Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

I don’t really get the outrage. People post pictures of this type of stuff on their Instagram or Facebook all the time. Is it just that it’s a professional photographer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really get the outrage. People post pictures of this type of stuff on their Instagram or Facebook all the time. Is it just that it’s a professional photographer?

People get dragged on social media all the time for saying or doing something stupid. Meghan and Harry are not beyond reproach. They put it out there for all to see, and people respond accordingly. It would be very simple to avoid all that it they wanted to.

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8931121/JAN-MOIR-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-grave-mistake.html

This article sums up the yuck factor of their personal pap walk at the cemetery.

This underscores what their critics have been saying since Day 1: they don’t want privacy; they want celebrity. Gross.

I normally abhor the Daily Mail but they are spot on. This was a very poor choice on their part. It would have been so much better if donated to a related charity or even when themselves with no photographers.

Wow, I know the Daily Mail comments are full of haters, but this is different level incensed. Jeez, the graveyard stunt is clearly stupid, but hardly evil.

[Anonymous]

I think the transition must be difficult for Harry. He’s sort of like a fish out of water, totally and completely cut off from his former life. I don’t necessarily think it was a PR thing; the day has always been meaningful to him, and he felt the need to honor that in some way, all these miles away.

But he’s not royalty here; we don’t have royalty in the USA, and the gestures and traditions that carried great weight and significance in England have no real meaning or impact here.
All of the gravitas is gone - poof. That has to be hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8931121/JAN-MOIR-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-grave-mistake.html

This article sums up the yuck factor of their personal pap walk at the cemetery.

This underscores what their critics have been saying since Day 1: they don’t want privacy; they want celebrity. Gross.

I normally abhor the Daily Mail but they are spot on. This was a very poor choice on their part. It would have been so much better if donated to a related charity or even when themselves with no photographers.

Wow, I know the Daily Mail comments are full of haters, but this is different level incensed. Jeez, the graveyard stunt is clearly stupid, but hardly evil.

Markle and Harry are trying to ca$h in on on the sacrifice of armed service members. Meghans Mirror shows you where you can buy everything she wore to the cemetery. Yes, it is evil

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the transition must be difficult for Harry. He’s sort of like a fish out of water, totally and completely cut off from his former life. I don’t necessarily think it was a PR thing; the day has always been meaningful to him, and he felt the need to honor that in some way, all these miles away.

But he’s not royalty here; we don’t have royalty in the USA, and the gestures and traditions that carried great weight and significance in England have no real meaning or impact here.
All of the gravitas is gone - poof. That has to be hard.

He needs to honor the dead with a professional photographer documenting everything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it is super cold of the royal family to not lay a wreath for him considering all he has done for the British military and veterans. Who are these 'courtiers' that make these calls? I can't imagine his father or the queen denying him this simple request.

The Royal Family placed wreaths at the Cenotaph on behalf of the various armed services and regiments they (Royals) represent. They weren’t doing this in a personal capacity. Harry doesn’t represent any branch of the armed services, nor does he represent a regiment anymore since he wanted to go out on his own to get rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is super cold of the royal family to not lay a wreath for him considering all he has done for the British military and veterans. Who are these 'courtiers' that make these calls? I can't imagine his father or the queen denying him this simple request.

The Royal Family placed wreaths at the Cenotaph on behalf of the various armed services and regiments they (Royals) represent. They weren’t doing this in a personal capacity. Harry doesn’t represent any branch of the armed services, nor does he represent a regiment anymore since he wanted to go out on his own to get rich.

If Harry had been in the UK I doubt he would have been at the event since he decided he was out, not in. So why should they have put a wreath there in his name? Doesn't make a lot of sense. You have to wonder if he's kicking himself yet for making such a rash move without thinking through all the consequences. He gave up a lot to lead his new life, time will tell if it was the right choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8931121/JAN-MOIR-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-grave-mistake.html

This article sums up the yuck factor of their personal pap walk at the cemetery.

This underscores what their critics have been saying since Day 1: they don’t want privacy; they want celebrity. Gross.

I agree. How could they criticize Meghan's father for paparazzi photos, when they go and do this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8931121/JAN-MOIR-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-grave-mistake.html

This article sums up the yuck factor of their personal pap walk at the cemetery.

This underscores what their critics have been saying since Day 1: they don’t want privacy; they want celebrity. Gross.

I agree. How could they criticize Meghan's father for paparazzi photos, when they go and do this.

Meghan was only mad about that because she didn't get a piece of the action. She thinks she should be the only one to be able to use others to make a name for herself and get rich quick. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really get the outrage. People post pictures of this type of stuff on their Instagram or Facebook all the time. Is it just that it’s a professional photographer?

Odd that Harry is wearing his military medals.

Megan is in a full length coat in Los Angeles. Her entire outfit was listed on Megan’s Mirror/her site/how to buy

They hired a professional photographer to capture their bowing and scraping.

All staged.

Apparently their Archwell site gets about 12 views a day?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is super cold of the royal family to not lay a wreath for him considering all he has done for the British military and veterans. Who are these 'courtiers' that make these calls? I can't imagine his father or the queen denying him this simple request.

The Royal Family placed wreaths at the Cenotaph on behalf of the various armed services and regiments they (Royals) represent. They weren’t doing this in a personal capacity. Harry doesn’t represent any branch of the armed services, nor does he represent a regiment anymore since he wanted to go out on his own to get rich.

If Harry had been in the UK I doubt he would have been at the event since he decided he was out, not in. So why should they have put a wreath there in his name? Doesn't make a lot of sense. You have to wonder if he's kicking himself yet for making such a rash move without thinking through all the consequences. He gave up a lot to lead his new life, time will tell if it was the right choice.

But they had already made the wreath (£1,000 btw) so why not put it down?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the transition must be difficult for Harry. He’s sort of like a fish out of water, totally and completely cut off from his former life. I don’t necessarily think it was a PR thing; the day has always been meaningful to him, and he felt the need to honor that in some way, all these miles away.

But he’s not royalty here; we don’t have royalty in the USA, and the gestures and traditions that carried great weight and significance in England have no real meaning or impact here.
All of the gravitas is gone - poof. That has to be hard.

He needs to honor the dead with a professional photographer documenting everything?

DP. I have a family member who is a Korean War vet that has done something similar for Veterans Day. Does not seem that weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t really get the outrage. People post pictures of this type of stuff on their Instagram or Facebook all the time. Is it just that it’s a professional photographer?

Odd that Harry is wearing his military medals.

Megan is in a full length coat in Los Angeles.

Her entire outfit was listed on Megan’s Mirror/her site/how to buy

They hired a professional photographer to capture their bowing and scraping.

All staged.

Apparently their Archwell site gets about 12 views a day?

This is so gross. There’s no other way to view it. If they wanted to honor fallen soldiers, they could have done so without trying to commercialize it. Then again, they have a huge mortgage to pay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is super cold of the royal family to not lay a wreath for him considering all he has done for the British military and veterans. Who are these 'courtiers' that make these calls? I can't imagine his father or the queen denying him this simple request.

The Royal Family placed wreaths at the Cenotaph on behalf of the various armed services and regiments they (Royals) represent. They weren’t doing this in a personal capacity. Harry doesn’t represent any branch of the armed services, nor does he represent a regiment anymore since he wanted to go out on his own to get rich.

If Harry had been in the UK I doubt he would have been at the event since he decided he was out, not in. So why should they have put a wreath there in his name? Doesn't make a lot of sense. You have to wonder if he's kicking himself yet for making such a rash move without thinking through all the consequences. He gave up a lot to lead his new life, time will tell if it was the right choice.

But they had already made the wreath (£1,000 btw) so why not put it down?

Why make a wreath without confirming that it will be used first? Why not redirect to another use once told no? Other private citizens (which they are in this capacity) can’t just send up a wreath and expect it to be used. It seems pretty manipulative to have one made then start going “oh woe are we, they won’t use our wreath” for something as regulated and symbolic as this event.