QANON/MAGA rally in Lansing, MI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

Didn't they stay in their cars or wear masks?

Are you being ironic, or willfully ignorant?
Look at the pictures and you can find your answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

Didn't they stay in their cars or wear masks?

NO!!!

Many people got out of their cars and rallied on the steps of the Capitol. 90% of the cars had their windows open, people were yelling, walking through stopped traffic, and giving each other high fives. Based on the photos and videos I saw, the vast majority were not wearing masks. There were tons of children without masks.

It was a parade of idiot adults acting like petulant children. Go see the hashtag #OperationGridlock on Twitter and Instagram - you'll see crowds without masks all over the Capitol grounds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocked, SHOCKED to find astroturfing in this establishment.

Whitnmer should go after the conservative elite who are funding and promoting this lawlessness. Exercise the power of her office.

LOLLL, this picture looks like a commercial for COPD. Most of the people would definitely fall into the high risk category if they caught COVID.

[Anonymous]

I found their rallying flag:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I found their rallying flag:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

Very well-said!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I found their rallying flag:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

Trump has no Constitutional authority or ability to do either of the things you suggest. #StrawmanArgument

Yes, people can sit home for a couple weeks. The federal government needs to pay them to stay home, lest they infect their communities. 2% mortality is nearly 7 million of your fellow Americans needlessly dying.

How did you end up so damaged to view life so cheaply?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

When the civil disobedience may prolong the very thing being protested, it deserves to be maligned.

+1

Stay home. And don’t block ambulances FFS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read about the protests. 97% of cases are in Detroit and the immediate 3 metro Detroit counties. If you look at the rest of the state, most counties have less than 100 cases with many counties in the single digits. Detroit hospitals are a dumpster fire to be sure- but to be honest, you wouldn't want to be a patient there on a good day pre-covid. The rest of Michigan isn't like this. I have family in Michigan, several in healthcare (Drs and nurses) in larger cities, but not Detroit. They have said their hospitals are empty. Drs are sitting home because OR is closed, nurses are either laid off or (in the care of UofM) in union and still going to work but with 1/8 the patients they would normally have.

I'm not saying the Governor is wrong, but Michigan does have super strict, possibly the strictest, stipulations to the state wide stay at home order. I think total lock down in Detroit and maybe something slightly modified for the rest of the state could have been equally effective without being so dramatic to all the business over areas that are not showing spread.

This is flat out wrong.

Ohio, Kansas, Montana, West Virginia, New Mexico, Alaska, Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maine and Maryland have MORE RESTRICTIVE lockdown orders than Michigan, per the WSJ.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-state-by-state-guide-to-coronavirus-lockdowns-11584749351

So, I must ask: what gave you the impression that Michigan was the strictest? It sounds like you were ignorantly swayed by propaganda. I wonder why?

Actually I was paraphrasing this article that from NPR that states it has one of the most stringent stay at home orders. Wow. You must love being a bigot

https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/04/15/835250693/michigan-stay-at-home-order-prompts-honking-traffic-jam-protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

Very well-said!!

A few things:

1. Part of the problem is most people don't trust Donald Trump to make decisions for the benefit of Americans instead of for his own vain gain. So if he issued an order of course we'd question and dissent. That's why he should have tried hard to build trust through, I don't know, telling the truth and acting in our interest during his first three years in office. He'd have more political capital now.

2. I agree there is a tension between freedom and safety with these stay at home orders that is very hard to navigate. Again, communities with trust are more receptive to these orders, and I feel ilke - to beat a dead horse - that's why it's so important to have leaders who act in our interest (and believe in science and sht like that).

3. It's real hard to know how the first amendment is going to bump up against social distancing requirements. We'll see some interesting litigation, I imagine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

Cool story, bro. You comrades are responsible for this - preventing a nurse from getting to the hospital:

You lose the right to crow about "freedom" and "natural rights" when your actions lead to the deaths of your fellow Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocked, SHOCKED to find astroturfing in this establishment.

Whitnmer should go after the conservative elite who are funding and promoting this lawlessness. Exercise the power of her office.

LOLLL, this picture looks like a commercial for COPD. Most of the people would definitely fall into the high risk category if they caught COVID.

And naturally, the gun nuts have to be there. Gotta have that rifle in case of trouble!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s it at all surprising that so many of you will go out of your way to defend nonviolent civil disobedience unless it doesn’t meet your purpose.
You people are hypocrites.

Those morons just infected each other and will pass it on to MeeMa in their rural towns. They literally just spread the virus all over the state because they don't know how to practice self-discipline.

If they act like spoiled children, they should get the belt.

If Donald Trump instituted a nationwide ban on public assembly and protests until there were ZERO coronavirus deaths would you be okay with that? What if he bans voting this November because coronavirus will still be around?

Tyranny is always brought on and accepted by myopic dolts like you because of national emergencies. It’s the same reason Muslims were stripped naked, tortured and treated like dogs in Abu Ghraib after 9/11. Shame on people like you for criticizing people for exercising their First Amendment freedoms. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights don’t have stipulations that they should be suspended for a virus with a .5% to 2% mortality rate.

Imagine what kind of dystopian police state you all would accept for a virus with a 25% mortality rate. Events like these really make you realize how fragile our democracy and freedoms actually are.

Very well-said!!

I totally agree!