Bombshell: Leaked Kremlin docs show 2016 Russian plan to boost "mentally unstable" Trump campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

More fuel for the fire. Wikileaks was another Russian OP that helped Trump. And Julian Assange was not a journalist, but an operative.

Obviously.

I still want to know what Russia has from the RNC’s hacked emails. I’ll say again: my personal guess is that the GOP had figured out a way to switch votes and had been flipping Democratically won elections to Republicans. That’s just my guess though. I know everyone wants it to be something like a dead girl or a live boy but I think they wouldn’t have that on email. Stealing elections though? Yeah, that seems believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, these were leaked by the Kremlin to rile up Trump's supporters and cause domestic chaos in America. They know that Trump's supporters will only become more entrenched in their idiotic positions if confronted with evidence that they were manipulated.

Pride cometh before the fall.

Yep. The MAGAs don't like knowing they've been had and how easy it is to manipulate them. You know Putin is just laughing and enjoying himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, these were leaked by the Kremlin to rile up Trump's supporters and cause domestic chaos in America. They know that Trump's supporters will only become more entrenched in their idiotic positions if confronted with evidence that they were manipulated.

Pride cometh before the fall.

Yep. The MAGAs don't like knowing they've been had and how easy it is to manipulate them. You know Putin is just laughing and enjoying himself.

LOL.
Russian collusion? Steele dossier?
If you want to get into a pissing contest about how easy it is to manipulate people....... Wasn't it the Russians who provided the crap in the dossier? Why, yes it was. And, you folks hammered on about that crap for three years.
Then, there is Juicy Smolette. (and all the Dems posting messages supporting him and stating their outrage) And, the "noose" in the hangar at the race track.
I would say the Dems have been easily manipulated.

I don’t know anything about Juicy and the noose but collusion and the dossier were a combination of verified and unable to verify, not proven wrong. There’s a difference.

[Anonymous]

The New Republic
The New Republic
Breaking News
from Washington and beyond
Most Recent Post
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
Februar

Jim Jordan Spirals When Asked About Losing His Star Biden Witness
House Judiciary Chair
https://newrepublic.com/post/179174/jim-jordan-freaks-out-losing-star-biden-witness-smirnov

But, of course, those facts are untrue. On Tuesday, the Justice Department revealed that Smirnov admitted to prosecutors that “officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved” in developing the Hunter Biden narrative.

According to a new court filing, Smirnov told investigators he was in contact with “four different [top] Russian officials,” two of whom were the “heads of the entities they represent.”

Ultimately, Smirnov’s testimony—and the GOP’s ongoing turmoil to save the impeachment probe against the president—serves as just another staining example of how effectively the Russian government is capable of infiltrating and undermining U.S. elections.

“It targeted the presumptive nominee of one of the two major political parties in the United States. The effects of Smirnov’s false statements and fabricated information continue to be felt to this day,” prosecutors wrote.

On Thursday, special counsel David Weiss announced the indictment of Smirnov on one count of making a false statement and one count of creating a false record, related to what he told the FBI in 2020 about alleged corruption by the Biden family and its connection to Ukrainian-owned Burisma Holdings.

Republicans had spent months building up the hype around Smirnov as a witness, isolating his allegation that Biden had pocketed millions of dollars from the Ukrainian company as the centerpiece of their probe.

On Tuesday, attorneys for the president’s son, Hunter Biden, argued that the “Smirnov allegations infected this case,” and that the special counsel threw out Biden’s plea deal while following Smirnov “down his rabbit hole of lies.”

Meanwhile, legal experts are predicting an unpretty ending for Jordan and other GOP representatives hawking the conspiracy.

“Jim Jordan, Chuck Grassley, and James Comer were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin—or they were in on it,” Tristan Snell, a lawyer and former assistant attorney general for New York state, argued on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. “Either way, DOJ must subpoena every single communication Jordan, Grassley, and Comer had with or about Smirnov and anything related.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

The FBI concluded, among other things, that although consistent with known efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections, much of the material in the Steele election reports, including allegations about Donald Trump and members of the Trump campaign relied upon in the Carter Page FISA applications, could not be corroborated; that certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent with information gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team; and that the limited information that was corroborated related to time, location, and title information, much of which was publicly available.[390][75] (p. 172)
Adam Goldman and Charlie Savage described the dossier as "deeply flawed".[189] They have also described it as a "compendium of rumors and unproven assertions".[192] Ryan Lucas described it as an "explosive dossier of unsubstantiated and salacious material about President Trump's alleged ties with Russia".[6]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier

[Anonymous]

Which allegations in the Steele dossier are true? Which are false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

The FBI concluded, among other things, that although consistent with known efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections, much of the material in the Steele election reports, including allegations about Donald Trump and members of the Trump campaign relied upon in the Carter Page FISA applications, could not be corroborated; that certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent with information gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team; and that the limited information that was corroborated related to time, location, and title information, much of which was publicly available.[390][75] (p. 172)
Adam Goldman and Charlie Savage described the dossier as "deeply flawed".[189] They have also described it as a "compendium of rumors and unproven assertions".[192] Ryan Lucas described it as an "explosive dossier of unsubstantiated and salacious material about President Trump's alleged ties with Russia".[6]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier

Is this the same FBI that just got caught using a Russian to lie about Hunter?

That aside, your info is not accurate and Wiki is never a definitive source.

[Anonymous]

The Mueller Report and the 2020 Senate Intel report have better information than wiki.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report and the 2020 Senate Intel report have better information than wiki.

And they found collusion. Even after Barr put the breaks on Mueller doing anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
[…]
“Jim Jordan, Chuck Grassley, and James Comer were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin—or they were in on it,” Tristan Snell, a lawyer and former assistant attorney general for New York state, argued on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. “Either way, DOJ must subpoena every single communication Jordan, Grassley, and Comer had with or about Smirnov and anything related.”

I think we can say with certainty that at a minimum those three were in on it. Grassley was planning on presiding over 1/6 after Pence had been disposed of, remember?