The numbers are still going up DAILY |
High spread, which we have, is worse than low spread but high hospitalizations. Because when spread is high it’s uncontained and people get sick at large numbers that may not need hospitalization but do cripple other systems. Like.... school. |
The peak is an artificiality of incomplete data. Stay tuned. |
Thanks for discrediting yourself. There is not one UVA model, there are many with different assumptions to show a range of possibilities for decision making. |
| I don't know if it is one person or multiple people saying there is incomplete data- but what is your basis for that statement? VDH asserts that it is publishing data daily. VHHA states it is a daily count of hospitalizations, reported daily from hospitals the night before. deaths are lagging bc they have to be investigated/ etc- but case counts and hospitalizations in Virginia are on a one day lag. What source do you have to suggest otherwise? |
Simple. If someone showed mild symptoms two weeks ago but did not need hospitalization until tomorrow they don't show up on the chart. When they are hospitalized tomorrow, they should appear within a few days. There are lags between infection, symptoms, hospitalization, and death. The gray shading over the incomplete data on the chart shows this. |
ah- I see what you are saying, I had understood your comment differently. You are assuming that there are more hospitalizations coming, based on high numbers of infections. You may well be right- although I would think we would be seeing it now. Infections have been pretty level for the last week- granted it still way to high a number, but we have stopped the exponential growth. |
Yeah but now they have a new argument - open up anyways despite high levels. |
I have no idea. Yeah, some have kids in APS but a surprising number of them don't. |
Yes, because now what's the point of keeping schools closed? Maybe it worked for a while, maybe it didn't. But now, keeping schools closed isn't helping and is only hurting students. |
There's no way they're going to pull them out of their Catholic/private in January IF APS actually opens. They will keep them in their private and see how the opening goes for the poor suckers still in public (us). If it's not safe, oh well, it wasn't their kids! |
I am in that group I can think of a handful of people who have their child in private this year And I have noticed in recent weeks a trend in AEM with more people supporting opening If kids don’t get back now , the curriculum will be dumbed down in years to come in high farms rate elementary schools which will definitely fuel flight to private school |
| Elementary opening makes sense in Jan or Feb. at least early elementary. It’s insisting that all grade levels K-12 reopen that drives me nuts. Safety considerations are not the same. |
Those kids aren’t coming back for hybrid, so stop using them for your own purposes. |
| It is true. As a group, EL and low income families chose DL at higher rates. This overlaps with the groups that are showing the greatest achievement gap at least based on the elementary and middle school data APS has shared so far. So, the focus is going to have to remain on effective distance learning even when hybrid eventually opens. Speciifically, the middle and high school teachers using this concurrent model will have to focus their efforts on the kids at home to get the achievement gap under control. This ain’t going away when school reopens in the Frankenstein concurrent model. . Hybrid instruction at middle and high will have to be tailored to the distance learners. |