Savannah Guthrie’s mom is missing, suspect kidnapping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.

]
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.

Savannah has enough sway in the industry and connections to get her cancelled though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another comment on another board asked if this was a birthday dinner for Nancy as her birthday was 1/27. If it was a birthday dinner, how interesting that none of her friends attended or other family members.

That’s not awfully interesting. 84 is a great age, but not a “milestone” birthday. A dinner at my house is exactly how I expect my own parents would hope to celebrate.

It’s interesting in that if it was planned as a celebration, given her recent birthday, that there were no other guests or witnesses to the dinner. Did she actually make it to the dinner? Was there a dinner?

The uber driver may have picked up a woman, but was it the mother?

They had dinner and played mahjongg. Its not that deep. Don't you do things like this with your family?

We did the exact same thing for my mother in law’s birthday. We had food and cake at my house. No guests, especially since it wasn’t a milestone birthday. This is how most old people celebrate, even ones who have lots of friends. A lot of them don’t want fuss or to make their friends go out.

+1

And it may not have even been a celebration. We get together once a month for dinner/games with our local MIL who lives alone (by CHOICE!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?

For those not familiar:

Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.

Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal

I’m not familiar with Tucson and can’t find much online—what animals can drag away a person? Mountain lion? Pack of wild dogs or feral hogs (pack animals are scary)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.

]
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.

Savannah has enough sway in the industry and connections to get her cancelled though.

Maybe SG thinks she's on to something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?

For those not familiar:

Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.

Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal

I’m not familiar with Tucson and can’t find much online—what animals can drag away a person? Mountain lion? Pack of wild dogs or feral hogs (pack animals are scary)?

Africanized Honey Bees may have swarmed her, and levitated her "light as a feather, stiff as aboard".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?

For those not familiar:

Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.

Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal

I’m not familiar with Tucson and can’t find much online—what animals can drag away a person? Mountain lion? Pack of wild dogs or feral hogs (pack animals are scary)?

Mountain lion
Black bears
Pack of Javelina

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.

Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.

She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.

What is so scary about his appearance?

[Anonymous]

If the BIL did it, where did he keep her? It is possible that he killed her, then asked for a ransom, as needed money. It is obvious he couldn’t keep her alive, unless it was done by an associate. Harvey Levin keeps saying that the ransom note was in perfect grammar and well written and that the person who wrote it was smart.
Remind me again what subject the BIL teaches?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.

Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.

She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.

What is so scary about his appearance?

His beard and name 😵‍💫

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.

]
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.

Savannah has enough sway in the industry and connections to get her cancelled though.

Maybe SG thinks she's on to something.

I highly doubt that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another comment on another board asked if this was a birthday dinner for Nancy as her birthday was 1/27. If it was a birthday dinner, how interesting that none of her friends attended or other family members.

That’s not awfully interesting. 84 is a great age, but not a “milestone” birthday. A dinner at my house is exactly how I expect my own parents would hope to celebrate.

It’s interesting in that if it was planned as a celebration, given her recent birthday, that there were no other guests or witnesses to the dinner. Did she actually make it to the dinner? Was there a dinner?

The uber driver may have picked up a woman, but was it the mother?

They had dinner and played mahjongg. Its not that deep. Don't you do things like this with your family?

We did the exact same thing for my mother in law’s birthday. We had food and cake at my house. No guests, especially since it wasn’t a milestone birthday. This is how most old people celebrate, even ones who have lots of friends. A lot of them don’t want fuss or to make their friends go out.

If your MIL disappeared after that dinner, why steps would you want taken? Walk is thru using what we know about this case. This is what makes this case interesting. Given an everyday activity, what scenario happened?

[Anonymous]

Annie removed most of the photos of her husband from Facebook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.

Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.

She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.

What is so scary about his appearance?

His beard and name 😵‍💫

I actually find him handsome and an Italian accent.. I’d be weak in the knees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.

Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.

She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.

What is so scary about his appearance?

His beard and name 😵‍💫

+1 he looks very sinister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?

For those not familiar:

Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.

Targeted because of Savannah by a gang of foreign criminals. Drugged and immediately taken to Mexico.