Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Trump mocking Christine Ford tonight at his rally, ending with "they want to destroy people, really evil people"

https://twitter.com/andrewkimmel/status/1047285291730460672

So he’s quadrupling down, eh? He must feel Mueller’s breath at the back of his cotton candy pompadour.
Anonymous
On hearing her testimony, I thought Ford was delusional. I thought that she was pitiful, but believed what she was saying. On reflection--and after reading Mitchell's assessment of the inconsistencies--I think she was lying. She was very good at it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There will be two outcomes: 1) 80% chance Brett is confirmed, or 2) Republicans gains majority in the senate by ridding red-state democrats in the mid term. McConnell needs to wrap this up quickly. I prefer Kavanaugh is voted down by Manchin, Flake and Collins. It will be a sure thing for them to lose their next elections.


Sorry dear. Flake has no next election. Collins will meanwhile lose her election if she votes FOR BK and she knows it.


Sorry the math is against your wish. It comes down to Collins, MurKowski, Flake, Manchin, and Heitkamp. Kavanaugh only needs 2 out of 5. Collins' election is 2 years away. Flake has not switched party yet. He will most likely be confirmed.


I don't think Trump's speech this evening is going to help with Collins and Murkowski.

What’s the pond scum saying tonight?

He said if he lied to congress that changes things.
Anonymous
It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?


No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.


Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."


No. That’s called telling the truth. Kavanaugh himself said he spent all his time studying, going to Mass, and doing service projects. He could have gone with the “I was kind of wild in high school” defense, and everybody would have understood, but he didn’t. He went full choir boy, although he has had to walk that back now that he has been exposed as untrustworthy.


I don't agree that they "would have understood." He would have immediately been rejected and possibly faced other consequences.

If anything, the response to the various MeToo stories suggests that outright denial is probably the best strategy, unless someone has a smoking gun.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.


Hmm. Wasn't it the liar, Richard Blumenthal, who used that phrase in reference to Kavanaugh? What nerve. And how amusing that you missed the irony entirely.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408857-rep-sen-blumenthal-lied-for-years-should-reconsider-questioning-kavanaughs
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!


The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.


Hmm. Wasn't it the liar, Richard Blumenthal, who used that phrase in reference to Kavanaugh? What nerve. And how amusing that you missed the irony entirely.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408857-rep-sen-blumenthal-lied-for-years-should-reconsider-questioning-kavanaughs


Takes one to know one?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?


No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.


Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."


No. That’s called telling the truth. Kavanaugh himself said he spent all his time studying, going to Mass, and doing service projects. He could have gone with the “I was kind of wild in high school” defense, and everybody would have understood, but he didn’t. He went full choir boy, although he has had to walk that back now that he has been exposed as untrustworthy.


NO HE DIDN’T. In fact, he said “I liked beer.” He also said he wasn’t perfect, but he was innocent of the ridiculous charges.
#LeftyLies


That was later! That’s not where he started. I’m glad your reality is so fluid. You need it with a guy like Bart, I mean Brett.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Holy Smoke. Just read the beach rental letter. That has to be fake. Is it fake? "Bart"? "Welcomed with open _________"? FFFF. OMG. OMG. Where did they get this letter? Is it really from 1983?

I know, I would like to see that corroborated somewhere else, too. It just hits too many of the same notes -“fffff” “Bart,” etc. If it’s real though


It is real.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did Trump basically just declare a war on women? My head is about to explode!

You know who doesn’t care about the good of the country: KAVANAUGH. I don’t care about the charges (though I care that he lied about his yearbook), but if he wasn’t partisan - wouldn’t he step down and stay in his already cushy job. But, he’s in if for himself and he says that he supports this raging partisan battle.


It’s unbelievable that the left feels intimidation is a legitimate political tactic and not an immoral and disgusting technique reserved for dictators, banana republics, and the mob.


What is unbelievable is that Trump is daring women like you not to vote for him, by saying shitty things, and you do nevertheless.


I’ve voted Democrat all my life, but after this unbelievable farce which appears to be the last gasp of desperation of an already lost party I think I will probably vote red in November. Mostly because the democratic message isn’t about Helping workers, promoting American liberty or world peace. It’s about hating trump because he doesn’t speak politely. There is no message for the Democrats and it’s an embarrassment.


You're embarrassed by the Dems having no message, so you prefer Trump?

Good riddance.

This post is a good candidate for deletion from the forum. Hard to believe it's real


Wow. So now you're the arbiter for what is and isn't real on this forum?? Perhaps it's *your* post that should be deleted because you just seem like a complete a-hole. -DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2



If ever there was a post that should be deleted... you are sick.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's only been two days of FBI investigation. Imagine what else is going to come out.

Your guy is TOAST. Trump hates drunks!


The FBI is wrapping up. They're just about done.


Highly unlikely. But in any event, The New York Times and other investigative media outlets are still very busy and keep exposing him as a liar - forget the sexual assault charges. The country is finding out he is unfit and he now has the lowest public approval rating of any SC nominee ever.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2



If ever there was a post that should be deleted... you are sick.

DP. Did you click through to that link? It’s literally like Fairfax Underground for people nominally connected to law. The screenname “Bart O Kavanaugh” isn’t proof it was him writing, but it seems most likely to be him or Judge. Probably not a lot of Mark Judge superfans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2



If ever there was a post that should be deleted... you are sick.


The sick ones are the creators of the Bart O’Kavanaugh persona, Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: