Do you think there is an inside royal leaking bad press about Duchess Meghan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Eugenie suddenly in the press? She is just prince Williams cousin, nothing more. He has several cousins, from his mother's side as wet

Eugenie is the one that had the extravagant August wedding modeled after Meghan's that no one showed up to.

If you meant Beatrice - she's dating a man she snatched out from under the fiance who lived with him and their newborn.

Let them fade into anonymity.
There is only room for one Royal family. Not an entire extended family, clan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

But see, you just proved my point. There is no need to criticize Kate in the process of applauding Meghan. MM fans made it some kind of contest between them -- MM is SO much better than Kate, etc. Waity Kaity, blah blah blah. MM is really going to shake up the monarchy, etc. Tearing down Kate in the process of applauding MM is so childish and petty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't have a problem with Meghan's spending on clothes just like I don't have a problem with Kate's spending. Meghan has a long history of keeping her nice clothes and shoes in good shape and wearing them over many years. I believe that will continue with her royal wardrobe. She's also being deliberate, it appears, to wear more pared-down, modern jewelry than Kate - with more high street brands in the mix. Just like Kate is more spare on her purses than Meghan. That's fine, they have different tastes.

On a side note - One of the reasons I don't credit the tiara tantrum story is that is so opposite of Meghan's jewelry aesthetic and with a large emerald tiara (I don't mean Eugenie's but one that was known about like the Vladimir tiara). Meghan would have had to have done a lot of research to have known about and requested the Greville Emerald Kokoshnik from the Queen.

I think MM wanted the tiara/crown that Eugenie wore (it would fit with her dress and style) but the Queen said no bc Eugenie was already given it for her wedding. The rest was planted or made up about it being the Greville one so it didn't sound like the Queen was playing favorites or giving MM prefernce over her own bloodline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

But see, you just proved my point. There is no need to criticize Kate in the process of applauding Meghan. MM fans made it some kind of contest between them -- MM is SO much better than Kate, etc. Waity Kaity, blah blah blah. MM is really going to shake up the monarchy, etc. Tearing down Kate in the process of applauding MM is so childish and petty.

DP. I understand your point, and undoubtedly some of this is happening. But the work-shy, "Will-not and "Cat-not" or Duchess Dolittle preceded Meghan. It's actually subsided since Meghan is now the new target of the British red tops. What I don't think is the case is that the Meghan fans are lauding her for the same thing they criticize Kate for, but the reverse is pretty prevalent on these threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

But see, you just proved my point. There is no need to criticize Kate in the process of applauding Meghan. MM fans made it some kind of contest between them -- MM is SO much better than Kate, etc. Waity Kaity, blah blah blah. MM is really going to shake up the monarchy, etc. Tearing down Kate in the process of applauding MM is so childish and petty.

But all those things are true. Though I wouldn't quite put it as 'better', just more competent. And quite frankly - after waiting seven years for Kate to do even a quarter of what Meghan has done in six months of marriage, I'm enjoying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

But see, you just proved my point. There is no need to criticize Kate in the process of applauding Meghan. MM fans made it some kind of contest between them -- MM is SO much better than Kate, etc. Waity Kaity, blah blah blah. MM is really going to shake up the monarchy, etc. Tearing down Kate in the process of applauding MM is so childish and petty.

But all those things are true. Though I wouldn't quite put it as 'better', just more competent. And quite frankly - after waiting seven years for Kate to do even a quarter of what Meghan has done in six months of marriage, I'm enjoying it.

Kate and Meghan are different people. You seem really immature to have to drag Kate into every discussion about Meghan -- just like the stinking tabloids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whoever posted the white maternity dress must not have seen the later pix. It was riding up and folding on itself, even above the chest. She looks a mess, especially her hair, although it looks OK when she pulls it back tightly, with no "tendrils."

I know. I felt so bad for her. She obviously was affected by all the bad press about how much her clothes are that she decided to just go cheap. And I mean really cheap! (I mean going from something in the thousands to a $20 dress? she could have gotten something for a $100 or a few hundred) and it just didn't look good at all. I like MM, and just felt bad for her - like she just can't win for losing.

[Anonymous]

Loving this cutesy profile of the adorably in-love couple - All the times Prince Harry treated pregnant Meghan Markle like a queen that she is

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/gallery/2019011766723/prince-harry-treats-pregnant-meghan-markle-like-a-queen-pictures/1/

Skip to 3:44 for the cutest moment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

*rolls eyes*

I wonder why that is. One is getting things done and the other is still 'exploring interests'.

But see, you just proved my point. There is no need to criticize Kate in the process of applauding Meghan. MM fans made it some kind of contest between them -- MM is SO much better than Kate, etc. Waity Kaity, blah blah blah. MM is really going to shake up the monarchy, etc. Tearing down Kate in the process of applauding MM is so childish and petty.

But all those things are true. Though I wouldn't quite put it as 'better', just more competent. And quite frankly - after waiting seven years for Kate to do even a quarter of what Meghan has done in six months of marriage, I'm enjoying it.

DP. Those things aren't true. MM isn't better or worse than Kate and, whatever she does or doesn't do, isn't going to shake up the monarchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

Bosh! Diana was just as pilloried for her clothing expenses early in her marriage. People seem to forget that tabloids run on creating drama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

Bosh! Diana was just as pilloried for her clothing expenses early in her marriage. People seem to forget that tabloids run on creating drama.

DP. I'm not sure why you think comparing MM to Diana does MM any favors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

DCUM thought Kate was lazy long before MM met Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

Bosh! Diana was just as pilloried for her clothing expenses early in her marriage. People seem to forget that tabloids run on creating drama.

DP. I'm not sure why you think comparing MM to Diana does MM any favors.

I'm not sure why you think MM cares what you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

DCUM thought Kate was lazy long before MM met Harry.

Not DCUM - just crazy Kate-hater with all her charts.