Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:11 pages about this doughy chucklef#ck who is paid by dark money billionaires?

They guy is a sell-out.

If he was a liberal and someone called him that, you’d immediately accuse them of homophobia and anti-Asian hate. But he’s a conservative, so it’s all good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:11 pages about this doughy chucklef#ck who is paid by dark money billionaires?

They guy is a sell-out.

If he was a liberal and someone called him that, you’d immediately accuse them of homophobia and anti-Asian hate. But he’s a conservative, so it’s all good.

There is not a single criticism in this threat that relates to his heritage or orientation. You re the first person to bring up either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:11 pages about this doughy chucklef#ck who is paid by dark money billionaires?

They guy is a sell-out.

If he was a liberal and someone called him that, you’d immediately accuse them of homophobia and anti-Asian hate. But he’s a conservative, so it’s all good.

There is not a single criticism in this threat that relates to his heritage or orientation. You re the first person to bring up either.

I think that was PP's point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of my favorite Antifa videos is when one of them went up close (but out of arm’s reach) to Dan Bongino and shouted “We’re going to rape your wife”. Bongino started towards him saying “what did you say?” And the Antifa guy turned tail and ran towards….wait for it….the police.

So typical. What cowards.

He succeeded in getting under Bongino's skin.

Real men defend their wives.

[Anonymous]

Conservatives have blamed right wing misdeeds on "false flag" operations for years.

And yet when it comes to proven claims, they turn out to be the perpetrators of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You aren't on Twitter. That explains why you are so hopeless CLUELESS about all of this.

Thanks for beautifully illustrating the point!

No, it completely misses the point because the idiot above is defending Andy Ngo pretending there is nothing inflammatory, without seeing all of the inflammatory crap that Andy Ngo posts on Twitter 24/7.

PP is like a blind man saying "I didn't see any crime" - yeah no shit Sherlock. Not a good source of info on what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of my favorite Antifa videos is when one of them went up close (but out of arm’s reach) to Dan Bongino and shouted “We’re going to rape your wife”. Bongino started towards him saying “what did you say?” And the Antifa guy turned tail and ran towards….wait for it….the police.

So typical. What cowards.

He succeeded in getting under Bongino's skin.

Real men defend their wives.

Real men don't let agitators get under their skin. Bongino lacks EQ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives have blamed right wing misdeeds on "false flag" operations for years.

And yet when it comes to proven claims, they turn out to be the perpetrators of them.

Sure, pal.
I can name about a dozen "false flag" hate crimes in the past few years just off the top of my head. Ever heard of Jussie Smolette?
How about the repeated stories of black men painting inflammatory grafitti on black churches?
Or the black student that wrote the racist messages at the Air Force Academy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does he do to instigate violence?

He shows up to document the rioters/anarchists. This infuriates them and they turn their violence on him. Perhaps that’s what the idiot PPs meant. At any rate, it’s telling that not one of them has actually produced a link of Ngo “conspiring” with Proud Boys. Or anyone, for that matter. These loons are riot and antifa apologists.

Yet Andy Ngo has NEVER "documented" his right wing Proud Boys / Patriot Prayer buddies for any of the numerous times that they engaged in violence. And that matters.

Ngo is not a journalist. He is a partisan propagandist.

And YES, PP there IS plenty of evidence of NGO palling around with Proud Boys while Proud Boys were planning violence. https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

“Many on the right rallied around Ngo after that altercation, and spread false rumors that the milkshakes thrown at him and others had contained quick-dry cement. “

At one point, people in the crowd threw eggs and milkshakes at Portland police officers. Some milkshakes that were thrown may have contained “a substance similar to quick-drying cement,” police said. They also asked for people who witnessed violent assaults to email them. Protesters were also seen using bear and pepper spray.

Police said three of the injured people received medical care at area hospitals. Among the people injured over the course of the afternoon was Andy Ngo, the conservative writer who appeared to be attacked by antifa members.

https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2019/06/downtown-portland-protests-involving-antifa-right-wing-demonstrators-escalate-into-civil-disturbance.html

I debunked your crap Salon article straight from the beginning.

Also, Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys are two separate groups. Patriot Prayer and antifa often square off in Oregon, and guess what? Patriot Prayer doesn’t attack Andy Ngo. He covers events they all attend. Patriot Prayer and Andy Ngo can act like human beings and not attack each other in a public space. That doesn’t mean Andy Ngo is a right wing “snitch.” He’s a gay atheist, not exactly right wing material.

Bullshit. You debunked nothing. Andy Ngo hangs out with Proud Boys. That's a fact. He has never reported on their violence, nor Patriot Prayer's violence, even when he's been in the midst of it. His reporting is ENTIRELY one sided, targeting Antifa and making them out to be the only ones engaging in violence when that is absolutely not the case. That's also a fact.

Also, the "concrete milkshake" stories were debunked and disproven yet the right wing kept on pushing the lie to the point of them becoming a full blown meme. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/07/how-a-dubious-claim-of-cement-milkshakes-in-portland-became-a-right-wing-meme/

[...]
[...]
[...]

After the last few years, would it surprise you to find out that there are white supremacists on police forces and they definitely have an agenda they push? I guess that would be news to you. Which is weird because Black people have been telling us that for centuries, and even if you don’t believe Black people, Rage Against the Machine had a tiny hit back in ‘92, the lyrics of which might help you understand why a cop may have lied to further a fascist agenda.

The people posting here are bonkers. There’s absolutely zero evidence the police Lt who observed this incident is a white supremacy advocate, and you are using Rage Against the Machine lyrics as proof?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The right wing has completely normalized lies and deceptions and don't see anything wrong with it. That's why they respond with stupid things like "triggered" when normal people push back on lies.

[Anonymous]

Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

In the opinion of a typical ignorant leftist. Full stop.

This. It's amazing how much they hate him. He's nothing like Project Veritas. He posts unedited clips of people rioting in public places. That's it. That's his big crime.

They hate him because he exposed them and their ways in a NYT best selling book.
He documents their crimes and identifies the law breakers. Of course he attempts to disguise himself. They have attacked him before.

I have never heard of this guy before but the suggestion that he has made his schtick profitable does not really prove anything about his legitimacy as a journalist.

If you've never heard of him, you are unqualified to comment in this thread. Anyone -- anyone -- with any interest in antifa knows exactly who he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.