Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not seeing how showing a video of a woman giving birth is harassment in the context of a director giving direction to an actor replicating this same act. Is this not simply showing an example? Can someone explain?

For one thing, the woman in question has given birth 4 times already and said "no I don't want to watch this graphic video".

Ok that doesn’t make it pornography or sexual harassment.

The point is that it's part of a pattern. You want to nitpick one or two things while ignoring the elephant in the room.

no, stringing together multiple non-harassing things does not turn it into a pattern of sexual harassment. It turns it into a pattern of Lively distoring/exaggerating.

Agree, it just seems that she wanted to get back at him for saying less than flattering things about her. Cooler heads should have prevailed.

It was a targeted PR attack to plant negative stories including using fake accounts and manipulation of reddit threads and is being strongly critiqued in PR circles. Redditors have noted that mentioning specific PR names tied to the case has led to sudden bot downvotes (Jed Wallace)

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueReddit/s/4bCOgQeLxr

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomanceBooks/s/5Sw05dYw3v

We’ll see. Even if true, that doesn’t make a case for sexual harassment. It seems Blake hasn’t been popular with many od her co-stars, including female co-stars.

If she has to keep coming up with new arguments to support her claims of being a victim, while ignoring her own PR campaign against JB, the case is not as shocking as she thinks. .She exhibits a bizarre victim mentality for someone who has wealth and fortune in the top one percent.

JB is bankrolled by his smarmy billionaire friend. Cry harder for this pervy man who tried to ally himself with women to advance his own selfish agenda. Glad his name is tarnished now.

I am not crying,. It is puzzling that it is okay for Blake and her sexy, manly husband to intimidate people to get their way; yet, everyone has to kiss Blake's ass. Must be wonderful to have such a high opinion of oneself.

Sexy manly husband? Lol. Ok, weirdo. Did Ryan Reynolds refuse to sign an autograph for you or something?

Nope. I just find his voice, demeanor, smugness, and beady eyes very off-putting. I don't understand why anyone thinks that he is sexy or funny. Sorry Blake!

Who cares? This isn’t even about him.

It is because he involved himself on the production and fought with Baldoni.

You seem personally invested in this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird you guys keep saying "she'll never work again" It sounds more like it's what you desire to happen because she spoke up.

By all means speak up. But just like if a POC sues someone over racism, it's possible that they might find it harder to find work again because of the supposed drama they bring. Acting may be the way actors make their living but it's hardly a "job". Nobody has to hire them.

What are you talking about? Care to back this up with facts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not seeing how showing a video of a woman giving birth is harassment in the context of a director giving direction to an actor replicating this same act. Is this not simply showing an example? Can someone explain?

For one thing, the woman in question has given birth 4 times already and said "no I don't want to watch this graphic video".

Ok that doesn’t make it pornography or sexual harassment.

The point is that it's part of a pattern. You want to nitpick one or two things while ignoring the elephant in the room.

no, stringing together multiple non-harassing things does not turn it into a pattern of sexual harassment. It turns it into a pattern of Lively distoring/exaggerating.

Agree, it just seems that she wanted to get back at him for saying less than flattering things about her. Cooler heads should have prevailed.

It was a targeted PR attack to plant negative stories including using fake accounts and manipulation of reddit threads and is being strongly critiqued in PR circles. Redditors have noted that mentioning specific PR names tied to the case has led to sudden bot downvotes (Jed Wallace)

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueReddit/s/4bCOgQeLxr

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomanceBooks/s/5Sw05dYw3v

We’ll see. Even if true, that doesn’t make a case for sexual harassment. It seems Blake hasn’t been popular with many od her co-stars, including female co-stars.

If she has to keep coming up with new arguments to support her claims of being a victim, while ignoring her own PR campaign against JB, the case is not as shocking as she thinks. .She exhibits a bizarre victim mentality for someone who has wealth and fortune in the top one percent.

JB is bankrolled by his smarmy billionaire friend. Cry harder for this pervy man who tried to ally himself with women to advance his own selfish agenda. Glad his name is tarnished now.

I am not crying,. It is puzzling that it is okay for Blake and her sexy, manly husband to intimidate people to get their way; yet, everyone has to kiss Blake's ass. Must be wonderful to have such a high opinion of oneself.

Sexy manly husband? Lol. Ok, weirdo. Did Ryan Reynolds refuse to sign an autograph for you or something?

Nope. I just find his voice, demeanor, smugness, and beady eyes very off-putting. I don't understand why anyone thinks that he is sexy or funny. Sorry Blake!

Who cares? This isn’t even about him.

It is because he involved himself on the production and fought with Baldoni.

You seem personally invested in this.

Okay. I'll say that I can't wait to watch the trial while eating popcorn..I love Hollywood dirt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird you guys keep saying "she'll never work again" It sounds more like it's what you desire to happen because she spoke up.

By all means speak up. But just like if a POC sues someone over racism, it's possible that they might find it harder to find work again because of the supposed drama they bring. Acting may be the way actors make their living but it's hardly a "job". Nobody has to hire them.

A blonde blue eyed Blake has a better standing then a POC though. Some people are talking like it's a for sure thing she will get work again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird you guys keep saying "she'll never work again" It sounds more like it's what you desire to happen because she spoke up.

By all means speak up. But just like if a POC sues someone over racism, it's possible that they might find it harder to find work again because of the supposed drama they bring. Acting may be the way actors make their living but it's hardly a "job". Nobody has to hire them.

What are you talking about? Care to back this up with facts?

It all seems self explanatory to me. Lively is speaking up, and studios might see her as someone who might be too hard to work with. Therefore, studios or directors might not want to work with her. It would be hard for her to prove discrimination. Choosing who they want to act in their movies is totally at the movie makers discretion. It's not as if she has the right to a movie role.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird you guys keep saying "she'll never work again" It sounds more like it's what you desire to happen because she spoke up.

By all means speak up. But just like if a POC sues someone over racism, it's possible that they might find it harder to find work again because of the supposed drama they bring. Acting may be the way actors make their living but it's hardly a "job". Nobody has to hire them.

What are you talking about? Care to back this up with facts?

It all seems self explanatory to me. Lively is speaking up, and studios might see her as someone who might be too hard to work with. Therefore, studios or directors might not want to work with her. It would be hard for her to prove discrimination. Choosing who they want to act in their movies is totally at the movie makers discretion. It's not as if she has the right to a movie role.

No i believe you said POC who stand up for themselves won’t work again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird you guys keep saying "she'll never work again" It sounds more like it's what you desire to happen because she spoke up.

By all means speak up. But just like if a POC sues someone over racism, it's possible that they might find it harder to find work again because of the supposed drama they bring. Acting may be the way actors make their living but it's hardly a "job". Nobody has to hire them.

What are you talking about? Care to back this up with facts?

It all seems self explanatory to me. Lively is speaking up, and studios might see her as someone who might be too hard to work with. Therefore, studios or directors might not want to work with her. It would be hard for her to prove discrimination. Choosing who they want to act in their movies is totally at the movie makers discretion. It's not as if she has the right to a movie role.

No i believe you said POC who stand up for themselves won’t work again.

Sorry to jump it but this is an always a risk to reporting people but why are yall so gleeful about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But the complaint from Baldoni says there was a hired intimacy coordinator and that he worked on these scenes with that person without BL because BL said she didn’t need to meet with the person before filming started , and produced texts to that effect. And the comment about his own sexual experience came after she made a comment about her own. I don’t know - the whole thing seems off to me. I think they have to dispose all these other witnesses and then we will see.

Difference of communications. Neither one of their comments were graphic.

[Anonymous]

Blake is lying about a lot of things. Heath did walk in while she was breastfeeding. He said he knocked but I'll give a benefit of doubt and say it was one of those simultaneously knocks while opening the door. He said she was covered and it wasn't a big deal. Later on she joked they made eye contact.

Justin is also lying. He says he wasn't aware of her list of demands and complaints but doesn't deny they had a meeting because of his behavior. Blake did ask what beanie would be sexier for her character to wear that would make sense to stay true. Keyword character. Justin uses this to justify talking about her cleavage and taking her jacket or whatever off and on. He's wrong for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake is lying about a lot of things. Heath did walk in while she was breastfeeding. He said he knocked but I'll give a benefit of doubt and say it was one of those simultaneously knocks while opening the door. He said she was covered and it wasn't a big deal. Later on she joked they made eye contact.

Justin is also lying. He says he wasn't aware of her list of demands and complaints but doesn't deny they had a meeting because of his behavior. Blake did ask what beanie would be sexier for her character to wear that would make sense to stay true. Keyword character. Justin uses this to justify talking about her cleavage and taking her jacket or whatever off and on. He's wrong for that.

So team no one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is lying about a lot of things. Heath did walk in while she was breastfeeding. He said he knocked but I'll give a benefit of doubt and say it was one of those simultaneously knocks while opening the door. He said she was covered and it wasn't a big deal. Later on she joked they made eye contact.

Justin is also lying. He says he wasn't aware of her list of demands and complaints but doesn't deny they had a meeting because of his behavior. Blake did ask what beanie would be sexier for her character to wear that would make sense to stay true. Keyword character. Justin uses this to justify talking about her cleavage and taking her jacket or whatever off and on. He's wrong for that.

So team no one?

He's showed she's lied already but I assume he's not all the way innocent.

[Anonymous]

OT

What does nonny mean? Someone called me it in a another thread but I don't like the energy coming from the people so I am asking here lol

[Anonymous]

https://www.thetimes.com/article/71b7b93c-6dd1-468a-a3fd-e2e81f951df9?shareToken=81b3d66ecc01670b3e97d28db0032710

Well worth a read

[Anonymous]

Blake is one of those lifelong scheming mean girls who say and do anything to get ahead. She can’t come to grips with the fact millions of people don’t like her. This all seems like a half-baked scheme to repair her shitty image and frame her as a victim.

I honestly don’t even understand how she’s still famous. She can’t act for shit and her looks are dime a dozen. At her age and low talent level, she should be starring in Lifetime movies with the other literal Mean Girl actress.

[Anonymous]

I see this thread has contributed nicely to the planned smear campaign let loose on her. You all , or most, bought in, and pretty quickly. Tsk tsk tsk.

Now- clearly we all understand how Trump got elected, right?