2024 Democratic National Convention

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump does have unusual small hands.

SPY magazine always refereed to him as a "short fingered vulgarian."
Quite apt.

Vlad again. He needs to update his dictionary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump does have unusual small hands.

SPY magazine always refereed to him as a "short fingered vulgarian."
Quite apt.

Perfect. 😂😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too bad they don't have younger speakers to headline, you know the future of the party as Obama was seen when he made a speech at the DNC once upon a time.

Maxwell Frost got a prime spot

As did... Harris

59 is not young….

78 is ooooooold

59 is within the prime age range of someone that will likely have had time to gain the necessary experience and qualifications for the POTUS position while still having the physical and mental faculties to handle the demands of this very demanding job. 78 is too old by at least 5 to 10 years. How 155 million people were duped into thinking Trump or Biden was fit for the job in 2020 is a mystery to me. Do better people!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not time things perfectly. In fact, many Americans decided to vote for Trump during the first debate after they realized the media was lying to them about the Presidents health being well and news contrary to that being cheap fakes. Well, apparently it wasn’t a cheap fake

By all appearances it seems everything was timed perfectly.

Go Kamala!

If anything about the 2024 election is "perfect" in your opinion, you are nothing more than a gullible sheep with no recollection of what it was like when we had two functioning major political parties and legitimate POTUS candidates.

There is a process for a candidate to leave the race at any point. It is rarely used but it exists for a reason. Honestly, if the GOP had any game left they would use it now to get a stronger candidate in place before they get badly beaten in November.

"Rarely" used?? Tell me you know nothing about politics without telling me you know nothing about politics. Never, ever before has such an underhanded tactic been used to avert an open primary because until recently we had two functioning political parties with politicians that did actually care more about their country than themselves. We have the god awful choice between Trump and the replacement candidate because we're stupid and gullible. Just because the truth hurts doesn't mean we should deny it.

Settle down, princess. Primaries didn't start being a significant factor in picking Presidential nominees until well after Donald Trump was born.

If not for the traditional primary process, Hillary would have been nominated in 2008. Presumably your knowledge of American politics doesn't predate 2016. Oh, the blind and ignorant do exist.

Not at all responsive to the point that the practice of relying heavily on primaries to choose a nominee is younger than Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here people... KAMALA!

I’m excited for her. I’m going to vote for her. I never watch the conventions. Why would anyone spend their time watching those?

Agree! The RNC and DNC are enemies of the American public. Only a fool couldn't see that. They'll never get a dime of my money and I certainly won't help their TV ratings by tuning in to see a bunch of political speak by bought and paid for politicians. I may vote for Harris but I'm far from gullible enough to buy into "supporting" any candidate funded by the RNC and DNC at this point in time.

Both sides!

Exactly! Let's shut them both down so we can get back to some sense of political normalcy!

spe·cious -
/ˈspēSHəs/
adjective. superficially plausible, but actually wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fat Elvis Trump is gelded. No more Queens edge, no rizz. Just an old laughing stock.

This, after all his haughty lectures about “taking the high road.”

Haughty? I think you misspelled "uppity."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing to see here people... KAMALA!

I’m excited for her. I’m going to vote for her. I never watch the conventions. Why would anyone spend their time watching those?

It's like sports for nerds.

The music was good, and a lot of the state delegates were fun. They were so happy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh look, the "f--- your feelings" crowd is getting verklempt.

Delicious

[Anonymous]

I just assumed he was making fun of Trump's accordion hands. Where did the idea that it was a d1ck joke come from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just assumed he was making fun of Trump's accordion hands. Where did the idea that it was a d1ck joke come from?

Everything is sexual for Republicans. Accordions. Drag queens reading books. Couches.

[Anonymous]

I don’t want to click over to twitter to get the video, but Charlie Kirk tried something at the DNC with a young Democrat and got his butt handed back to him. I’m sure Mr. Smushface thinks he “won” that interaction, but he ended up looking like a genitally obsessed fool.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPeopleTwitter/comments/1exm6xk/he_really_thought_that_this_was_the_internet/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just assumed he was making fun of Trump's accordion hands. Where did the idea that it was a d1ck joke come from?

MAGA minds, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fat Elvis Trump is gelded. No more Queens edge, no rizz. Just an old laughing stock.

This, after all his haughty lectures about “taking the high road.”

Haughty? I think you misspelled "uppity."

Wow, racist much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Michelle Obama: "Who's gonna tell [Trump] that the job he is seeking might be one of those Black jobs?" Excuse me? This racist rhetoric is a huge turn-off. It was apparent since 2008, though, that Michelle -- unlike Barack -- is racist.

It might be a turn-off to a certain kind of person, but to the rest of us she was just making a valid observation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michelle Obama: "Who's gonna tell [Trump] that the job he is seeking might be one of those Black jobs?" Excuse me? This racist rhetoric is a huge turn-off. It was apparent since 2008, though, that Michelle -- unlike Barack -- is racist.

It might be a turn-off to a certain kind of person, but to the rest of us she was just making a valid observation.

I thought it was funny.

-Asian American, who is not gaga over the Obamas like a lot of the Dems seem to be.