They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

[Anonymous]

Is he protected? How do we protect him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And yet, none of it changes the absolute corruption of this administration or any of the testimony given to date.

It is clear the defense is going to be "so what"

It's personal. A narcissist has to avenge the perceived wrong done to him. This is about revenge.

So petty and immature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Once again - there is nothing in the whistleblower protection act that demands anonymity for the whistleblower.

In fact, if the House votes to impeach, I am certain he will be subpoenaed by the Senate.

Why? If he has no 1st-have information, why should he be a witness? The only possible reason is to harm him and instill fear in others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters: Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings? Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?

He's pretty much the equivalent, if they've correctly identified the whistleblower.

They haven't figured out how he induced all these people to give their testimonies, but they'll think something up. Or maybe they'll just sail past that and go straight to Dem operative OMG!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again - there is nothing in the whistleblower protection act that demands anonymity for the whistleblower.

In fact, if the House votes to impeach, I am certain he will be subpoenaed by the Senate.

The whistleblower only? Not Taylor, Vindman, Sondland, Hill, Morrison? No one else?

Oh, I am betting the whole lot of them will be subpoenaed. And, anyone the whistleblower spoke too.

And, BTW - it wasn't tough to figure out his identity after the details published by the NYTimes a few weeks ago.
I saw his name floated over a week ago.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again - there is nothing in the whistleblower protection act that demands anonymity for the whistleblower.

In fact, if the House votes to impeach, I am certain he will be subpoenaed by the Senate.

The whistleblower only? Not Taylor, Vindman, Sondland, Hill, Morrison? No one else?

Oh, I am betting the whole lot of them will be subpoenaed. And, anyone the whistleblower spoke too.

And, BTW - it wasn't tough to figure out his identity after the details published by the NYTimes a few weeks ago.
I saw his name floated over a week ago.

Well of course his identity could have been deduced. But why?

Grasping at straws, that's why.

[Anonymous]

I am sickened by this. Deep Throat was not exposed. Why are the Republicans surrounding Trump? These are NOT their ideals. What does he hold over them? This is not the America I Know (Grandad WW2 vet—Normandy/Republican; Dad, Vietnam Vet—Repub)! I am sickened by this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters: Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings? Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?

Evidently, he was "released" (fired) from a previous govt. job for leaking.
His Trump Hate definitely colored his perception of the phone call. And, considering he didn't even listen to it, one has to wonder if this was an organized effort, and if so, were any in Congress involved?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am sickened by this. Deep Throat was not exposed. Why are the Republicans surrounding Trump? These are NOT their ideals. What does he hold over them? This is not the America I Know (Grandad WW2 vet—Normandy/Republican; Dad, Vietnam Vet—Repub)! I am sickened by this.

Most of these RWNJs aren't Republicans. They're just nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Young 33 yr old prep student / Yale. How can we protect him?? I can’t believe the Repubs and Trump. What can we do?

Some anonymous person is not going to overturn a legitimate presidential election. I can assure you of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters: Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings? Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?

Evidently, he was "released" (fired) from a previous govt. job for leaking.
His Trump Hate definitely colored his perception of the phone call. And, considering he didn't even listen to it, one has to wonder if this was an organized effort, and if so, were any in Congress involved?

Apparently he colored Vindman's perception of the phone call. Both Vindmans.

Mind control? Maybe he's a Jedi?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am sickened by this. Deep Throat was not exposed. Why are the Republicans surrounding Trump? These are NOT their ideals. What does he hold over them? This is not the America I Know (Grandad WW2 vet—Normandy/Republican; Dad, Vietnam Vet—Repub)! I am sickened by this.

The NYTimes did not publish details about Deep Throat's identity.
And, Adam Schiff wasn't in office to leak to the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters: Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings? Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?

Evidently, he was "released" (fired) from a previous govt. job for leaking.
His Trump Hate definitely colored his perception of the phone call. And, considering he didn't even listen to it, one has to wonder if this was an organized effort, and if so, were any in Congress involved?

Ok intern. You can hate the Pres and still do your job. But when you hear treason, you choose country over party. As many heroic Germans did during WW2. Spoke out or worked against Hitler. Trump is on his own mission. Not American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters: Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings? Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?

Evidently, he was "released" (fired) from a previous govt. job for leaking.
His Trump Hate definitely colored his perception of the phone call. And, considering he didn't even listen to it, one has to wonder if this was an organized effort, and if so, were any in Congress involved?

Apparently he colored Vindman's perception of the phone call. Both Vindmans.

Mind control? Maybe he's a Jedi?

I think we will eventually find that Vindman went to this person. Vindman gave him the details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Young 33 yr old prep student / Yale. How can we protect him?? I can’t believe the Repubs and Trump. What can we do?

Some anonymous person is not going to overturn a legitimate presidential election. I can assure you of that.

Have you been under a rock for the past month? There’s a lot more that’s been going on than just one anonymous person. And impeachment doesn’t overturn the election. You voted for Pence also.