They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans so clueless about whistleblowers? If I work at a hospital and see evidence of massive Medicare fraud and turn it in as a whistleblower, once the authorities decide to investigate I am no longer relevant. The evidence is all that matters.

Bingo! Key word is you have to actually SEE evidence.
Thank you.

Some of the evidence was first hand, just not all of it. And like a dozen other witnesses AND THE PRESIDENT have confirmed facts in the whistleblower’s report. You guys are really losing the plot here. Good luck to you.

[Anonymous]

Exactly what “evidence” was firsthand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly what “evidence” was firsthand?

Enough that two different Trump appointees referred the complaint to DOJ. Give it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly what “evidence” was firsthand?

Hi, you’re like six weeks behind. Maybe read this thread?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/830293.page

[Anonymous]

Just another hoax falling flat on its face.
Next!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just another hoax falling flat on its face.
Next!

Next after the whistleblower? Yeah, there’s a long line.

[Anonymous]

You have to actually have firsthand evidence
to be a real whistleblower.

[Anonymous]

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/29/former-trump-aide-who-now-works-for-devin-nunes-reportedly-leaked-ukraine-whistleblowers-name/

Nunes aid.

Should be prosecuted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just another hoax falling flat on its face.
Next!

How is this a hoax?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You have to actually have firsthand evidence
to be a real whistleblower.

Under whose definition”? Because two different Trump appointees investigated it and found the report urgent and credible. Run along now.

[Anonymous]

Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???

You said that already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???

This spaghetti isn’t sticking. Quick, try something else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???

Good, so there's no need to out him or make his life miserable.

Good thing so many people are coming forward now to share their firsthand knowledge of Trump's abuse of office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You have to actually have firsthand evidence
to be a real whistleblower.

Not according to the DoD IG.