|
Actually there are - Kate has: - Two housekeepers (for Anmer Hall) - One personal dresser - One hairdresser - One private secretary - One housekeeper (Kensington Palace) - One nanny - Two private schoolteachers (for George and Charlotte) - One gardener (for Anmer Hall) - Private security of 6+ (One for each of the children and two for the adults) - Two drivers https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11865390 In other words it makes it very easy to do 'tasks' when her children are mostly in care all day, someone else is cooking and cleaning for her as well doing the laundry, she doesn't drive herself, and she doesn't even have to prepare her own outfits. Which begs the question - what does she do all day? |
If you think managing that is easy, you're nuts. And since you seem to think that's easy... |
| They do their own cooking. |
LOL if you think Kate is 'managing' that staff I have a bridge to sell you. She lives within the royal household and specifically Kensington palace. Those are just her personal staff, but the greater staff of Kensington is 6x as large. The household manager oversees all of that including payroll, compensation, leave, schedules, hiring, and access. So please. |
They used to do their own cooking. When she and William lived in Anglesley just two of them. Now the housekeeper is expected to cook as well as clean while Kate takes on occasional 'fun' projects like cookie day with Charlotte. BTW I'm sure Meghan will be having a cook/chef taking care of the food as soon as her kids are born as well. |
I know right? Staff members don't call in sick directly to William. Doubt that Camilla personally conducts annual reviews. Their lives are more like a modern Downton Abbey except the Crawley family wasn't nearly as high up in the royal food chain, so their lives are really more like a modern Downton Abbey on steroids. |
Enjoys her life while you keep foaming at the mouth about it?
|
They don't like to admit Kate has tats because hers are so badly done. |
I think the real question is why keep all the dead weight around if we're so worried about costs (which we're not of course, unless we're talking about Kate). The obvious solution is to trim the fat and only support the line of succession 5 deep. So, time for Anne, Andrew, Edward, Harry and all the spouses to make their own way. Why spend $500K on the 6th in lines wife's wardrobe? Or pay for their multi-million dollar renovation of Frogmore Cottage? But, as I recall, a few days ago the same people complaining about Kate's staff didn't seem too bothered with any of that because Meghan needed to build a wardrobe and we're not tax payers anyway. But I guess today we care about how other countries spend their money. |
Heehee. All permanent makeup is bad. Kate's is just the same as the rest. |
The problem with trimming the fat is it’s the monarchs prerogative. The Queen isn’t kicking any of her children to the curb. Charles will get rid of his siblings and peripherals though. BTW Queen Elizabeth’s four is nothing compared to Victoria’s nine if you want to talk expenditures. |
Also the line of succession five deep is Charles, William and three toddlers who can’t work for another 15-18 years so umm I don’t know if you want to send George to Chile for trade negotiations just yet but you’re welcome to try.
https://www.google.com/amp/t13.cl/amp/noticia/nacional/video-y-fotos-imagenes-ha-dejado-visita-princesa-ana-inglaterra-chile |
Andrew will go nuts when this happens, I assume. |
Then quit yer bitchin' about how the money is spent, assuming you're the one demanding to know how one spends here time, because Kate isn't going anywhere. I'd much rather someone like Kate employ a bunch of people than for a wife of #6 to frivolously spend money on ugly ill fitting clothes. |