sure it didn’t happen.

There aren’t just evangelical schools. I pay tax dollars towards the public schools. If I don’t like what’s being taught there, I should be able to use that money to educate my child as I see fit. Telling me to ‘butt out’ of my child’s education when I’m paying for it? No Bueno. Not happening. When liberal democrats enroll their kids exclusively in public schools, then they can start preaching. Until then? Nope. Money should follow the child.

But nice try with the ‘evangelical’ school. I’m a Jew

Dp- No one is stopping you from paying for private school. I pay property taxes and I pay for private school. You can too.

I did. But I still was forced to pay for their public school education they weren’t attending.

NP here. I didn't know that taxes were an a la carte menu. I opposed both the Afghanistan and the Iraq wars. Do I get my taxes back?

Defense spending is in the Constitution. Education is not

A lot of things aren’t in the constitution. Should women vote, then?

Wasn’t there an amendment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left has issues with “marketing” because no one buys into their ideals.

Let’s take a look at recent events
Most people support the anti-grooming bill in Fl. Polls show an overwhelming majority do in fact not want their kids groomed but are ok with talking about these issues when their kids are older. Only the left believes little kids should be exposed to this.

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support what BLM did with rioting and looting, the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support allowing men to play women a sports - the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support going to war with Russia over Ukraine - the elite left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support illegal immigration- the left does

The list keeps going. It’s nit a marketing problem it’s an ideals issue. The left is selling a product most people don’t want, then censoring you if you are against it. People see they too and they don’t like it

Elite left? Define that.

Obama, who pushes climate change yet buys two oceanfront mansions
Clintons
Kerrys
Pelosis

I can continue if you’d like

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left has issues with “marketing” because no one buys into their ideals.

Let’s take a look at recent events
Most people support the anti-grooming bill in Fl. Polls show an overwhelming majority do in fact not want their kids groomed but are ok with talking about these issues when their kids are older. Only the left believes little kids should be exposed to this.

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support what BLM did with rioting and looting, the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support allowing men to play women a sports - the left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support going to war with Russia over Ukraine - the elite left does

And overwhelming majority of Americans do not support illegal immigration- the left does

The list keeps going. It’s nit a marketing problem it’s an ideals issue. The left is selling a product most people don’t want, then censoring you if you are against it. People see they too and they don’t like it

Elite left? Define that.

Obama, who pushes climate change yet buys two oceanfront mansions
Clintons
Kerrys
Pelosis

I can continue if you’d like

Wait hang on - do people who don't believe in climate change, think that people who do shouldn't spend time by the ocean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Left has the loudest most visible pulpit in the country. If the President refuses to use it, what are other members of the party supposed to do? It’s Biden’s party. If he can’t articulate what Democrats stand for, who else should?

As one of the other posters so clearly put used the CRT example we get too deep in the weeds. We just need to find something that we all find terrifying and say vote or else you'll get that... We need to let Donald Trump back on Twitter.

The SCOTUS is going to give us one this summer, unfortunately.