They don't necessarily believe it. They just found it convenient to label people that way so that they use it to their advantage. These people have no ethics. |
You've been babbling that for years and TJ is only getting better and more competitive. |
omg! I'm so scared that TJs days are numbered as in your days are numbered. There is nothing that obligates our tax payers to support a special group of parasites and criminals who don't even know who their dads are indefinitely. |
Don't worry too much about a handful of naysayers here posing anonymously. No one cares about these trolls. Possibly it's just the same person, or at the most a couple. Regarding your daughter not standing a chance, I say it doesn't matter, she should work hard and earn her grades and if someone cheated on the questions and get better grades so be it. If your child is capable she will come up in life and those who use short cut methods will always end up looking for such methods in life and eventually will fail. |
Doesn't matter what these people are saying, they've been saying this for years, fact is TJ knows how to figure out between deserving and non-deserving candidates. It's not perfect, but close. There may be a few exceptions here and there, but mostly they are doing a good job. |
| The strident posters here are mostly Fem-Nazis. One of the First posts was why the male/female ratio was not 50/50. When you mix in racism with that, you have a Hitlerina. BTW, I think it's the same person who keeps posting the same crap. |
oh so hostile (as was the other poster who called me a hypocrit -- whatever that means).... what's wrong with a lottery? It's fair to everyone who has passed a defined threshold. There are a limited number of spots, and I think we all agree that there are plenty of capable students who do not get admission under the current process. And there is an objective problem with the admissions when only 1% of certain groups are admitted. This has nothing to do with "my precious snowflake" as my snowflake probably isn't going to TJ b/c I wouldn't want him in that environment. I'm part of the resistance -- the white folks who are no longer even seeking TJ b/c of what it has become (not just demographics, but the pressure/anxiety culture). So, this really isn't about me or my snowflake. I know other school systems that offer spots to the elementary G/T programs based on lottery. Clearly, the DCPS offers regular school admissions based on lottery. We're not talking about random lottery admissions for everyone -- we're talking about random lottery for those who pass certain criteria. It would end up with a much better demographic result and it can't be gamed. It will eliminate the "asian kids are taking over" or "asian kids are ruining it for the rest of us" mindset. Lottery would reduce the importance of prep classes. If you think the way it is done right now is based solely on merit -- I would beg to differ. |
| yes I know what "hypocrite" means -- but not in the context it was used as an insult. |
I would like kids to not cheat, even if the teacher uses a test that has been used before. Why blame the teachers when kids cheat? |
Sorry, hit submit too soon. I'm not sure a petition is appropriate here. I'd like to see the school create a contract that makes it clear that if a student cheats, there will be consequences that increase in severity with each transaction, with the third strike meaning return to the student's base school. The parents need to understand that cheating will not be tolerated by the school, and they will not accept excuses. |
Asian parent here.. Wholeheartedly agree with this. Prob. one of the most logical solutions to the capacity problem. You are right, we will need at least one more TJ to accommodate all the qualified kids. Why not a lottery of qualified candidates? This shuts everyone up. |
|
Ok people want to know the dirty secret there already are multiple TJs
It's called any AP/honors sequence in most of the high schools in FCPS Arlington and Loudoun TJ = a couple hundred people can do math a year early that's it in the big scheme of things it means nothing |
You are talking like the "Parents" are one single entity. They are not. They come together when issues matter to them and don't otherwise. The school is in charge. They should lead this effort and convince/cajole/bully parents and students into compliance. Middle School starts at 7:30. They didn't ask me. They just announced it. Nothing prevents TJ management to announce that cheaters will get a failing grade in the tests that they cheat in. This will affect their overall grade and if that falls below a B, they go back to base. Don't understand why this is complicated. I as a parent do not have the time to be involved in this. Same with the teachers. If they can't even change the questions from year to year, come on.. that's the height of laziness. |
| Both the county and FCPS were much better before TJHSST was set up. One day we'll get back to some measure of normalcy. I feel so sorry for the people who were robbed of their neighborhood school and now have to watch bus loads of Asians pour in from western Fairfax as their own kids cross 95 and 395 to get to Edison. |
|
While penalties on cheating students may be instituted, it should not be the primary focus of this discussion. I am more concerned about teachers, who don't care to level the field for their students or actually learn about their students' progress and grade accordingly. If test questions are recycled by the teacher, he/she gets no feedback on whether his students learnt anything at all or simply copied someone's solution from the previous year. If test questions change, but only a portion of the class has access to old exams, that portion of the class has an advantage on the actual test, rendering any grading in that course as well as recommendation letters devoid of reality. But grades and recommendation letters ultimately do matter for the kids' future, who are we kidding? If you are a teacher, don't recycle old test questions in your new tests but do make the old questions available to every student in the class! Why are we trying to hold the kids to a higher standard than adults? It's the teacher's job to evaluate his/her students in a manner that reflects their real knowledge and skills, not their level of honesty or ability to get their hands on the old tests. If this is happening, it's because the teacher is not doing his job!
I had this happen in a grad class (there were ten Ph.D. students in it), that I took years ago. Three students (German, Italian and (white) American) got access to an old exam from a more senior student, while a professor in that course decided to use the exact same exam questions again. The three got A's, the rest landed on a curve. There is simply no way to outperform a student, who comes with readily available answers, on an exam with real time pressure, no matter how smart you are. That's because, even if you are the smartest person in the room, you still need time to think (provided the test questions are not completely trivial). An excellent Chinese student in that class got an F (since his score was way below the cheaters' score, and the curve adjusts for the mean score), was put on probation, had to repeat the course. He ultimately graduated, but don't tell me that experience was somehow useful for him. He wasted two-three years of his graduate life on that nonsense. Of the three cheaters, two are now professors, navigating their careers quite successfully, I might add: kissing editors' ass...s, stroking egos of important people in the field... you know, "networking." The chinese guy is also a professor (at a slightly less prestigeous school). Honesty is an individual characteristic, not racial. But my point is that grading should not be about honesty or following rules, it should be about finding a way to correctly evaluate students, and it's a direct responsibility of teachers to do that. And, if you think that you will not cheat when stakes are high and everyone around you is cheating, look at the Wells Fargo scandal, which did not involve kids but adults. (I am not Asian, in case you are wondering.) |