Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lordy there are… well, you know.

“Former President Trump allegedly shared sensitive information with Mar-a-Lago member Anthony Pratt on calls he had with the leaders of Iraq and Ukraine, according to audio leaked to Australian media.”
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/23/trump-australian-billionaire-sensitive-information-leaked-audio

Maybe we shouldn't insult the man who has our national secrets? Just a thought.

[Anonymous]

It’s so funny how all these people are his best friends until the second they say something contrary to what he wants them to. Yet once again, half the country thinks this nut job should be President again.

I pine for the days when Gary Hart’s political career came to a screeching halt because he was photographed in the company of someone other than his wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so funny how all these people are his best friends until the second they say something contrary to what he wants them to. Yet once again, half the country thinks this nut job should be President again.

I pine for the days when Gary Hart’s political career came to a screeching halt because he was photographed in the company of someone other than his wife.

Yeah. And Joe Biden's bid collapsed in '88 because some speech writer ripped off a few lines from Neil Kinnock. And Howard Dean's campaign collapsed because of uttering the single sound "Heyaaaah"

[Anonymous]

BUT BUT BUT - her emails!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

I don't expect consistency from people who screamed about Clinton dodging the draft and made light of Kerry's actual service in Vietnam, yet have no issue with Trump's "bone spurs" and constant and documented denigration of those who did serve.

[Anonymous]

Cannon is trying to draw out the timeline for Trump's trial. Can the government appeal the delays? Is " I have too many crimes to defend" a valid reason for delays, especially Iid Trump doesn't have to appear in person most days?

[Anonymous]

If**

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cannon is trying to draw out the timeline for Trump's trial. Can the government appeal the delays? Is " I have too many crimes to defend" a valid reason for delays, especially Iid Trump doesn't have to appear in person most days?

Trump wants Cannon (and Chutkan) to delay his trials while his ridiculous “presidential immunity” claims are litigated all the way to SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cannon is trying to draw out the timeline for Trump's trial. Can the government appeal the delays? Is " I have too many crimes to defend" a valid reason for delays, especially Iid Trump doesn't have to appear in person most days?

Yes, Cannon is obviously drawing this out for him. She's making a play to get a promotion if he gets elected. That's been clear for a while now. Unfortunately DOJ cannot appeal from these scheduling orders. The action is in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so funny how all these people are his best friends until the second they say something contrary to what he wants them to. Yet once again, half the country thinks this nut job should be President again.

I pine for the days when Gary Hart’s political career came to a screeching halt because he was photographed in the company of someone other than his wife.

Yeah. And Joe Biden's bid collapsed in '88 because some speech writer ripped off a few lines from Neil Kinnock. And Howard Dean's campaign collapsed because of uttering the single sound "Heyaaaah"

simpler times... sigh.

-former R

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

At what point does the Special Counsel appeal her decisions to the higher court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At what point does the Special Counsel appeal her decisions to the higher court?

She hadn't done anything that would allow for an appeal, but it seems she finally may have done so with the CIPA order.

[Anonymous]

The GOP welcomes this culture of corruption and wishes to establish it nationwide!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At what point does the Special Counsel appeal her decisions to the higher court?

She hadn't done anything that would allow for an appeal, but it seems she finally may have done so with the CIPA order.

CIPA order? Please help translate!