Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the carousel of Republican respectability moves forward. Every year we get to hear about how the Republicans of yesteryear were actually the normal good ones and the current ones are "scary" "fascist" "chilling." It's been going on since W when I was a young teen.

Such utter BS. Yes, I loathed Bush, Jr. No, I NEVER feared that he would try to overthrow an election. He was able to express genuine sympathy at memorials. He didn’t call his opponents Tampons. If you can’t see the difference it’s because your lips are stuck to Trump’s @ss limiting your vision.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/dec/24/uselections2000.usa2
Here's a contemporary source saying Bush pulled off a COUP. Yes, this is what everyone was saying back then. That he stole the election. I disliked him then and now, I don't care whose funeral he cried at.
Trump will be dead soon and you'll be saying he wasn't that bad, the NEW GUY is the real devil.

He and the supreme court indeed stole the election, thanks in part to the Roger Stone Brooks Brothers riots) that starred, among others, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett,

That may be true. The point is, his reputation has been completely rehabilitated 20 years later and Dems all talk about him fondly. FONDLY! It would have been unthinkable to imagine.

Nope. His politics suck, and he was a horrible president. I’ve always said, though, even when he was President, that I could imagine having an enjoyable dinner with him — as long as we didn’t discuss politics. Seeing Bush as a pleasant person, and even speaking fondly of him as, say, a proud grandpa, doesn’t change how horrible and damaging he was as President. I don’t know anyone who would view his image as “rehabilitated “ — much less “completely “.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so shocking that creepy guy like Vance and rapists like Trump are trying to strip women of bodily autonomy and access to birth control. It’s almost like they want them barefoot and pregnant and are supremely angry at childless cat ladies reject them and are taking white men jobs.

These guys are so predictable and pathetic.

So much more important stuff going on than having moved abortion terms to the state level from the federal level.

How many abortions a year in America? 1M?

That's your opinion. Many of us think it's a very big deal for women to be able to have control over their own bodies.

Can’t you control your body over to the neighboring state and get your abortion then?

The incessant time and number of appeals on abortion topics choking the appellate and scotus court systems every year by multiple cases and states is why it get rules a State jurisdiction matter

Vote or life in a state how you want it.

Stop clogging up the courts time every quarter on the same stuff. 9 week term, 40 week term, 20 week term. Never, always.

Go bug and lobby your state now. Not everyone.

[Anonymous]

Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

[Anonymous]

Jady Vance sure is one pretty gal: https://www.thecut.com/article/did-j-d-vance-wear-eyeliner-for-the-vp-debate.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Found a nice side-by-side:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

Oh, you sweet summer child!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

Oh, you sweet summer child!

Children are!?!

[Anonymous]

Omg. They must it know if any of the various birth control methods either. Free at school or PP. Yikes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

You truly are a moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

You can get free condoms at any reproductive clinic, free clinic, or college health center in America. Or you can pay less than it costs to eat at McDonald’s and buy a box of them at a drug store.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jamelle Bouie, Times columnist It’s a pretty straightforward verdict: Vance won this debate. It’s not hard to see why. He has spent most of his adult life selling himself to the wealthy, the powerful and the influential. He is as smooth and practiced as they come. He has no regard for the truth. He lies as easily as he breathes. We saw this throughout the debate. He told Americans that there are 20 million to 25 million “illegal aliens” — a lie. He told Americans that Mexico is responsible for the nation’s illegal gun problem — a lie. He told Americans that Trump actually tried to save the Affordable Care Act — a lie. If Vance had to sell the benefits of asbestos to win office, he would do it well and do it with a smile.

IMO this is a necessary skill for the leader of the U.S. (or VP) at this moment in time, given the events going on in the world. He is who I would want going into tense negotiations with world leaders, not Kamala or Walz (though Walz is very likable and I think he is great guy).

"Tense negotiations" are not staredowns. They are diplomatic paperwork affairs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor women can’t get to another state but yes, let’s make them carry to term a baby they can’t afford.
Think.

What? Who is getting pregnant if they are not in a stable situation and can not afford to raise a baby?

You can get free condoms at any reproductive clinic, free clinic, or college health center in America. Or you can pay less than it costs to eat at McDonald’s and buy a box of them at a drug store.

Forced birthers keep proving they don’t understand anything.

[Anonymous]

Vance won the debate hands down. And Walz eclipsed Mondale’s gaffe from 1984.