Youngkin and TJ

[Anonymous]

I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny that it was whites, not asians, who enslaved blacks, and now they want the asians to be the scapegoat for their hideous crimes.

What does slavery have to do with opportunity hoarding?

Merit based and hard working is NOT opportunity hoarding. White liberals use past oppressions of minorities to promote their evil agenda, which is to further boost white interest. TJ reform is a perfect example.

TJ reform opens access to hardworking, qualified students from all over the county.

We now have better representation from ALL middle schools. Not just the feeders. And we also have a class that looks more like the population of the county.

Who benefited most from these changes? Hardworking, qualified kids who are from economically-disadvantaged families. And hardworking, qualified kids who are URMs.

That's absolutely false! It actually closed doors for those who are most talented in STEM, which should have been the mission TJ education. This is like NBA draft will be purely based on the assessment of playing among the middle schoolers, not in the highest level of games.

This would definitely boost the white numbers in NBA, same as in TJ reform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

so now asians possesses intrinsic intellectual ability? Should the school just be made whole asian- would that be the least racist solution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

You are mental.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

so now asians possesses intrinsic intellectual ability? Should the school just be made whole asian- would that be the least racist solution?

Why do we always have race in mind if we're not racist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

so now asians possesses intrinsic intellectual ability? Should the school just be made whole asian- would that be the least racist solution?

Oh. The answer to this question should be good. 🍿

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

You are mental.

If telling the truth is mental...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

so now asians possesses intrinsic intellectual ability? Should the school just be made whole asian- would that be the least racist solution?

Why do we always have race in mind if we're not racist?

The application process is race-blind. They are including top kids from ALL middle schools vs feeder schools.

The parents who want to continue to game the system can move accordingly.

[Anonymous]

Wow.

An academy would be best possible solution. With the exception of Maggie Walker, every other Govenors school is only PT/Academy.

There is no a single class that a TJ freshman or sophomore takes that is not offered at almost every other HS. That school should be used only for classes a child cannot get at their base school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

You are mental.

If telling the truth is mental...

I’m sure you believe it’s “the truth” in your altered reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

White kids are still underrepresented and you don't hear any white parents complaining about it. The biggest gains were from URM students, but the system must be racist because it isn't possible for a black child to be as qualified as an asian child.

Underrepresented relative to what? To their population or merit? Stop trying to fool people with the population quota crap.

so now asians possesses intrinsic intellectual ability? Should the school just be made whole asian- would that be the least racist solution?

Why do we always have race in mind if we're not racist?

The application process is race-blind. They are including top kids from ALL middle schools vs feeder schools.

The parents who want to continue to game the system can move accordingly.

It's already not race-blind when you put quota on each school, because you already know the demographics of the schools in advance. Who are you trying to fool?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think both ideas are true. The reforms did open the doors to hardworking, qualified students from across the county, but it also lacks the granularity to identify the truly elite talents in the county.

The reform purposely eliminated granularity (such as admission tests and teacher's recommendations) so that the less competitive white people can benefit from the overall lower standards and increased randomness.

You are mental.

If telling the truth is mental...

I’m sure you believe it’s “the truth” in your altered reality.

Of course, the truth that your pea brain couldn't understand is an altered reality to you. Perfectly understandable.