The Menendez Brothers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Try to imagine being murdered and having no life at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

You realize that most molesters, rapists, and murderers serve much less time, right? Not so much serial killers.

The evidence of José’s sexual abuse is clear and convincing. Kitty never tried to protect them, and she was José’s enforcer. She had no empathy and treated them as rivals. Sometimes we see mothers who are abused and can’t get it together to effectively protect, but they try, they respond to their children as mothers. The vast majority of both sides of their family support the brothers. I hope the brothers can go home soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Try to imagine being murdered and having no life at all.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Imagine one of the killers murdering your child. Then consider how sad you’ll feel for them sitting in prison. A lifetime wouldn’t be long enough. It should be a life changing punishment. That is the point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

I suppose you thought Charles Manson should have been released? He had a very abusive childhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

I suppose you thought Charles Manson should have been released? He had a very abusive childhood.

NP. Are you stupid? The brothers only killed their abusers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

I suppose you thought Charles Manson should have been released? He had a very abusive childhood.

NP. Are you stupid? The brothers only killed their abusers.

No, I'm not stupid and am very much aware of the many abused children who grow up to be abusers. That does not give them license to kill and have their sentences reduced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you hear the story about the dog head in the fridge? We may never know if that's true but if it is, wow, what a hell these guys grew up in.

This is not true. There was a show earlier debunking all these sensationalist baloney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG - when was it bought before this? The decorations look so dated!

The deco doesn't convey. Update a bathroom and the kitchen and it's amazing!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note - the house they lived in and murdered their parents in is still standing in Beverly Hills. Who would buy that house?!

Should it be torn down?

I wouldn't live in it! I can't imagine watching TV in the same room where two people got their heads blown off by their children! Yes, tear it down and build another - that is prime real estate in Beverly Hills.

I wound totally live there. The crime was so very long ago and I didn't know them.