Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Why would he talk about the Rothschilds? The only context in which that name is invoked is anti-Semitic in nature. What other reason would there be? There are websites, videos and organizations devoted to promoting the Rothschilds conspiracy theory—. And it has to do with Jews. That is it. He knew this had to do with Jews. Sadly, this is what people discuss behind closed doors with their families and friends. If he made a reference to Rothschilds it is because he knew it had to do with being Jewish. Now I know how African Americans feel when people tell them they are imagining racism. It is really amazing to me that people have to be convinced that this is truly anti-Semitism. The guy has said other anti-Semitic things in the past. This is not a one off. He is an anti-Semite and should be forced to resign. Period. Stop making excuses for this creep. People need to take this stuff seriously. |
+ 100 We need strong words about this from our mayor and from the rest of the council. Half-assed apologies don't erase this. Hate and ignorance should never get a pass. When we criticize Trump, they are going to say "Look at DC...." |
Yes, agree. I cannot tell you how many times I've heard an antisemtitc remark, only to told I'm "being too sensitive" or "you can't take these things too seriously." I once complained that someone spoke of "the k*kes," and was told that it's not so bad. It's like there's an unwritten rule around DC that antisemtism will be met with a little slap on the wrist, if that, while all other forms of bigotry are totally in accepted. And I agree he should be forced to resign. This isn't the first time he's complained about 'the Rothschilds. I for one would love to see black Democratic officials, who aim to protect their constituents against racism, extend that same concern to Jews - and get rid of the guy. But just you wait. I'm sure that figure that "the Jews" will settle down in a few days and this will all blow over. |
happens a lot on this board when it comes to anti semitism. it appears that the argument is that it is all "okay" as long as Jews aren't being physically hurt. it's really unbelievable in this day and age. |
Yup. Between this and erecting a statue for Marion Barry, and even the Farrakhan adulation, Dems have little credibility to attack Trump. |
|
I have gone back and forth on this since the news broke. I think at this point, he has to resign and the Council needs to put pressure on him to force the decision.
We are in open and inclusive city and the Capital of the United States of American. Our President notwithstanding, we need to set the standard and be the model for the country. Now is not the time tolerate any "-isms" on any level. |
Yup. I've seen some things said against Jews on this forum that made my skin crawl. And this board is populated overwhelmingly by liberals, who are supposedly against bigotry. Different measure for the Jews apparently. This whole episode has made my blood boil. Why aren't the black leaders calling for his resignation,,and showing that antisemitism - and not just anti-black racism - is not acceptable? Or would they rather invite Farrakan to their next meeting? |
|
I posted earlier my amazement that there wasn't more reaction to his belief in crazy ideas like weather control. In making that observation, I did not mean to imply that I didn't abhor the antisemitism and think that alone was resignation-worthy.
At this point, people not living in Ward 8 should be putting pressure on their reps to publicly call for his resignation. Can't believe how tepid they are being in their responses. |
Nobody has any thoughts? |
A black woman on this board actually came out yesterday and said that she has no issue with anti-Semitic Democrats in leadership roles. Her twisted reasoning was that since Pence is anti-gay, it's fair for blacks to be anti-Jew. (Obviously, she's an antisemite in search of an excuse for it, but that one takes the cake.) |
My thought is that a PR firm helped them prepare a written statement to recover from yet another indication of antisemitisim among Democrats, and specifically black Democrats. In this case, White has made previous antisemtic remarks, and it's time that liberals who claim to be against bigotry put their money where their mouth is. It is obvious that this guy is an anti-Semite, and he needs to resign. Otherwise, the message is......"Democrats can talk shit about the Jews, push out hateful conspiracy theories, and then just apologize. After all, they're only Jews." Nope. Democrats need to take as hard a line against anti-Jew remarks as they would if a white Democrat said something henious about blacks. |
What are your thoughts on Councilman Mendelson not taking a hard line? |
NP. I don't disagree with anything you say at all, only I'm surprised that you seem to be connecting Liberalism with anti-semitism as if it were a new thing. I see movements on campus by Liberal students that are strongly anti-semitic. Pro-palestinian. Etc. This is not a new thing. Also not a new thing is the fact that many, many Liberals are insanely intolerant, and at the same time completely oblivious/self-justifying. |
| I'm appalled by Council's weak sauce reaction. Agree with PPs that had this been an anti-black sentiment voiced by a Council member there would have been immediate swift pressure for resignation. |
I think this illustrates the point I was making in my earlier post about why focusing on the stupidity of White's remarks was more important than focusing on his anti-Semitism. Because White offered an apology and started working with Jewish groups to "gain understanding", he provided an easy out for his Council colleagues. As Mendelson says in his statement, "Many councilmembers have said they accept his apology, and I find it to be sincere and unequivocal." The general reaction seems to be, "White apologized, case closed." Based on the reaction of most Council Members, you would think that when White said that the Rothschilds were controlling our climate in order to make money, his only error was singling out a Jewish family. Had White not been ignorant of the Rothschilds' religion, it seems that his statement would have been otherwise acceptable to the Council. Certainly Mendelson makes no objection to the unscientific and moronic nature of White's remarks. I think the explanation for the Council Members' position is pretty obvious. It is easy to condemn anti-Semitism and accept White's apology. But, pointing out that White is a idiotic conspiracy theorist on the order of the Pizzagaters creates a much more difficult situation. What do you do about that? There are no easy answers. That's not something that can be adequately addressed with a simple press release. Have you ever known a politician to choose a difficult and probably futile path when an easy alternative exists? I haven't and DC's elected officials are definitely not eager to do so. All we can do is to insist that an apology and new engagement with the Jewish community is not enough. Conspiracy theorists simply don't belong on the Council. |