No, they don't. You are in a rapidly dwindling minority of sad, insecure people who think they have to crush the rights of others in order to feel better about themselves. I'm sorry for you. |
Nice deflection. I notice you still didn't respond to the points being made. I see what you did there... |
So...who's canceling their outer banks vacation? |
Sexually, yes, homosexuality is completely dysfunctional. I didn't mean to imply that the dysfunction went beyond that. It is a sexual abnormality. And yes, the majority of people in America agree with me. You do realize that people across the country are making laws prohibiting gay marriage? Do you think all these people are in favor of homosexuality but just being bigots? And, I realize you are having a difficult time comprehending this, but I do not hate gay people in any way. I would bet all the money I have, that you feel much greater hate for me and my beliefs than I do for gay people. |
I think it goes both ways. |
I agree with you, 15:15. Sadly, not agreeing with homosexuality equals being a bigot and/or hate-filled. It's a very juvenile argument, but it works for some. ![]() I, too, am against gay marriage, but would be in full support of a civil law that grants same-sex couples full rights under federal and state law. Of course, as this country stands, allowing gay marriage seems like the easiest way to grant gays their rights, so if taken to a vote, I would support gay marriage. Though I have certain beliefs, I would not want those beliefs to trample on the liberty and happiness of others. |
I think I might cry. |
Your belief seems to be limited to the use of the word "marriage".
Why? |
By that "logic," and I'm being kind here, oral sex is completely dysfunctional. So you never go down on your husband? He never reciprocates? Somehow, I doubt that. And yet, even after engaging in that "dysfunctional" sexual behavior, you still have the right to marry. Why is that? |
So all of this quibbling is about the use of the word "marriage," but you think gays should be afforded the same federal and state rights as married heterosexuals? |
Oh hon, no they don't. Check the polls. And let's make one thing clear -- whatever "hatred" people may have for you, individually, as a result of your particular beliefs, that is entirely different from thinking that an ENTIRE CATEGORY OF PEOPLE are "sexually dysfunctional," that their love is illigitimate, and that they are abnormal. You're operating on a whole different playing field of hate. |
Oh hon, no they don't. Check the polls. And let's make one thing clear -- whatever "hatred" people may have for you, individually, as a result of your particular beliefs, that is entirely different from thinking that an ENTIRE CATEGORY OF PEOPLE are "sexually dysfunctional," that their love is illigitimate, and that they are abnormal. You're operating on a whole different playing field of hate. |
In a nutshell, yes. I believe that marriage is a religious ceremony that forms a union before God (or that person's "God"). Civil unions are for those who are non-believers and/or those forming a union outside of "the church". |
not me |
I agree with this for the most part. I don't think people are 100% gay or 100% straight, and a lot of different factors could push them to either side. |