Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You’ve got a problem or 3, which is the number of posts I’d made. You really should easy up on your emotional, irrational accusations. Not a good look. I’ve never posted whatever got you so bothered, from Twitter or elsewhere, so again, you’re making rather hysterical accusations. Maybe drink a little water unless you’re terrified your DW slipped a little quikrete in there on the sly.

Funny that you assume I’m a man. Why could that be? 🤔

[Anonymous]

Bottom line is, Andy Ngo has repeatedly been exposed as a dishonest propagandist and fraud.

The only way anyone will ever convince me otherwise is to show him doing an "investigative journalism" hit piece against the Proud Boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is, Andy Ngo has repeatedly been exposed as a dishonest propagandist and fraud.

The only way anyone will ever convince me otherwise is to show him doing an "investigative journalism" hit piece against the Proud Boys.

Sure. And we’ll wait on the edge of our seats for someone who regularly covers Proud Boys to do the same with antifa. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You’ve got a problem or 3, which is the number of posts I’d made. You really should easy up on your emotional, irrational accusations. Not a good look. I’ve never posted whatever got you so bothered, from Twitter or elsewhere, so again, you’re making rather hysterical accusations. Maybe drink a little water unless you’re terrified your DW slipped a little quikrete in there on the sly.

Funny that you assume I’m a man. Why could that be? 🤔

Who cares? You’ve made some wild-assed accusations. Your emojis and inanities don’t change that, nor do they substantiate Ngo as an impartial observer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is, Andy Ngo has repeatedly been exposed as a dishonest propagandist and fraud.

The only way anyone will ever convince me otherwise is to show him doing an "investigative journalism" hit piece against the Proud Boys.

Sure. And we’ll wait on the edge of our seats for someone who regularly covers Proud Boys to do the same with antifa. Yawn.

Oh so we're playing "yabut your side?"

Ok...

Do you have an example of someone who made a substantial living and published a book on nothing but "covering Proud Boys?"

I'll wait...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You’ve got a problem or 3, which is the number of posts I’d made. You really should easy up on your emotional, irrational accusations. Not a good look. I’ve never posted whatever got you so bothered, from Twitter or elsewhere, so again, you’re making rather hysterical accusations. Maybe drink a little water unless you’re terrified your DW slipped a little quikrete in there on the sly.

Funny that you assume I’m a man. Why could that be? 🤔

Who cares? You’ve made some wild-assed accusations. Your emojis and inanities don’t change that, nor do they substantiate Ngo as an impartial observer.

If you’re saying widespread media coverage of antifa/anarchists/leftist thugs rioting is somehow “wild-assed accusations,” then the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a full-fledged antifa supporter. Now tell us a something we didn’t know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

"Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left"

Footnote: "The left" in this context is a purely artificial construct, a strawman and bogeyman built up by Andy Ngo and others, which portrays the world as Good and Decent People (like the Proud Boys) and Good Guys with Guns, fighting an existential war against hordes of millions of anarchosocialist zombies who have already burned half of America to the ground and executed half of America's defunded police, and of course CreepyJoe, Nancy Pelosi and others are all in on it because they worship at the altar of BLAMTIFA which is perhaps secretly led by Zombie Hugo Chavez who of course hacked the Dominion Smartmatic servers and stole the election for them.

Okay, maybe half of that satirical footnote was embellishment. But only half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You aren't on Twitter. That explains why you are so hopeless CLUELESS about all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deeply insane thread. People that believe in NGO’s narrative need to be deprogrammed.

“Narrative?” All one has to do is watch coverage of the riots from plenty of other sources to see exactly what’s going on and who is causing criminal mayhem. Curious why you dislike the idea of antifa/anarchist scum being exposed? Apparently you’d prefer these thugs to get away with their crimes. Good to know where you stand.

You’re so dramatic and inflammatory. Really strange behavior.

If all this was at the level of importance and significance you’re trying to give it (more more more posts, eh?), other venues accessible to adults raising families and working full time jobs and thus not hip deep in Twitter all day, would cover it.

That’s hilarious, considering I don’t even have a Twitter account. I leave that to the lunatic liberals who take random tweets and post them here, as if they’re gospel. That’s how I heard about Andy Ngo, in fact - from said lunatic DCUM liberals.

As for “more and more posts,” maybe take a look in the mirror, eh?

You aren't on Twitter. That explains why you are so hopeless CLUELESS about all of this.

Thanks for beautifully illustrating the point!

[Anonymous]

11 pages about this doughy chucklef#ck who is paid by dark money billionaires?

They guy is a sell-out.