Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives have blamed right wing misdeeds on "false flag" operations for years.

And yet when it comes to proven claims, they turn out to be the perpetrators of them.

Sure, pal.
I can name about a dozen "false flag" hate crimes in the past few years just off the top of my head. Ever heard of Jussie Smolette?
How about the repeated stories of black men painting inflammatory grafitti on black churches?
Or the black student that wrote the racist messages at the Air Force Academy?

The right wing used Jussie Smollett to pretend that the remaining thousands of REAL hate crimes were also hoaxes.

And then they pivoted to ONLY highlight when it was blacks attacking Asians to change their narrative to "okay so hate crimes are real but it's blacks doing it."

Andy Ngo has NEVER reported on a hate crime committed by a white person but has repeatedly reported on blacks attacking Asians. Yet the majority of hate crimes are committed by whites.

Pushing a narrative...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

In the opinion of a typical ignorant leftist. Full stop.

This. It's amazing how much they hate him. He's nothing like Project Veritas. He posts unedited clips of people rioting in public places. That's it. That's his big crime.

They hate him because he exposed them and their ways in a NYT best selling book.
He documents their crimes and identifies the law breakers. Of course he attempts to disguise himself. They have attacked him before.

I have never heard of this guy before but the suggestion that he has made his schtick profitable does not really prove anything about his legitimacy as a journalist.

If you've never heard of him, you are unqualified to comment in this thread. Anyone -- anyone -- with any interest in antifa knows exactly who he is.

Yes, he's a lying right wing shill paid by dark money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

Sorry hon, one doesn't need to be a member of antifa to be annoyed with a serial liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing to see the liberals here criticizing Ngo for reporting on antifa.

I can only assume that some who post here are members of this violent group. Not surprised at all.

That’s exactly what I thought about this thread also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.

Like you're any different, obsessively posting to DCUM threads that don't align with your little right wing narratives and worldview?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The right wing has completely normalized lies and deceptions and don't see anything wrong with it. That's why they respond with stupid things like "triggered" when normal people push back on lies.

It's crazy how little self awareness you all have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.

Like you're any different, obsessively posting to DCUM threads that don't align with your little right wing narratives and worldview?

I think you just called yourself a LWNJ. Congratulations on finding out who you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The right wing has completely normalized lies and deceptions and don't see anything wrong with it. That's why they respond with stupid things like "triggered" when normal people push back on lies.

It's crazy how little self awareness you all have.

It's crazy how little awareness the right wing has with regard to the constant lies, gaslighting, and propagandizing they are wrapped in. Some of you do know full well that you're being intellectually dishonest but others here probably actually believe every word they are saying in defense of Ngo. Just like how they believe Project Veritas is truthful and honest "investigative journalism"

[Anonymous]

There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.

Like you're any different, obsessively posting to DCUM threads that don't align with your little right wing narratives and worldview?

I think you just called yourself a LWNJ. Congratulations on finding out who you are.

You do realize that if that's the case you just called yourself an RWNJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

They weren't debunked. You proclaiming something "debunked" just because you don't like it does not make it so.

And Ngo is funded by dark money. Classic tactic to get to #1 through bulk purchases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

They weren't debunked. You proclaiming something "debunked" just because you don't like it does not make it so.

And Ngo is funded by dark money. Classic tactic to get to #1 through bulk purchases.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.

Like you're any different, obsessively posting to DCUM threads that don't align with your little right wing narratives and worldview?

I think you just called yourself a LWNJ. Congratulations on finding out who you are.

You do realize that if that's the case you just called yourself an RWNJ.

Well technically you called me that and I didn't bother to dispute it, because ai already knew that's what you thought of me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

Nope. Andy Ngo is the gaslighter. That's the entire issue here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

+1
Barely a day goes by that I don't scream "bullshit" at his Twitter feed.

You don't have a right to comfort.

LOL sorry dear, he doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm plenty comfortable. It's just the brazen lies and deceptions that are the bullshit and I am completely right to call them out for what they are.

In other words, he triggered you.

What part of brazen lies and deceptions did you miss?

The part where you describe screaming at your phone and you pretrnd like that's normal behavior. But you do you.

Like you're any different, obsessively posting to DCUM threads that don't align with your little right wing narratives and worldview?

I think you just called yourself a LWNJ. Congratulations on finding out who you are.

You do realize that if that's the case you just called yourself an RWNJ.

Well technically you called me that and I didn't bother to dispute it, because ai already knew that's what you thought of me.

Glad you've come to accept what you are.