Do you think there is an inside royal leaking bad press about Duchess Meghan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

I have no idea. How is the Princess Royal (Anne?) representing Britain like a choice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

I have no idea. How is the Princess Royal (Anne?) representing Britain like a choice?

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/culture-news/amp25668869/royal-family-busiest-princess-anne/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Anne isn't there to negotiate trade deals. What are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

The British royals are figureheads and are not negotiating trade deals, fyi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

I have no idea. How is the Princess Royal (Anne?) representing Britain like a choice?

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/culture-news/amp25668869/royal-family-busiest-princess-anne/

Methinks PP was talking about Meghan, spending money. Not Anne.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Anne isn't there to negotiate trade deals. What are you talking about?

It was an example chill. You want to cut the working royals to 60% toddlers but don’t realize just how many engagements all the Queen’s children take on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Anne isn't there to negotiate trade deals. What are you talking about?

It was an example chill. You want to cut the working royals to 60% toddlers but don’t realize just how many engagements all the Queen’s children take on.

You have no idea what the Royal family does. Someone (you?) brought up a problem of expenses and Kate having too many people employed. I proposed a solution. Do you have a better one?

[Anonymous]

I still like Meghan...

I don’t mind Kate either, really loved her wedding dresss.

[Anonymous]

I think it is really funny that dcums self appointed royal expert thinks Princess Anne is negotiating trade deals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Like a champ. HAHAHA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Anne isn't there to negotiate trade deals. What are you talking about?

It was an example chill. You want to cut the working royals to 60% toddlers but don’t realize just how many engagements all the Queen’s children take on.

You have no idea what the Royal family does. Someone (you?) brought up a problem of expenses and Kate having too many people employed. I proposed a solution. Do you have a better one?

Umm no one said there were too many expenses for Kate?? Someone said she had a large staff - large enough that everything is taken care of - and someone else said she didn’t. That’s it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it is really funny that dcums self appointed royal expert thinks Princess Anne is negotiating trade deals

+1. If we are judging royals on their personal lives, whew! Anne got around in her day. She dated Camilla's husband while he was engaged to Camilla.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.



https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile

Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes.

What does Kate spending money and doing nothing have to do with the Princess Royal spending money and respresenting Britain like a champ?

Anne isn't there to negotiate trade deals. What are you talking about?

I’m talking about Kate not working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The permanent makeup industry "
Hehehe

They don't like to admit Kate has tats because hers are so badly done.

Heehee. All permanent makeup is bad. Kate's is just the same as the rest.

Well, I certainly agree with you there. It's tacky.