| This is OP. Thanks so much for all the replies. I think the simple answer at this point is that the couple probably doesn't care particularly if the kids are in the wedding -- it's nice for the pics but that's it. And that's fine. A little strange given that this BIL really does love my kids (and they adore him), but his fiancee has only met them maybe four times total and they have a right to make their own decision. But I'm not sure it makes sense to spend all this money to bring the kids. We can walk that back easily without offending anyone. We can also just go forward as planned, and my kids will be disappointed, but will obviously live. I will not send my DH alone to the reception, and I will not make a huge stink about anything. Not worth it, and my DH needs my support this year (MIL passed in the last year). So, we'll look into the possibility of a babysitter at home for three nights, and then weigh our options. |
| I hope it works out OP. |
| I KNEW this wasn’t a case of “but the bridezilla NEEDS her cute little prop children!!!!” I just knew it! |
I guess we didn't have a wedding then since we didn't do all of that. Half the bridal party barely made it to the rehearsal between work and family stuff. |
This is the answer. Not having them at the reception is beyond rude if they're in the wedding. |
I do too. I'm of the mind that not inviting the bridal party is crappy but I also get that the bride doesn't really know the kids and is including them to be nice. That said, they're KIDS. And they're in the wedding so it's not like 2nd cousin Susie from Arkansas can make a big fuss that her kids can't come - bridal party only! If you pull the kids now, it becomes a big issue, so I'd have DH have one more conversation with his brother and just be like "hey, the girls are excited about everything - it's really bumming them out to come all this way and then not come to the 'big party' - can we compromise?" |
I don't get the all weddings stuff in bold. Rehearsal dinner the day before should be for people in the wedding, parents, maybe sibs if they are in town. Not every relative on the planet. If people can drive or 1-3 hours for a Saturday wedding why go the day before? Mandatory feed at a brunch on Sunday? Hello? Guests that fly would have to pay 2-4 times more to fly out mid afternoon or a Sunday evening. Prices go up because people need to get back to home base for work on Monday. |
| Rude, I've been to several "no children" weddings where family members and wedding party is still invited, the "no children" rule was only applied to all the other guests. |
You are crazy. What BIL is doing is beyond rude. |
| I hope your brother-in-law just removes her kids out of the wedding party. |
+1. |
Um no. All weddings don't have all this stuff. In fact, I've been to many weddings and been in many bridal parties and I've never been to one that included all the events you list. My own wedding we had a rehearsal and rehearsal dinner (paid for by grooms family) the night before, then the actual wedding. No dinner two nights before, no brunch the day after. |
I think the use of "All" is the problem. What the PP describes is traditional in many areas of the country but not all. I used to think of that scenario as a "Southern" wedding, but I think some of it has spread elsewhere. There are many variations and budgets. |