Bombshell: Leaked Kremlin docs show 2016 Russian plan to boost "mentally unstable" Trump campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This guy shows up in the weirdest of places too!

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/russian-oligarch-keeps-showing-most-inconvenient-places

Funny how BS artist John Solomon doesn’t even mention Deripaska’s ties to Mitch McConnell.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/31/mcconnell-staffers-lobbied-russian-backed-kentucky-project-1442550

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

Agree. They also ignore the GOP authored Senate Intelligence Committee report.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/publications/report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures

The report concluded Russian interference in the 2016 election, and now we are getting more facts around just who was involved, including FBI agents in the NY Office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this whole thread

I sure hope it’s beyond party loyalty, because so far zero Republicans have shown any loyalty to the US over their party identity. Not a single Republican has left the GOP, nor have there been any consequences for any Republican within the party who has worked with Russia.

+1000
This is beyond evil.
CIA noticing its spies were going missing = people were being assassinated. Real breathing people, who thought they were safe, were betrayed and killed.
US Soldiers served up on a platter and families grieving, children orphaned.
And all of Ukraine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

It's the same kind of mental gymnastics they use to pretend that vaccines failure to 100% stop COVID means they can ignore the substantial reduction in COVID transmission and symptoms caused by the vaccines. Completely binary. Either on or off. Anything in the middle of a spectrum can be ignored.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

He said Michael Cohen traveled to Prague. The actual records show Michael Cohen didn't travel to Prague.
Instead there was a different Michael Cohen that traveled to Prague.

Which means rather than a 'source' telling Steele that Michael Cohen went to Prague, what happened was someone looked up Michael Cohen's travel records and gave these to Steele to put in his made up dossier to serve as 'validation' for the dossier. Only this someone messed up and put in the travel info for the wrong gut.
If the validation had come back positive, it would have been in their FISA application. When the FBI agent tasked with 'validating' this detail came back with the info, the FBI just quietly dropped it and ignored this evidence that the entire dossier was an attempt at framing Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

He said Michael Cohen traveled to Prague. The actual records show Michael Cohen didn't travel to Prague.
Instead there was a different Michael Cohen that traveled to Prague.

Which means rather than a 'source' telling Steele that Michael Cohen went to Prague, what happened was someone looked up Michael Cohen's travel records and gave these to Steele to put in his made up dossier to serve as 'validation' for the dossier. Only this someone messed up and put in the travel info for the wrong gut.
If the validation had come back positive, it would have been in their FISA application. When the FBI agent tasked with 'validating' this detail came back with the info, the FBI just quietly dropped it and ignored this evidence that the entire dossier was an attempt at framing Trump.

Oh well okay if an anonymous right winger makes an unsourced claim on the internet, obviously the whole thing is made up and we should totally discredit everything we have seen and read. In fact, we should even disregard the words of Republicans and their notions of who is paid by Russia and how loyalty makes them a family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

He said Michael Cohen traveled to Prague. The actual records show Michael Cohen didn't travel to Prague.
Instead there was a different Michael Cohen that traveled to Prague.

Which means rather than a 'source' telling Steele that Michael Cohen went to Prague, what happened was someone looked up Michael Cohen's travel records and gave these to Steele to put in his made up dossier to serve as 'validation' for the dossier. Only this someone messed up and put in the travel info for the wrong gut.
If the validation had come back positive, it would have been in their FISA application. When the FBI agent tasked with 'validating' this detail came back with the info, the FBI just quietly dropped it and ignored this evidence that the entire dossier was an attempt at framing Trump.

Sorry but that is just one wrong point amid a hundred that were in fact accurate. And, the FBI had plenty to justify the FISA application, well beyond the Dossier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”

Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).

You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?

"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.

He said Michael Cohen traveled to Prague. The actual records show Michael Cohen didn't travel to Prague.
Instead there was a different Michael Cohen that traveled to Prague.

Which means rather than a 'source' telling Steele that Michael Cohen went to Prague, what happened was someone looked up Michael Cohen's travel records and gave these to Steele to put in his made up dossier to serve as 'validation' for the dossier. Only this someone messed up and put in the travel info for the wrong gut.
If the validation had come back positive, it would have been in their FISA application. When the FBI agent tasked with 'validating' this detail came back with the info, the FBI just quietly dropped it and ignored this evidence that the entire dossier was an attempt at framing Trump.

Sorry but that is just one wrong point amid a hundred that were in fact accurate. And, the FBI had plenty to justify the FISA application, well beyond the Dossier.

And now we know that the FBI itself is compromised by Russia. But please, I hope the right wingers keep wringing their hands about the “DiScReDiTeD dOsSiEr.”

[Anonymous]

More on Charles McGonigal today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More on Charles McGonigal today

It would be nice to see consequences, real ones, for the right wingers in the FBI. You know McGonigal isn’t the only one.

[Anonymous]

It was clear from the beginning that Putin would support anyone running against Hillary Clinton, who led State Department efforts to defeat him and call his election "illegitimate." He hated her. (Not saying that his election was legitimate, just that he had beef with her.)

[Anonymous]

More fuel for the fire. Wikileaks was another Russian OP that helped Trump. And Julian Assange was not a journalist, but an operative.