Who do you think is going to win and why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dawson GA, a Trump + 68 county, just exceeded its 2020 vote total in early voting alone.

I guess Republicans are pissed about the lawfare and assassination attempts.

Are you psychotic? The city of Dawson, GA - which according to this map was +53 for Biden in 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Georgia - is in Terrell County, which, according to the chart on this website https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Georgia went for Biden by 8 points in 2020, and in any case according to the data here https://election.lab.ufl.edu/early-vote/2024-early-voting/2024-general-election-early-vote-georgia/ 2,718 citizens of that fine county have voted.

Meaning I don’t know where you get your info from or what you think it means but I don’t think you’re reading that right.

Calm down. Did you take your meds this morning? Dawson County, GA.

https://abcnews.go.com/Elections/georgia-county-presidential-election-results-2020

[Anonymous]

Four days before election and trump keeps putting both feet in his mouth every time he speaks! Women are going to give Kamala a huge win. I even believe there will be a good number of MAGAs who may simply not vote because of Trump's comments about taking care of women whether they like or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's reality then there is the MAGA delulu. Harris will win this easily, and I can even see a map in which she landslides.

it's going to be hard for the red brigade next week.

Harris has a much more difficult path to 270 than he does.

No, she really doesn't.

Harris voter here and I think she does. People really do NOT like her and I think we underestimate that.

It's not just that people don't like her, it's that people are smart enough to realize that they didn't vote for her to be the nominee and they rejected her the last time they had the chance to vote for her directly, yet "Democracy is on the ballot."

Nope.

There are thousands of GOP voters switching from Trump to Harris in PA, WI, MI.

This will be clearly evident come election day and the following days as the votes get counted.

+1. This is one area I don't see the media covering at all. The Never Trump part of the GOP has grown. Hell, I think a lot of the Republicans in Congress are going to vote for Harris.

Case in point:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes lawfare, as in Biden’s “we’ve gotta lock him up”.

The fatal flaw in your "lawfare" theory is that there is abundant evidence that Trump actually committed the crimes he is being investigated for. Certainly enough evidence for an indictment. It's not "lawfare," it's literally just enforcing the laws as written.

If there wasn't enough evidence, the indictments and trials never would have proceed. For an example of this, just look at when your Orange God said he was going to "lock her up," but was unable to find even a single crime of Hillary's with enough evidence for a grand jury to indict, because unlike Trump, she isn't a career criminal.

[Anonymous]

I have received maybe three election flyers in my us mail this whole election season. I usually get 100 or more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lawfare, as in Biden’s “we’ve gotta lock him up”.

The fatal flaw in your "lawfare" theory is that there is abundant evidence that Trump actually committed the crimes he is being investigated for. Certainly enough evidence for an indictment. It's not "lawfare," it's literally just enforcing the laws as written.

If there wasn't enough evidence, the indictments and trials never would have proceed. For an example of this, just look at when your Orange God said he was going to "lock her up," but was unable to find even a single crime of Hillary's with enough evidence for a grand jury to indict, because unlike Trump, she isn't a career criminal.

Through novel legal theory and stacking charges and cases where the parties don't even claim damages. Yeah, right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lawfare, as in Biden’s “we’ve gotta lock him up”.

The fatal flaw in your "lawfare" theory is that there is abundant evidence that Trump actually committed the crimes he is being investigated for. Certainly enough evidence for an indictment. It's not "lawfare," it's literally just enforcing the laws as written.

If there wasn't enough evidence, the indictments and trials never would have proceed. For an example of this, just look at when your Orange God said he was going to "lock her up," but was unable to find even a single crime of Hillary's with enough evidence for a grand jury to indict, because unlike Trump, she isn't a career criminal.

Give me a break. Changing the statute of limitations, going after Trump for documents but saying Biden was too senile for charges, the list of nonsense goes on and on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dawson GA, a Trump + 68 county, just exceeded its 2020 vote total in early voting alone.

I guess Republicans are pissed about the lawfare and assassination attempts.

Lawfare?

They think there shouldn’t have been any consequences for Trump fomenting an insurrection, or raping a woman, or stealing documents. But did you know that Hillary Clinton used a private email server?*

*which Trump and many in his administration did, too.

He didn’t rape anyone. That lady’s story was a joke and everyone knows it.

If telling people to “peacefully protest” is an insurrection, then all dems are guilty too.

Biden stole documents and showed to his ghost writer. Unlike Trump he has no ability to declassify. DOJ said he’s guilty but super old and DC jury wouldn’t convict a Dem anyway.

They never even bothered to say what the felony was in NY. If signing an NDA is a crime, then Doug’s Nanny and girlfriend probably have something to share.

NP here, you are just repeating line after line of the insane MAGA talking points you must have heard in the media a hundred times. Please, please stop with the deep denial. Trump is the one who has threatened to "lock her up" for the last decade.

[Anonymous]

Trump is now running 8.2 points ahead of where he was on this day in 2020, according to RCP’s aggregation of national polls. Yeah, I say it would be something of a shock if he didn’t win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now running 8.2 points ahead of where he was on this day in 2020, according to RCP’s aggregation of national polls. Yeah, I say it would be something of a shock if he didn’t win.

Prepare to be shocked, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dawson GA, a Trump + 68 county, just exceeded its 2020 vote total in early voting alone.

I guess Republicans are pissed about the lawfare and assassination attempts.

Lawfare?

They think there shouldn’t have been any consequences for Trump fomenting an insurrection, or raping a woman, or stealing documents. But did you know that Hillary Clinton used a private email server?*

*which Trump and many in his administration did, too.

He didn’t rape anyone. That lady’s story was a joke and everyone knows it.

If telling people to “peacefully protest” is an insurrection, then all dems are guilty too.

Biden stole documents and showed to his ghost writer. Unlike Trump he has no ability to declassify. DOJ said he’s guilty but super old and DC jury wouldn’t convict a Dem anyway.

They never even bothered to say what the felony was in NY. If signing an NDA is a crime, then Doug’s Nanny and girlfriend probably have something to share.

NP here, you are just repeating line after line of the insane MAGA talking points you must have heard in the media a hundred times. Please, please stop with the deep denial. Trump is the one who has threatened to "lock her up" for the last decade.

Screaming talking points isn’t an argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Four days before election and trump keeps putting both feet in his mouth every time he speaks! Women are going to give Kamala a huge win. I even believe there will be a good number of MAGAs who may simply not vote because of Trump's comments about taking care of women whether they like or not.

I have to point out that our beloved president is the one with feet in his mouth this week. OK Joe, let’s have you shuffle back to the basement for a few days!

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/halloween-celebrations-at-white-house-go-viral-president-joe-biden-bites-baby-dressed-as-chicken-sucks-another-babys-foot/articleshow/114801065.cms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lawfare, as in Biden’s “we’ve gotta lock him up”.

The fatal flaw in your "lawfare" theory is that there is abundant evidence that Trump actually committed the crimes he is being investigated for. Certainly enough evidence for an indictment. It's not "lawfare," it's literally just enforcing the laws as written.

If there wasn't enough evidence, the indictments and trials never would have proceed. For an example of this, just look at when your Orange God said he was going to "lock her up," but was unable to find even a single crime of Hillary's with enough evidence for a grand jury to indict, because unlike Trump, she isn't a career criminal.

Give me a break. Changing the statute of limitations, going after Trump for documents but saying Biden was too senile for charges, the list of nonsense goes on and on.

Oh please. The main difference about the documents which everyone knows so that Biden had a few he kept probably by mistake and promptly returned and Trump repeatedly refused to give the documents he took back and actively hid them.

And we aren’t even going to discuss the possibility he compromised US intelligence personnel and assets.

[Anonymous]

I think Harris is going to win. I don't believe the polls are accurate. I believe that the young voters aren't being counted in the polls. After the election they will see that the young girls are voting in much larger block than they are polling and the large majority are for Harris. I'd be willing to put money on the young girls changing the results of the election in favor of Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now running 8.2 points ahead of where he was on this day in 2020, according to RCP’s aggregation of national polls. Yeah, I say it would be something of a shock if he didn’t win.

Prepare to be shocked, then.

Nah, I think Trump has this one locked up. He’s running ahead of both his 2020 and 2016 pace, not just in polling but in early votes too. But we’ll all see for sure on Tuesday night.