Thomas Massie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

Sure Maga sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just watched part of Massie’s concession speech and he is not going away.

he has 7 glorious months to reveal a lot.

Seriously, he’s to hoping. I’m sure that he’s been planning for this possibility.

Make it worth it, Massie.

We need some heroes!! I don't care for MTG but maybe they will unite. She's been talking a lot.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Massie's primary rigged?

He got more votes than he did in 2024. But the total voter turnout doubled and Gallrein somehow got 40,000 extra votes out of nowhere.

If we know anything it’s that the powers that be will do anything to win, so no one would be surprised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

I sincerely doubt that maga is that nuanced in their thinking. They are blind idol worshippers to the golden calf that is Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly enough mail in ballots for Gallrein to win showed up at the last minute. How convenient.

I thought MAGA was against mail-in voting, except when Trump does it?!?

But, yes...very convenient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

Really good point by JVL on the Bulwark tonight - when all these people voted for Trump and Massie in 2024 they wanted the Epstein files released and they wanted no new wars in the Middle East, as both of those candidates promised. Trump is the one who changed but they voted to get rid of Massie.

Massie did it to himself. There was a trust issue.

He was reading the names of people associated with Epstein out loud in the House.

But some of the people he listed were people in a police lineup who had nothing to do with Epstein. He was sloppy in other respects too.

I sincerely doubt that maga is that nuanced in their thinking. They are blind idol worshippers to the golden calf that is Trump.

More like golden cow standing under the golden arches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seemed like he was chasing clout given how inconsistent his views were on things like Epstein.

Oh, wow. People who want to prosecute pedophiles are merely chasing clout? WTAF!

Honestly why do MAGA openly love pedos all the sudden?

[Anonymous]

How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

ChatGPT analysis:

For KY-04 GOP, the jump appears real and unusually large: 2024 GOP primary turnout was about 52.6k votes, while unofficial 2026 results show 105,361 votes — 57,822 Gallrein + 47,539 Massie, essentially a doubling.

My conclusion: doubling within two years is rare when the baseline is already 50,000+ voters, as in KY-04. It is more common when the earlier race was sleepy, uncontested, or had a very low base. The KY-04 pattern looks like a “nationalized incumbent-purge primary” case rather than normal cyclic turnout movement.

Result: for machine-readable FEC data 2000–2022, I found:

* 4,277 eligible same district/party two-cycle comparisons
* 471 cases where turnout at least doubled
* Frequency: 11.0%
* But where the prior primary already had 50,000+ voters, only 28 of 1,706 doubled: 1.6%

[Anonymous]

“Thomas Massie is a climate change-denying raw milk-advocating lynching-supporting anti-vax anti-healthcare gun-obsessed bigoted Putin-glazing hypocrite who voted against disaster relief except in his home state. He voted against Biden-supported bills 98% of the time, the most of any congressmember.

But what ended his political career was speaking out against rich men raping children. MAGA are one-issue voters. That issue is that Donald Trump and his friends are allowed to rape your children.“

Steve Hoffstetter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

this happened when McConnell won the last time he ran...the polling numbers and the end results were off by like a factor of 6.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

ChatGPT analysis:

For KY-04 GOP, the jump appears real and unusually large: 2024 GOP primary turnout was about 52.6k votes, while unofficial 2026 results show 105,361 votes — 57,822 Gallrein + 47,539 Massie, essentially a doubling.

My conclusion: doubling within two years is rare when the baseline is already 50,000+ voters, as in KY-04. It is more common when the earlier race was sleepy, uncontested, or had a very low base. The KY-04 pattern looks like a “nationalized incumbent-purge primary” case rather than normal cyclic turnout movement.

Result: for machine-readable FEC data 2000–2022, I found:

* 4,277 eligible same district/party two-cycle comparisons
* 471 cases where turnout at least doubled
* Frequency: 11.0%
* But where the prior primary already had 50,000+ voters, only 28 of 1,706 doubled: 1.6%

We should probably investigate and audit all 28 of those elections.

Trump always tells on himself - "mail in voting is not secure!" Why do you think he says that? Connect the dots folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

ChatGPT analysis:

For KY-04 GOP, the jump appears real and unusually large: 2024 GOP primary turnout was about 52.6k votes, while unofficial 2026 results show 105,361 votes — 57,822 Gallrein + 47,539 Massie, essentially a doubling.

My conclusion: doubling within two years is rare when the baseline is already 50,000+ voters, as in KY-04. It is more common when the earlier race was sleepy, uncontested, or had a very low base. The KY-04 pattern looks like a “nationalized incumbent-purge primary” case rather than normal cyclic turnout movement.

Result: for machine-readable FEC data 2000–2022, I found:

* 4,277 eligible same district/party two-cycle comparisons
* 471 cases where turnout at least doubled
* Frequency: 11.0%
* But where the prior primary already had 50,000+ voters, only 28 of 1,706 doubled: 1.6%

We should probably investigate and audit all 28 of those elections.

Trump always tells on himself - "mail in voting is not secure!" Why do you think he says that? Connect the dots folks.

Polls showed Gallerin winning. No other primary had Massie so against Trump. It's a very conservative area.

[Anonymous]

Perfect, just another impediment to Israel's desire for all out war with Iran removed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the GOP KY-4 primary go from 52,600 votes in 2024 to over 105,000 votes in 2026? That's a 100% increase in votes cast in a primary within two years.

To me, that is the greatest indication of fraud. Turnout doesn't suddenly double for a Congressional primary.

ChatGPT analysis:

For KY-04 GOP, the jump appears real and unusually large: 2024 GOP primary turnout was about 52.6k votes, while unofficial 2026 results show 105,361 votes — 57,822 Gallrein + 47,539 Massie, essentially a doubling.

My conclusion: doubling within two years is rare when the baseline is already 50,000+ voters, as in KY-04. It is more common when the earlier race was sleepy, uncontested, or had a very low base. The KY-04 pattern looks like a “nationalized incumbent-purge primary” case rather than normal cyclic turnout movement.

Result: for machine-readable FEC data 2000–2022, I found:

* 4,277 eligible same district/party two-cycle comparisons
* 471 cases where turnout at least doubled
* Frequency: 11.0%
* But where the prior primary already had 50,000+ voters, only 28 of 1,706 doubled: 1.6%

We should probably investigate and audit all 28 of those elections.

Trump always tells on himself - "mail in voting is not secure!" Why do you think he says that? Connect the dots folks.

Polls showed Gallerin winning. No other primary had Massie so against Trump. It's a very conservative area.

The polls did not show a doubling of turnout. A Gallerin win is much less suspect if the turnout is up by only 25%.

There was no reason for turnout to double in KY-4.