They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

[Anonymous]

Who is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

What's more fishy is why the NSC attorney and the DOJ illegally ignored the file complaints. Why?

[Anonymous]

This NPR piece has the whistleblower report and exactly what in it has been corroborated and by what/how.
https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/776173492/the-whistleblower-complaint-has-largely-been-corroborated-heres-how?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

[Anonymous]

Trump supporters wrongly identified ex-Obama staffer as the Ukraine whistleblower — resulting in death threats.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumpkins-thought-this-man-was-the-whistleblower-they-were-wrong?ref=scroll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This NPR piece has the whistleblower report and exactly what in it has been corroborated and by what/how.
https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/776173492/the-whistleblower-complaint-has-largely-been-corroborated-heres-how?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

This was really useful; thanks for posting it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

*******************


In July, Fiona Hill went to Eisenberg on Bolton's orders after the meeting with Ukrainians in the WH:

Hill testified that when she recounted the conversation with Sondland to Bolton, he told her to report it to NSC counsel John Eisenberg immediately, saying, "and he told me, and this is a direct quote from Ambassador Bolton: You go and tell Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this, and you go and tell him what you've heard and what I've said."

https://www.businessinsider.com/fiona-hill-testimony-details-stunning-meeting-john-bolton-stormed-out-2019-11

Lt Col Vindman went to Eisenberg after the phone call:

National Security Council’s director for Ukraine, told lawmakers that he went to the lawyer, John Eisenberg, to register his concerns about the call, in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, according to a person in the room for Vindman’s deposition on Tuesday.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a decorated Army officer who served as the National Security Council’s director for Ukraine, told lawmakers that he went to the lawyer, John Eisenberg, to register his concerns about the call, in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, according to a person in the room for Vindman’s deposition on Tuesday.

Eisenberg recorded Vindman’s complaints in notes on a yellow legal pad, then conferred with his deputy Michael Ellis about how to handle the conversation because it was clearly “sensitive,” Vindman testified. The lawyers then decided to move the record of the call into the NSC’s top-secret codeword system—a server normally used to store highly classified material that only a small group of officials can access.

Vindman did not consider the move itself as evidence of a cover-up, according to a person familiar with his testimony. But he said he became disturbed when, a few days later, Eisenberg instructed him not to tell anyone about the call—especially because it was Vindman’s job to coordinate the interagency process with regard to Ukraine policy.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/01/white-house-vindman-ukraine-call-063892

The whistleblower went to the CIA lawyer first and when she passed along the concerns about the phone call to Eisenberg and made a criminal referral to DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/cia-s-top-lawyer-made-criminal-referral-whistleblower-s-complaint-n1062481

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s to hide?

Trump has a lot to hide. He is similar to a mob boss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

The CIA IG and the Intel Community IG. Have you been following this at all?

[Anonymous]

Again, where are those reports?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

The CIA IG and the Intel Community IG. Have you been following this at all?

The CIA Inspector General didn't have first hand knowledge, though, did she?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

The CIA IG and the Intel Community IG. Have you been following this at all?

The CIA Inspector General didn't have first hand knowledge, though, did she?

The CIA IG wasn't acting as a whistleblower, she was acting as an IG. Obviously.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/cia-s-top-lawyer-made-criminal-referral-whistleblower-s-complaint-n1062481[url]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

The CIA IG and the Intel Community IG. Have you been following this at all?

The CIA Inspector General didn't have first hand knowledge, though, did she?

The CIA IG wasn't acting as a whistleblower, she was acting as an IG. Obviously.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/cia-s-top-lawyer-made-criminal-referral-whistleblower-s-complaint-n1062481[url]

Yep. People, if you are deeply ignorant about how this works, educate yourself before forming an opinion. Otherwise you just sound like an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fishy how those employees with DIRECT knowledge of perceived wrongdoing failed to blow their whistle. Why?

Actually they tried and their reports were squashed by the NSC counsel and the DOJ.

1. Who exactly tried?
2. Let’s see those supposed reports.

The CIA IG and the Intel Community IG. Have you been following this at all?

The CIA Inspector General didn't have first hand knowledge, though, did she?

The CIA IG wasn't acting as a whistleblower, she was acting as an IG. Obviously.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/cia-s-top-lawyer-made-criminal-referral-whistleblower-s-complaint-n1062481[url]

Yep. People, if you are deeply ignorant about how this works, educate yourself before forming an opinion. Otherwise you just sound like an idiot.

Woah, no need to be rude.

Reread the above nested posts.

In response to a question about why people with first hand information didn't "blow their whistle", the answer was that they tried to but the reports were squashed.

As you note, the CIA IG did not have first hand knowledge; she was responding and reporting in her role as IG.

I'm asking someone to follow up to the original comment -- did someone with firsthand knowledge file a report that was subsequently squashed?